Evaluation of the hypertensive phase after insertion of the Ahmed Glaucoma Valve

被引:195
作者
Nouri-Mahdavi, K [1 ]
Caprioli, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Jules Stein Eye Inst, Glaucoma Div, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0002-9394(03)00630-5
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To investigate the postoperative hypertensive phase (HP) in patients undergoing glaucoma drain, age implant surgery. DESIGN: Interventional case series. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 156 cone secutive eyes (139 patients) who underwent placement of an Ahmed Glaucoma Valve (AGV) with a follow-up of greater than or equal to3 months was performed. Main outcome measures were occurrence and resolution of the HP and intraocu lar pressure (IOP) control. The HP was defined as IOP > 21 mm Hg during the first 3 months after surgery. Resolution of the HP was defined as an IOP < 22 mm Hg and an IOP reduction of 3 mm Hg with the same or fewer number of glaucoma medications. RESULTS: An HP was observed in 88 eyes (56%). It occurred after a mean of 5.0 weeks (median, 4 weeks; range, 1-13 weeks) with an average ( standard deviation) peak IOP of 30.1 (+/- 7.5) mm Hg. Resolution of the HP occurred in 19 of 68 eyes (28%) with available data. Eyes with an HP had a higher mean IOP? and needed more medications 6 to 12 months after surgery than eyes without an HP (17.2 +/- 5.6 vs 14.3 +/- 5.8 mm Hg; P =.012 and 1.7 +/- 1.2 vs 0.3 +/- 0.6 medications; P <.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: A hypertensive phase occurs frequently after implantation of the AGV. However, it resolves in only a minority of eyes. The majority of eyes with an HP have no significant improvement of IOP control and continue to require the same number of glaucoma medications as they did during the HP. (C) 2003 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1001 / 1008
页数:8
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] A clinical study of the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant in advanced glaucoma
    Ayyala, RS
    Zurakowski, D
    Smith, JA
    Monshizadeh, R
    Netland, PA
    Richards, DW
    Layden, WE
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1998, 105 (10) : 1968 - 1976
  • [2] Ayyala RS, 2002, OPHTHALMIC SURG LAS, V33, P94
  • [3] Comparison of different biomaterials for glaucoma drainage devices - Part 2
    Ayyala, RS
    Michelini-Norris, B
    Flores, A
    Haller, E
    Margo, CE
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2000, 118 (08) : 1081 - 1084
  • [4] Ayyala RS, 1999, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V117, P233
  • [5] Randomized clinical trial of the 350-mm2 versus the 500-mm2 Baerveldt implant:: Longer term results -: Is bigger better?
    Britt, MT
    LaBree, LD
    Lloyd, MA
    Minckler, DS
    Heuer, DK
    Baerveldt, G
    Varma, R
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1999, 106 (12) : 2312 - 2318
  • [6] INITIAL CLINICAL-EXPERIENCE WITH THE AHMED GLAUCOMA VALVE IMPLANT
    COLEMAN, AL
    HILL, R
    WILSON, MR
    CHOPLIN, N
    KOTASNEUMANN, R
    TAM, M
    BACHARACH, J
    PANEK, WC
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1995, 120 (01) : 23 - 31
  • [7] FELLENBAUM PS, 1994, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V101, P1178
  • [8] HEUER DK, 1992, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V99, P1512
  • [9] Intermediate-term clinical experience with the Ahmed Glaucoma Valve implant
    Huang, MC
    Netland, PA
    Coleman, AL
    Siegner, SW
    Moster, MR
    Hill, RA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1999, 127 (01) : 27 - 33
  • [10] Intermediate-term outcomes of 350-mm2 Baerveldt glaucoma implants
    Krishna, R
    Godfrey, DG
    Budenz, DL
    Escalona-Camaaño, E
    Gedde, SJ
    Greenfield, DS
    Feuer, W
    Scott, IU
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2001, 108 (03) : 621 - 626