Can glenoid wear be accurately assessed using x-ray imaging? Evaluating agreement of x-ray and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) Walch classification

被引:12
|
作者
Kopka, Michaela [1 ]
Fourman, Mitchell [1 ]
Soni, Ashish [1 ]
Cordle, Andrew C. [2 ]
Lin, Albert [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Div Sports Med, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Radiol, Med Ctr, Div Musculoskeletal Radiol, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
关键词
Walch classification; glenohumeral arthritis; shoulder arthroplasty; preoperative planning; x-ray; MRI; PRIMARY GLENOHUMERAL OSTEOARTHRITIS; TOTAL SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY; BONE LOSS; INSTABILITY; MANAGEMENT; ARTHRITIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jse.2017.03.014
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The Walch classification is the most recognized means of assessing glenoid wear in pre-operative planning for shoulder arthroplasty. This classification relies on advanced imaging, which is more expensive and less practical than plain radiographs. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the Walch classification could be accurately applied to x-ray images compared with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as the gold standard. We hypothesized that x-ray images cannot adequately replace advanced imaging in the evaluation of glenoid wear. Methods: Preoperative axillary x-ray images and MRI scans of 50 patients assessed for shoulder arthroplasty were independently reviewed by 5 raters. Glenoid wear was individually classified according to the Walch classification using each imaging modality. The raters then collectively reviewed the MRI scans and assigned a consensus classification to serve as the gold standard. The. coefficient was used to determine interobserver agreement for x-ray images and independent MRI reads, as well as the agreement between x-ray images and consensus MRI. Results: The inter-rater agreement for x-ray images and MRIs was "moderate" (kappa = 0.42 and kappa = 0.47, respectively) for the 5-category Walch classification (A1, A2, B1, B2, C) and "moderate" (kappa = 0.54 and kappa = 0.59, respectively) for the 3-category Walch classification (A, B, C). The agreement between x-ray images and consensus MRI was much lower: "fair-to-moderate" (kappa = 0.21-0.51) for the 5-category and "moderate" (kappa = 0.36-0.60) for the 3-category Walch classification. Discussion: The inter-rater agreement between x-ray images and consensus MRI is "fair-to-moderate." This is lower than the previously reported reliability of the Walch classification using computed tomography scans. Accordingly, x-ray images are inferior to advanced imaging when assessing glenoid wear. (C) 2017 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1527 / 1532
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging fusion for cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Choi, Jinwoo
    Radau, Perry
    Xu, Robert
    Wright, Graham A.
    MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2016, 31 : 98 - 107
  • [2] Imaging of stroke: a comparison between X-ray fluorescence and magnetic resonance imaging methods
    Zheng, Weili
    Haacke, E. Mark
    Webb, Samuel M.
    Nichol, Helen
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2012, 30 (10) : 1416 - 1423
  • [3] First Multimodal Embolization Particles Visible on X-ray/Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Bartling, Soenke H.
    Budjan, Johannes
    Aviv, Hagit
    Haneder, Stefan
    Kraenzlin, Bettina
    Michaely, Henrik
    Margel, Shlomo
    Diehl, Steffen
    Semmler, Wolfhard
    Gretz, Norbert
    Schoenberg, Stefan O.
    Sadick, Maliha
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2011, 46 (03) : 178 - 186
  • [4] Prototype of the high sensitive X-ray microcalorimeter for X-ray imaging
    Kudo, H
    Nakamura, T
    Arakawa, T
    Ohtsuka, S
    Izumi, T
    Shoji, S
    Sato, H
    Kobayashi, H
    Mori, K
    Homma, T
    Osaka, T
    Mitsuda, K
    Yamasaki, NY
    Fujimoto, R
    Iyomoto, N
    Oshima, T
    Futamoto, K
    Takei, Y
    Ichitsubo, T
    Fujimori, T
    Ishisaki, Y
    Morita, U
    Koga, T
    Sato, K
    Ohashi, T
    Kuroda, Y
    Onishi, M
    Otake, K
    Beppu, F
    SENSORS AND ACTUATORS A-PHYSICAL, 2004, 114 (2-3) : 171 - 175
  • [5] Comparative Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and X-ray Examination on Knee Degenerative Osteoarthrosis
    Liu, Siyu
    Gao, Yuan
    Liu, Yu
    Xiang, Jiabing
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND HEALTH INFORMATICS, 2019, 9 (08) : 1760 - 1764
  • [6] X-Ray Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: A Clinical Comparison
    Gariani, Karim
    Lebowitz, Dan
    Kressmann, Benjamin
    Gariani, Joanna
    Uckay, Ilker
    CURRENT DIABETES REVIEWS, 2021, 17 (03) : 373 - 377
  • [7] Coherent X-Ray Diffractive Imaging
    Vartaniants, Ivan
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED PHASE MEASUREMENT METHODS IN OPTICS AN IMAGING, 2010, 1236 : 200 - 200
  • [8] Solar X-ray imaging telescope
    Gaither, CC
    Desai, UD
    MISSIONS TO THE SUN, 1996, 2804 : 274 - 285
  • [9] Understanding X-ray cargo imaging
    Chen, GY
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION B-BEAM INTERACTIONS WITH MATERIALS AND ATOMS, 2005, 241 (1-4): : 810 - 815
  • [10] Hybrid scintillators for x-ray imaging
    Bueno, C
    Rairden, RL
    Betz, RA
    PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING: MEDICAL IMAGING 1996, 1996, 2708 : 469 - 481