The valuation of multidimensional American real options using the LSM simulation method

被引:72
作者
Cortazar, Gonzalo [1 ]
Gravet, Miguel [1 ]
Urzua, Jorge [1 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Escuela Ingn, Dept Ingn Ind & Sistemas, Santiago 4860, Chile
关键词
real options; simulation; natural resources; valuation; finance;
D O I
10.1016/j.cor.2006.02.016
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
In this paper we show how a multidimensional American real option may be solved using the LSM simulation method originally proposed by Longstaff and Schwartz [2001, The Review of the Financial Studies 14(1): 113-147] for valuing a financial option and how this method can be used in a complex setting. We extend a well-known natural resource real option model, initially solved using finite difference methods, to include a more realistic three-factor stochastic process for commodity prices, more in line with current research. Numerical results show that the procedure may be successfully used for multidimensional models, expanding the applicability of the real options approach. Even though there has been an increasing literature on the benefits of using the contingent claim approach to value real assets, limitations on solving procedures and computing power have often forced academics and practitioners to simplify these real option models to a level in which they loose relevance for real-world decision making. Real option models present a higher challenge than their financial option counterparts because of two main reasons: First, many real options have a longer maturity which makes risk modeling critical and may force considering many risk factors, as opposed to the classic Black and Scholes approach with only one risk factor. Second, real investments many times exhibit a more complex set of interacting American options, which make them more difficult to value. In recent years new approaches for solving American options have been proposed which, coupled with an increasing availability of computing power, have been successfully applied to solving long-term financial options. In this paper we explore the applicability of one the most promising of these new methods in a multidimensional real option setting. (C) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 129
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Valuation of product-mix flexibility using real options
    Bengtsson, J
    Olhager, J
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2002, 78 (01) : 13 - 28
  • [22] USE OF REAL OPTIONS IN PROJECT VALUATION
    Petravicius, Tomas
    TRANSFORMATIONS IN BUSINESS & ECONOMICS, 2009, 8 (03): : 69 - 89
  • [23] A real options approach to data valuation
    Diane Coyle
    Luca Gamberi
    Business Economics, 2024, 59 (4) : 227 - 234
  • [24] Implementing Real Options in Firm Valuation
    Kramna, Eva
    INNOVATION VISION 2020: SUSTAINABLE GROWTH, ENTREPRENEURSHIP, AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, VOLS 1-4, 2012, : 1759 - 1768
  • [25] Pricing American bond options using a penalty method
    Zhang, Kai
    Wang, Song
    AUTOMATICA, 2012, 48 (03) : 472 - 479
  • [26] Financial Valuation of Intangibles With Real Options: Is a Real Option?
    Arregui-Ayastuy, Gerado
    Vallejo-Alonso, Belen
    Rodriguez-Castellanos, Arturo
    Garcia-Merino, Domingo
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE EUROPEAN CON FERENCE ON INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL, 2009, : 52 - 59
  • [27] PMA license valuation: A Bayesian learning real options approach
    Miller, Luke T.
    REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 19 (01) : 28 - 37
  • [28] Valuation of brand equity and retailer growth strategies using real options
    Trigeorgis, Lenos
    Baldi, Francesco
    Katsikeas, Constantine S.
    JOURNAL OF RETAILING, 2021, 97 (04) : 523 - 544
  • [29] Valuation of Flexible Power Plants in Brazil: a Real Options Approach
    Aronne, Alexandre Vasconcelos
    Brasil, Haroldo Guimaraes
    Aronne, Ivan Dionysio
    REVISTA GESTAO & TECNOLOGIA-JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT AND TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 9 (02):
  • [30] Real options in metal mining project valuation: Review of literature
    Savolainen, Jyrki
    RESOURCES POLICY, 2016, 50 : 49 - 65