Challenges and prospects for consumer acceptance of cultured meat

被引:218
作者
Verbeke, Wim [1 ]
Sans, Pierre [2 ,3 ]
Van Loo, Ellen J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Dept Agr Econ, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] INP ENV Toulouse, F-31076 Toulouse, France
[3] INRA, ALISS UR1303, F-94205 Ivry, France
关键词
acceptance; artificial; attitude; consumer; cultured; in vitro; meat; synthetic; IN-VITRO MEAT; FOOD TECHNOLOGIES; COMMUNICATION; NEOPHOBIA; ATTITUDES; BELGIUM; FUTURE; SCALE; MEDIA;
D O I
10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60884-4
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Consumer acceptance of cultured meat is expected to depend on a wide diversity of determinants ranging from technology-related perceptions to product-specific expectations, and including wider contextual factors like media coverage, public involvement, and trust in science, policy and society. This paper discusses the case of cultured meat against this,multitude of possible determinants shaping future consumer acceptance or rejection. The paper also presents insights from a primary exploratory study performed in April 2013 with consumers from Flanders (Belgium) (n=180). The concept of cultured meat was only known (unaided) by 13% of the study participants. After receiving basic information about what cultured meat is, participants expressed favorable expectations about the concept. Only 9% rejected the idea of trying cultured meat, while two thirds hesitated and about quarter indicated to be willing to try it. The provision of additional information about the environmental benefits of cultured meat compared to traditional meat resulted in 43% of the participants indicating to be willing to try this novel food, while another 51% indicated to be 'maybe' willing to do so. Price and sensory expectations emerged as major obstacles. Consumers eating mostly vegetarian meals were less convinced that cultured meat might be healthy, suggesting that vegetarians may not be the ideal primary target group for this novel meat substitute. Although exploratory rather than conclusive, the findings generally underscore doubts among consumers about trying this product when it would become available, and therefore also the challenge for cultured meat to mimic traditional meat in terms of sensory quality at an affordable price in order to become acceptable for future consumers.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 294
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Challenges and prospects for consumer acceptance of cultured meat
    Wim Verbeke
    Pierre Sans
    Ellen J Van Loo
    Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2015, 14 (02) : 285 - 294
  • [2] Consumer acceptance of cultured meat in Germany
    Weinrich, Ramona
    Strack, Micha
    Neugebauer, Felix
    MEAT SCIENCE, 2020, 162
  • [3] Prospects of artificial meat: Opportunities and challenges around consumer acceptance
    Zhang, Lang
    Hu, Yingying
    Badar, Iftikhar Hussain
    Xia, Xiufang
    Kong, Baohua
    Chen, Qian
    TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 116 : 434 - 444
  • [4] THE ROLE OF INFORMATION ON CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE OF NOVEL FOOD: THE CULTURED MEAT
    Mancini, Maria Cecilia
    Antonioli, Federico
    BIOLAW JOURNAL-RIVISTA DI BIODIRITTO, 2020, (02): : 103 - 116
  • [5] Consumer acceptance of cultured meat: A systematic review
    Bryant, Christopher
    Barnett, Julie
    MEAT SCIENCE, 2018, 143 : 8 - 17
  • [6] Consumer acceptance of cultured meat in urban areas of three cities in China
    Zhang, Meng
    Li, Lei
    Bai, Junfei
    FOOD CONTROL, 2020, 118
  • [7] Review of factors affecting consumer acceptance of cultured meat
    Pakseresht, Ashkan
    Kaliji, Sina Ahmadi
    Canavari, Maurizio
    APPETITE, 2022, 170
  • [8] Consumer Acceptance of Cultured Meat: An Updated Review (2018-2020)
    Bryant, Christopher
    Barnett, Julie
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (15):
  • [9] The Impact of Framing on Acceptance of Cultured Meat
    Bryant, Christopher
    Dillard, Courtney
    FRONTIERS IN NUTRITION, 2019, 6
  • [10] Consumer acceptance of cultured meat: some hints from Italy
    Palmieri, Nadia
    Perito, Maria Angela
    Lupi, Claudio
    BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL, 2021, 123 (01): : 109 - 123