Semi-automated kinetic perimetry provides additional information to static automated perimetry in the assessment of the remaining visual field in end-stage glaucoma

PurposeTo test the hypothesis whether semi-automated kinetic perimetry (SKP) provides additional information to static automated perimetry (SAP) in the assessment of the remaining visual field in end-stage glaucoma, as defined by disc appearance (cup-to-disc ratio worse than 0.9) and SAP criteria (MD worse than 20dB). MethodsFifty eyes of 44 patients presenting with end-stage glaucoma were examined first with SAP within the central 30 degrees using stimulus size III, followed by SKP within 90 degrees using test targets III4e and V4e. ResultsOverall, SKP provided additional information over SAP in more than half (54%) of the cases. In 16 instances (32%), SKP revealed visual field island beyond 30 degrees that was undetected by SAP. In eight cases (16%), SKP showed both a central island and peripheral island of visual field. In three cases (6%) altitudinal scotomatous loss was found using SKP, but not in SAP. In 23 cases (46%) the central visual field island was defined both with SAP and SKP. The mean examination duration was 4min for SAP and 9min for SKP. ConclusionsIn clinical practice, SKP with III4e and V4e test targets provides more information than 30 degrees SAP regarding the remaining peripheral VF in patients with end-stage glaucoma; however, a longer test time is required for SKP.