Monitoring the biodiversity of regions: Key principles and possible pitfalls

被引:62
作者
Buckland, S. T. [1 ]
Johnston, A. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ St Andrews, Ctr Res Ecol & Environm Modelling, The Observ, St Andrews KY16 9LZ, Fife, Scotland
[2] British Trust Ornithol, Thetford IP24 2PU, Norfolk, England
[3] Cornell Lab Ornithol, 159 Sapsucker Woods Rd, Ithaca, NY 14850 USA
[4] Univ Cambridge, Dept Zool, Conservat Sci Grp, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, England
关键词
Animal abundance estimation; Biased sample; Biodiversity trends; Convention for Biological Diversity targets; Geometric mean; Representative sample; BREEDING BIRD SURVEY; LIVING PLANET INDEX; POPULATION TRENDS; ACOUSTIC IDENTIFICATION; BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY; AUTOMATED DETECTION; SURVEY DESIGN; POINT COUNTS; SCIENCE; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocon.2017.07.034
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Through the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) 2010 and 2020 biodiversity targets, nations committed to reducing the rate of loss of biodiversity. This requires calculating the biodiversity trends in nations, whereas previously, most academic research on quantifying biodiversity concerned communities within relatively small sites. We consider design and analysis issues that CBD targets raise and explore the potential pitfalls for managers of monitoring schemes when statistical principles yield to practical constraints. We list five main criteria that well-designed monitoring programmes should meet: representative sampling locations, sufficient sample size, sufficient detections of target species, a representative sample of species, and a sound temporal sampling scheme. We examine the implications of biodiversity assessments that fail to meet these criteria and suggest ways to alleviate these implications through analytical approaches. We discuss the remarkable potential for wide-scale biodiversity monitoring offered by technological advances and by the rise of citizen science.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 34
页数:12
相关论文
共 108 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ECOLOGICAL CENSUS TE, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511790508
[2]   Citizen science reveals trends in bat populations: The National Bat Monitoring Programme in Great Britain [J].
Barlow, K. E. ;
Briggs, P. A. ;
Haysom, K. A. ;
Hutson, A. M. ;
Lechiara, N. L. ;
Racey, P. A. ;
Walsh, A. L. ;
Langton, S. D. .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2015, 182 :14-26
[3]   Using eDNA to develop a national citizen science-based monitoring programme for the great crested newt (Triturus cristatus) [J].
Biggs, Jeremy ;
Ewald, Naomi ;
Valentini, Alice ;
Gaboriaud, Coline ;
Dejean, Tony ;
Griffiths, Richard A. ;
Foster, Jim ;
Wilkinson, John W. ;
Arnell, Andy ;
Brotherton, Peter ;
Williams, Penny ;
Dunn, Francesca .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2015, 183 :19-28
[4]  
Binder DA., 1988, HDB STAT, P187
[5]   Statistical solutions for error and bias in global citizen science datasets [J].
Bird, Tomas J. ;
Bates, Amanda E. ;
Lefcheck, Jonathan S. ;
Hill, Nicole A. ;
Thomson, Russell J. ;
Edgar, Graham J. ;
Stuart-Smith, Rick D. ;
Wotherspoon, Simon ;
Krkosek, Martin ;
Stuart-Smith, Jemina F. ;
Pecl, Gretta T. ;
Barrett, Neville ;
Frusher, Stewart .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2014, 173 :144-154
[6]   Distorted Views of Biodiversity: Spatial and Temporal Bias in Species Occurrence Data [J].
Boakes, Elizabeth H. ;
McGowan, Philip J. K. ;
Fuller, Richard A. ;
Ding Chang-qing ;
Clark, Natalie E. ;
O'Connor, Kim ;
Mace, Georgina M. .
PLOS BIOLOGY, 2010, 8 (06)
[7]   Environmental DNA for wildlife biology and biodiversity monitoring [J].
Bohmann, Kristine ;
Evans, Alice ;
Gilbert, M. Thomas P. ;
Carvalho, Gary R. ;
Creer, Simon ;
Knapp, Michael ;
Yu, Douglas W. ;
de Bruyn, Mark .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2014, 29 (06) :358-367
[8]   Spatially explicit maximum likelihood methods for capture-recapture studies [J].
Borchers, D. L. ;
Efford, M. G. .
BIOMETRICS, 2008, 64 (02) :377-385
[9]   Developing and launching a wider countryside butterfly survey across the United Kingdom [J].
Brereton, T. M. ;
Cruickshanks, K. L. ;
Risely, K. ;
Noble, D. G. ;
Roy, D. B. .
JOURNAL OF INSECT CONSERVATION, 2011, 15 (1-2) :279-290
[10]   Acoustic Identification of Bats in the Eastern United States: A Comparison of Parametric and Nonparametric Methods [J].
Britzke, Eric R. ;
Duchamp, Joseph E. ;
Murray, Kevin L. ;
Swihart, Robert K. ;
Robbins, Lynn W. .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2011, 75 (03) :660-667