Genetic resistance to white pine blister rust, restoration options, and potential use of biotechnology

被引:22
|
作者
Sniezko, Richard A. [1 ]
Liu, Jun -Jun [2 ]
机构
[1] Dorena Genet Resource Ctr, USDA Forest Serv, 34963 Shoreview Dr, Cottage Grove, OR 97424 USA
[2] Nat Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Serv, 506 West Burnside Rd, Victoria, BC V8Z 1M5, Canada
关键词
Genetic resistance; Durability; Stability; Usability; Restoration; White pine blister rust; Biotechnology; Cronartium ribicola; ANTIMICROBIAL PEPTIDE; CRONARTIUM-RIBICOLA; NORTH-AMERICA; MAJOR GENE; MONTICOLA; EXPRESSION; IDENTIFICATION; TRANSCRIPTOME; PATHOGEN; SUSCEPTIBILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120168
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
All nine five-needle white pine species (genus Pinus, subgenus Strobus, subsections Strobus and Balfourianae) native to the U.S. and Canada are highly susceptible to white pine blister rust (WPBR), caused by the non-native fungal pathogen Cronartium ribicola. WPBR is present within the geographic range of eight of the nine species in the U.S. including the four species also present in Canada, but has not yet been documented in Mexico. Genetic resistance to WPBR has been documented in eight of the white pine species present in the U.S., with extensive work on foxtail pine (Pinus balfouriana) just recently started. The development of populations of trees with durable genetic resistance, while also retaining genetic diversity and adaptability, is seen as a fundamental step in restoring white pine species. Major gene resistance (MGR) has been documented in four species, and quantitative resistance (QR) is likely present in all species, but at levels ranging from very low to moderately high. Restoration using seed from WPBR resistant parent trees has been underway for several decades for western white pine (P. monticola), sugar pine (P. lambertiana), and eastern white pine (P. strobus), and has begun more recently for whitebark pine (P. albicaulis) and limber pine (P. flexilis). For many of these white pine species, locating additional resistant parents and acquiring more seed will be needed over the ensuing decades. The previous efforts in developing populations of trees with genetic resistance to WPBR has used conventional tree improvement techniques of tree selection and seedling inoculation trials. However, in the future with the continued development of omics resources and tools in white pines, biotechnology has the potential to aid resistance programs. Candidate genes have been identified for host MGR, QR, and disease susceptibility (S) to WPBR, as well as for C. ribicola effectors. Marker-assisted selection (MAS) tools developed from MGR-linked genes would be useful to combine MGR and QR, which should improve the potential durability of resistance. Integration of breeding programs with omics information and tools can help pave a road towards improvement of WPBR resistance through biotechnological approaches such as MAS, and genomic selection (GS), or potentially helping to incorporate unique resistance not currently found in North American five-needle white pines. In the near future, these tools could potentially aid in the initial search for candidate trees which would increase the efficiency of developing WPBR resistant populations, as well as defining the extent and distribution of adaptive genetic variation in the species, which will aid in planning restoration efforts.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Ten Years of Monitoring Illustrates a Cascade of Effects of White Pine Blister Rust and Focuses Whitebark Pine Restoration in the Canadian Rocky and Columbia Mountains
    Shepherd, Brenda
    Jones, Brad
    Sissons, Robert
    Cochrane, Jed
    Park, Jane
    Smith, Cyndi M.
    Stafl, Natalie
    FORESTS, 2018, 9 (03)
  • [22] Climatic Correlates of White Pine Blister Rust Infection in Whitebark Pine in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem
    Thoma, David P.
    Shanahan, Erin K.
    Irvine, Kathryn M.
    FORESTS, 2019, 10 (08):
  • [23] DISTRIBUTION AND FREQUENCY OF A GENE FOR RESISTANCE TO WHITE-PINE BLISTER RUST IN NATURAL-POPULATIONS OF SUGAR PINE
    KINLOCH, BB
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE BOTANIQUE, 1992, 70 (07): : 1319 - 1323
  • [24] Effect of white pine blister rust (Cronartium ribicola) and rust-resistance breeding on genetic variation in western white pine (Pinus monticola)
    Kim, MS
    Brunsfeld, SJ
    McDonald, GI
    Klopfenstein, NB
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 2003, 106 (06) : 1004 - 1010
  • [25] Disease resistance in whitebark pine and potential for restoration of a threatened species
    Sniezko, Richard A.
    Johnson, Jeremy S.
    Kegley, Angelia
    Danchok, Robert
    PLANTS PEOPLE PLANET, 2024, 6 (02) : 341 - 361
  • [26] History of western white pine and blister rust in British Columbia
    Hunt, Richard S.
    FORESTRY CHRONICLE, 2009, 85 (04) : 516 - 520
  • [27] Anti-microbial peptide (AMP): nucleotide variation, gene expression, and host resistance in the white pine blister rust (WPBR) pathosystem
    Liu, Jun-Jun
    Zamany, Arezoo
    Sniezko, Richard A.
    PLANTA, 2013, 237 (01) : 43 - 54
  • [28] A major gene for resistance to white pine blister rust in western white pine from the Western Cascade Range
    Kinloch, BB
    Sniezko, RA
    Barnes, GD
    Greathouse, TE
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1999, 89 (10) : 861 - 867
  • [29] VARIATION OF VIRULENCE OF WHITE-PINE BLISTER RUST
    HOFF, RJ
    MCDONALD, GI
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FOREST PATHOLOGY, 1993, 23 (02) : 103 - 109
  • [30] Black currant clonal identity and white pine blister rust resistance
    Burnes, Todd A.
    Blanchette, Robert A.
    Smith, Jason A.
    Luby, James J.
    HORTSCIENCE, 2008, 43 (01) : 200 - 202