Braess paradox and double-loop optimization method to enhance power grid resilience

被引:34
作者
Zhang, Xi [1 ]
Tu, Haicheng [2 ]
Guo, Jianbo [3 ]
Ma, Shicong [3 ]
Li, Zhen [1 ]
Xia, Yongxiang [2 ]
Tse, Chi Kong [4 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Automat, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[2] Hangzhou Dianzi Univ, Sch Commun Engn, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
[3] China Elect Power Res Inst, Beijing 100192, Peoples R China
[4] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Elect Engn, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Power grid resilience; Largest supply capacity; Braess paradox; Double-loop optimization; SYSTEMS; RESTORATION; MICROGRIDS; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2021.107913
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Multiple physical failures and severe power disruptions occur in power grid under extreme operation conditions. In this paper, we study power grid resilience and derive quick recovery methods through adjusting the operating modes of available components and reconfiguring the remaining network. The largest amount of power that is available to the loads after reorganizing the remaining undamaged components in the post-disaster stage is identified as an important resilience indicator. An interior point method is firstly used to find the largest amount of power supply (LPS) of fixed topology. The post-disaster network should contain as many available components as possible in order to give the best topological connection. However, disconnecting some undamaged components proactively can further increase the LPS. This phenomenon can be interpreted as the Breass paradox and is effectively a combinatorial network reconfiguration. A double-loop optimization strategy is proposed to achieve the LPS available to the post-disaster network, where the interior point method serves the inner optimization loop and the outer optimization loop generates an optimal topology using a genetic algorithm. Simulation results verify the efficacy of the proposed method in achieving a quick power recovery in extreme events. Our work provides useful advice to power grid operators on how to effectively coordinate available resources after extreme events occur.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   A quantitative approach for assessment and improvement of network resilience [J].
Ahmadian, Navid ;
Lim, Gino J. ;
Cho, Jaeyoung ;
Bora, Selim .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2020, 200
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, LINEAR PROGRAMMING
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, ENH RES NAT EL SYST
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, TRANSPORTATION RES N
[5]   Electrical and topological drivers of the cascading failure dynamics in power transmission networks [J].
Azzolin, Alberto ;
Duenas-Osorio, Leonardo ;
Cadini, Francesco ;
Zio, Enrico .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2018, 175 :196-206
[6]  
Braess D., 1968, Unternehmensforschung, V12, P258
[7]   A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities [J].
Bruneau, M ;
Chang, SE ;
Eguchi, RT ;
Lee, GC ;
O'Rourke, TD ;
Reinhorn, AM ;
Shinozuka, M ;
Tierney, K ;
Wallace, WA ;
von Winterfeldt, D .
EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2003, 19 (04) :733-752
[8]   Electrical grid resilience framework with uncertainty [J].
Cicilio, P. ;
Swartz, L. ;
Vaagensmith, B. ;
Rieger, C. ;
Gentle, J. ;
McJunkin, T. ;
Cotilla-Sanchez, E. .
ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2020, 189
[9]   Measuring smart grid resilience: Methods, challenges and opportunities [J].
Das, Laya ;
Munikoti, Sai ;
Natarajan, Balasubramaniam ;
Srinivasan, Babji .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2020, 130
[10]  
DeWit A, 2016, ASIA-PAC J-JPN FOCU, V14