Life cycle energy-economy-environmental evaluation of coal-based CLC power plant vs. IGCC, USC and oxy-combustion power plants with/without CO2 capture

被引:34
|
作者
Zhao, Ying-jie [1 ,3 ]
Duan, Yuan-yuan [1 ,3 ]
Liu, Qian [1 ]
Cui, Yang [1 ,3 ]
Mohamed, Usama [4 ]
Zhang, Yu-ke [1 ,3 ]
Ren, Zhi-li [1 ]
Shao, Yi-feng [1 ]
Yi, Qun [2 ,3 ]
Shi, Li-juan [2 ,3 ]
Nimmo, William [4 ]
机构
[1] Taiyuan Univ Technol, State Key Lab Clean & Efficient Coal Utilizat, Taiyuan 030024, Peoples R China
[2] Wuhan Inst Technol, Minist Educ, Key Lab Green Chem Engn Proc, Wuhan 430205, Peoples R China
[3] Taiyuan Univ Technol, Coll Environm Sci & Engn, Taiyuan 030024, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Sheffield, Energy 2050 Grp, Fac Engn, Sheffield S10 2TN, S Yorkshire, England
来源
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING | 2021年 / 9卷 / 05期
基金
国家重点研发计划; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Chemical looping combustion; Power plant; Life cycle assessment; CO2; capture; CHEMICAL LOOPING COMBUSTION; GASIFICATION; GENERATION; PERFORMANCE; EMISSIONS; SYSTEMS; FUEL; CCS; TAX;
D O I
10.1016/j.jece.2021.106121
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Coal-based chemical looping combustion (CLC) power plant presents itself as a promising technology due to its low energy penalty which is associated with its inherent CO2 capture process. However, most evaluations and comparisons (energy efficiency, economic, and environmental aspects) of the CLC power plant generally were focused on the power plant operation stage. Life cycle assessment (LCA) method with a "cradle to gate" model involving power plant construction, operation, and decommissioning stage,of coal-based power plants was established. Following that the resource consumption, energy consumption, environmental impact potential, and economic performance in the life cycle, were comprehensively compared between the coal-based CLC power plant and other plants such as IGCC, USC and oxy-combustion power plants with and without (w/o) CO2 capture, to find out the potential and deficiency of the coal-based CLC power plant in a life cycle perspective. Results showed that energy resource consumption accounts for the largest proportion of the total resource consumption (81.88-91.89%) in six coal-fired power plants. Among the environmental impact potentials, smoke and dust potential (SAP) has the highest value while eutrophication potential (EP) resulted in the lowest in six coal-based power plants. CLC presented resource depletion indicator, energy payback ratio and the total life cycle costs, at 4.79 x 10(-6) kWh/person/day, 3.22, and 0.138 $/kWh, respectively. These power plants were ranked from highest to lowest according to their sustainability as the following USC, CLC, IGCC, oxy-CCS, USC-CCS, and IGCC-CCS. However, CLC presents the best sustainability in all coal-based power plants with CO2 capture. The CLC power plant will be one of the most attractive options for carbon reduction in coal-based power systems, as the development of CLC technology further improves energy efficiency and economic performance. The results further demonstrated that the coal-based CLC power plant can solve the issues involving CO2 emission reduction and energy utilization in coal to power generation process from lifecycle viewpoint.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Cost of energy analysis of integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) power plant with respect to CO2 capture ratio under climate change scenarios
    Park, Kyungtae
    Shin, Dongil
    Lee, Gibaek
    Yoon, En Sup
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2012, 29 (09) : 1129 - 1134
  • [42] Integrating solar Organic Rankine Cycle into a coal-fired power plant with amine-based chemical absorption for CO2 capture
    Zhao, Li
    Zhao, Ruikai
    Deng, Shuai
    Tan, Yuting
    Liu, Yinan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2014, 31 : 77 - 86
  • [43] Emissions reduction potential from CO2 capture: A life-cycle assessment of a Brazilian coal-fired power plant
    Castelo Branco, David A.
    Moura, Maria Cecilia P.
    Szklo, Alexandre
    Schaeffer, Roberto
    ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 61 : 1221 - 1235
  • [44] Techno-economic evaluation of using biomass-fired auxiliary units for supplying energy requirements of CO2 capture in coal-fired power plants
    Khorshidi, Zakieh
    Ho, Minh T.
    Wiley, Dianne E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2015, 32 : 24 - 36
  • [45] Technical-economic evaluation of O2/CO2 recycle combustion power plant based on life-cycle
    Yun Wang
    YongChun Zhao
    JunYing Zhang
    ChuGuang Zheng
    Science China Technological Sciences, 2010, 53 : 3284 - 3293
  • [47] Performance analysis for post-combustion CO2 capture in coal-fired power plants by integration with solar energy
    Wu, Ying
    Dai, Ying
    Xie, Weiyi
    Chen, Haijun
    Zhu, Yuezhao
    ENERGY, 2022, 261
  • [48] Thermodynamic, Economic and Environmental Evaluation of an Improved Ventilation Air Methane-Based Hot Air Power Cycle Integrated with a De-Carbonization Oxy-Coal Combustion Power Plant
    Xu, Cheng
    Gao, Yachi
    Zhang, Qiang
    Zhang, Guoqiang
    Xu, Gang
    ENERGIES, 2018, 11 (06):
  • [49] Thermodynamic analysis and techno-economic evaluation of an integrated natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) power plant with post-combustion CO2 capture
    Hu, Yue
    Xu, Gang
    Xu, Cheng
    Yang, Yongping
    APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 111 : 308 - 316
  • [50] Life cycle cost and environmental assessment of CO2 utilization in the beverage industry: A natural gas-fired power plant equipped with post-combustion CO2 capture
    Hosseini, Seyed Mohsen
    Aslani, Alireza
    Kasaeian, Alibakhsh
    ENERGY REPORTS, 2023, 9 : 414 - 436