Genetic resistance to white pine blister rust, restoration options, and potential use of biotechnology

被引:22
作者
Sniezko, Richard A. [1 ]
Liu, Jun -Jun [2 ]
机构
[1] Dorena Genet Resource Ctr, USDA Forest Serv, 34963 Shoreview Dr, Cottage Grove, OR 97424 USA
[2] Nat Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Serv, 506 West Burnside Rd, Victoria, BC V8Z 1M5, Canada
关键词
Genetic resistance; Durability; Stability; Usability; Restoration; White pine blister rust; Biotechnology; Cronartium ribicola; ANTIMICROBIAL PEPTIDE; CRONARTIUM-RIBICOLA; NORTH-AMERICA; MAJOR GENE; MONTICOLA; EXPRESSION; IDENTIFICATION; TRANSCRIPTOME; PATHOGEN; SUSCEPTIBILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120168
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
All nine five-needle white pine species (genus Pinus, subgenus Strobus, subsections Strobus and Balfourianae) native to the U.S. and Canada are highly susceptible to white pine blister rust (WPBR), caused by the non-native fungal pathogen Cronartium ribicola. WPBR is present within the geographic range of eight of the nine species in the U.S. including the four species also present in Canada, but has not yet been documented in Mexico. Genetic resistance to WPBR has been documented in eight of the white pine species present in the U.S., with extensive work on foxtail pine (Pinus balfouriana) just recently started. The development of populations of trees with durable genetic resistance, while also retaining genetic diversity and adaptability, is seen as a fundamental step in restoring white pine species. Major gene resistance (MGR) has been documented in four species, and quantitative resistance (QR) is likely present in all species, but at levels ranging from very low to moderately high. Restoration using seed from WPBR resistant parent trees has been underway for several decades for western white pine (P. monticola), sugar pine (P. lambertiana), and eastern white pine (P. strobus), and has begun more recently for whitebark pine (P. albicaulis) and limber pine (P. flexilis). For many of these white pine species, locating additional resistant parents and acquiring more seed will be needed over the ensuing decades. The previous efforts in developing populations of trees with genetic resistance to WPBR has used conventional tree improvement techniques of tree selection and seedling inoculation trials. However, in the future with the continued development of omics resources and tools in white pines, biotechnology has the potential to aid resistance programs. Candidate genes have been identified for host MGR, QR, and disease susceptibility (S) to WPBR, as well as for C. ribicola effectors. Marker-assisted selection (MAS) tools developed from MGR-linked genes would be useful to combine MGR and QR, which should improve the potential durability of resistance. Integration of breeding programs with omics information and tools can help pave a road towards improvement of WPBR resistance through biotechnological approaches such as MAS, and genomic selection (GS), or potentially helping to incorporate unique resistance not currently found in North American five-needle white pines. In the near future, these tools could potentially aid in the initial search for candidate trees which would increase the efficiency of developing WPBR resistant populations, as well as defining the extent and distribution of adaptive genetic variation in the species, which will aid in planning restoration efforts.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Molecular tools in the study of the white pine blister rust [Cronartium ribicola] pathosystem
    Ekramoddoullah, AKM
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2005, 27 (04) : 510 - 520
  • [42] Association Mapping and Development of Marker-Assisted Selection Tools for the Resistance to White Pine Blister Rust in the Alberta Limber Pine Populations
    Liu, Jun-Jun
    Sniezko, Richard A.
    Sissons, Robert
    Krakowski, Jodie
    Alger, Genoa
    Schoettle, Anna W.
    Williams, Holly
    Zamany, Arezoo
    Zitomer, Rachel A.
    Kegley, Angelia
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2020, 11
  • [43] Whitebark Pine Prevalence and Ecological Function in Treeline Communities of the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem, USA: Potential Disruption by White Pine Blister Rust
    Wagner, Aaron C.
    Tomback, Diana F.
    Resler, Lynn M.
    Pansing, Elizabeth R.
    FORESTS, 2018, 9 (10):
  • [44] Interactions of White Pine Blister Rust and Mountain Pine Beetle in Whitebark Pine Ecosystems in the Southern Greater Yellowstone Area
    Bockino, Nancy K.
    Tinker, Daniel B.
    NATURAL AREAS JOURNAL, 2012, 32 (01) : 31 - 40
  • [45] The inheritance of resistance to Scots pine blister rust in Pinus sylvestris
    Persson, Torgny
    Hall, David
    Barklund, Pia
    Samils, Berit
    Gull, Bengt Andersson
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 568
  • [46] Limber Pine Regeneration and White Pine Blister Rust in the Central and Southern Rocky Mountains
    Cleaver, Christy M.
    Jacobi, William R.
    Burns, Kelly S.
    Means, Robert E.
    FOREST SCIENCE, 2017, 63 (02) : 151 - 164
  • [47] Changes in white pine blister rust infection and mortality in limber pine over time
    Smith, Cyndi M.
    Langor, David W.
    Myrholm, Colin
    Weber, Jim
    Gillies, Cameron
    Stuart-Smith, Jon
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2013, 43 (10) : 919 - 928
  • [48] Topographic influences on the distribution of white pine blister rust in Pinus albicaulis treeline communities
    Smith-Mckenna, Emily K.
    Resler, Lynn M.
    Tomback, Diana F.
    Zhang, Huaiye
    Malanson, George P.
    ECOSCIENCE, 2013, 20 (03): : 215 - 229
  • [49] White pine blister rust control in North America: A case history
    Maloy, OC
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1997, 35 : 87 - 109
  • [50] Genetic mapping of Pinus flexilis major gene (Cr4) for resistance to white pine blister rust using transcriptome-based SNP genotyping
    Liu, Jun-Jun
    Schoettle, Anna W.
    Sniezko, Richard A.
    Sturrock, Rona N.
    Zamany, Arezoo
    Williams, Holly
    Ha, Amanda
    Chan, Danelle
    Danchok, Bob
    Savin, Douglas P.
    Kegley, Angelia
    BMC GENOMICS, 2016, 17