Life cycle energy-economy-environmental evaluation of coal-based CLC power plant vs. IGCC, USC and oxy-combustion power plants with/without CO2 capture

被引:34
|
作者
Zhao, Ying-jie [1 ,3 ]
Duan, Yuan-yuan [1 ,3 ]
Liu, Qian [1 ]
Cui, Yang [1 ,3 ]
Mohamed, Usama [4 ]
Zhang, Yu-ke [1 ,3 ]
Ren, Zhi-li [1 ]
Shao, Yi-feng [1 ]
Yi, Qun [2 ,3 ]
Shi, Li-juan [2 ,3 ]
Nimmo, William [4 ]
机构
[1] Taiyuan Univ Technol, State Key Lab Clean & Efficient Coal Utilizat, Taiyuan 030024, Peoples R China
[2] Wuhan Inst Technol, Minist Educ, Key Lab Green Chem Engn Proc, Wuhan 430205, Peoples R China
[3] Taiyuan Univ Technol, Coll Environm Sci & Engn, Taiyuan 030024, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Sheffield, Energy 2050 Grp, Fac Engn, Sheffield S10 2TN, S Yorkshire, England
来源
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING | 2021年 / 9卷 / 05期
基金
国家重点研发计划; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Chemical looping combustion; Power plant; Life cycle assessment; CO2; capture; CHEMICAL LOOPING COMBUSTION; GASIFICATION; GENERATION; PERFORMANCE; EMISSIONS; SYSTEMS; FUEL; CCS; TAX;
D O I
10.1016/j.jece.2021.106121
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Coal-based chemical looping combustion (CLC) power plant presents itself as a promising technology due to its low energy penalty which is associated with its inherent CO2 capture process. However, most evaluations and comparisons (energy efficiency, economic, and environmental aspects) of the CLC power plant generally were focused on the power plant operation stage. Life cycle assessment (LCA) method with a "cradle to gate" model involving power plant construction, operation, and decommissioning stage,of coal-based power plants was established. Following that the resource consumption, energy consumption, environmental impact potential, and economic performance in the life cycle, were comprehensively compared between the coal-based CLC power plant and other plants such as IGCC, USC and oxy-combustion power plants with and without (w/o) CO2 capture, to find out the potential and deficiency of the coal-based CLC power plant in a life cycle perspective. Results showed that energy resource consumption accounts for the largest proportion of the total resource consumption (81.88-91.89%) in six coal-fired power plants. Among the environmental impact potentials, smoke and dust potential (SAP) has the highest value while eutrophication potential (EP) resulted in the lowest in six coal-based power plants. CLC presented resource depletion indicator, energy payback ratio and the total life cycle costs, at 4.79 x 10(-6) kWh/person/day, 3.22, and 0.138 $/kWh, respectively. These power plants were ranked from highest to lowest according to their sustainability as the following USC, CLC, IGCC, oxy-CCS, USC-CCS, and IGCC-CCS. However, CLC presents the best sustainability in all coal-based power plants with CO2 capture. The CLC power plant will be one of the most attractive options for carbon reduction in coal-based power systems, as the development of CLC technology further improves energy efficiency and economic performance. The results further demonstrated that the coal-based CLC power plant can solve the issues involving CO2 emission reduction and energy utilization in coal to power generation process from lifecycle viewpoint.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Detailed plant layout studies of oxy-enriched CO2 pulverized coal combustion-based power plant with CO2 enrichment
    Jayanti, S.
    Kareemulla, D.
    CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2016, 18 (06) : 1985 - 1996
  • [32] Effects of flue gas recirculation on energy, exergy, environment, and economics in oxy-coal circulating fluidized-bed power plants with CO2 capture
    Kim, Semie
    Lim, Young-Il
    Lee, Doyeon
    Seo, Myung Won
    Mun, Tae-Young
    Lee, Jae-Goo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2021, 45 (04) : 5852 - 5865
  • [33] Thermodynamic and environmental evaluation of biomass and coal co-fuelled gasification chemical looping combustion with CO2 capture for combined cooling, heating and power production
    Fan, Junming
    Hong, Hui
    Zhu, Lin
    Jiang, Qiongqiong
    Jin, Hongguang
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 195 : 861 - 876
  • [34] Evaluation of Performance and Cost of Combustion-Based Power Plants with CO2 Capture in the United Kingdom
    Catalanotti, Elena
    Hughes, Kevin J.
    Porter, Richard T. J.
    Price, Jon
    Pourkashanian, Mohamed
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRESS & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2014, 33 (04) : 1425 - 1431
  • [35] Life cycle assessment of an integrated oxy-fuel combustion power plant with CO2 capture, transport and storage - Poland case study
    Gladysz, Pawel
    Ziebik, Andrzej
    ENERGY, 2015, 92 : 328 - 340
  • [36] Techno-economic study of CO2 capture from an existing coal-fired power plant:: MEA scrubbing vs. O2/CO2 recycle combustion
    Singh, D
    Croiset, E
    Douglas, PL
    Douglas, MA
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 44 (19) : 3073 - 3091
  • [37] Energy Consumption Analysis of Coal-fired Power Plant With CO2 Capture System Based on Solar Energy
    Chen, Haiping
    Wu, Wenhao
    Wang, Zhongping
    Shi, Zhiyun
    Wang, Jing
    NATURAL RESOURCES AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT II, PTS 1-4, 2012, 524-527 : 2360 - 2367
  • [38] Exergy-based analysis of conventional coal-fired power plant retrofitted with oxy-fuel and post-combustion CO2 capture systems
    Mansouri, M. Tajik
    Mousavian, S. M.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART A-JOURNAL OF POWER AND ENERGY, 2012, 226 (A8) : 989 - 1002
  • [39] Novel integrated system for power, hydrogen, and ammonia production using direct oxy-combustion sCO2 power cycle with automatic CO2 capture, water electrolyzer, and Haber-Bosch process
    Sleiti, Ahmad K.
    Al-Ammari, Wahib A.
    Musharavati, Farayi
    ENERGY, 2024, 307
  • [40] Evaluation of cooling requirements of post-combustion CO2 capture applied to coal-fired power plants
    Brandl, Patrick
    Soltani, Salman Masoudi
    Fennell, Paul S.
    Mac Dowell, Niall
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN, 2017, 122 : 1 - 10