The association and reliability of the frontal plane projection angle during the lateral step down test on knee function in patients with patellofemoral pain

被引:4
|
作者
Mansfield, C. J. [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Rethman, K. K. [2 ]
Stephens, J. [3 ]
Di Stasi, S. [1 ,4 ]
Vanetten, L. [1 ,2 ]
Briggs, M. S. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Coll Med, Sch Hlth & Rehabil Sci, Columbus, OH USA
[2] Ohio State Univ Wexner Med Ctr, Sports Med, Columbus, OH USA
[3] Ohio State Univ Wexner Med Ctr, Coll Med, Ctr Biostat, Columbus, OH USA
[4] Ohio State Univ Wexner Med Ctr, Sports Med Res Inst, Columbus, OH USA
[5] Ohio State Univ Wexner Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed, Columbus, OH USA
[6] OSU Sports Med Gahanna, 920 North Hamilton Rd,Suite 600, Gahanna, OH 43230 USA
关键词
Kinovea; Physical therapy; Rehabilitation; Knee valgus; Video analysis; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY LEVELS; SINGLE LEG SQUAT; RATING-SCALE; CONSENSUS STATEMENT; RESEARCH RETREAT; VISUAL ANALOG; NUMERIC PAIN; HIP; VALIDITY; FEMALES;
D O I
10.1016/j.knee.2022.04.010
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The lateral step-down test is used by physical therapists (PT) to identify movement faults in patients with patellofemoral pain (PFP). The FPPA is a measure of knee valgus and PTs have access to open source video analysis software and high quality smart phones and video cameras to implement 2D video analysis into practice. The purpose of our study was to determine the reliability of PTs measuring the frontal plane projection angle (FPPA) during the lateral step-down test, and to determine if the FPPA was associated with pain, self-reported knee function and fear of movement.& nbsp;Methods: Twenty-two subjects (mean age[SD] = 27.8 [6.6] years, females n = 14, males n = 8) with PFP were analyzed by six PTs using 2D video analysis software. The FPPA was measured during the lateral step down test. Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Anterior Knee Pain Scale (AKPS) and the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) were collected. Intraclass correlation (ICC) was used to assess for PT measurement reliability. Correlations between outcomes were calculated using Spearman correlation coefficient and standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC) were reported.& nbsp;Results: Reliability amongst PTs measuring the FPPA was good (ICC [95 %CI] = 0.85 [0.72- 0.93]; SEM = 3.33 degrees, MDC = 9.20 degrees). There were no significant correlations (p > 0.05) between FPPA and NPRS(q =-0.046), AKPS(q = 0.066), or TSK(q =-0.204).& nbsp;Conclusions: Although reliability measuring FPPA was good, the large SEM and MDC associated with this measurement may limit its clinical utility in those with PFP. (C)& nbsp;2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 96
页数:10
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] The relationship between ankle dorsiflexion range of motion, frontal plane projection angle, and patellofemoral pain syndrome
    Hassan, Karima Abdelaty
    Youssef, Rana Seif El-Eslam
    Mahmoud, Nesreen Fawzy
    Eltagy, Hassan
    El-Desouky, Mahmoud Ahmed
    FOOT AND ANKLE SURGERY, 2022, 28 (08) : 1427 - 1432
  • [2] Observational Ratings of Frontal Plane Knee Position Are Related to the Frontal Plane Projection Angle but Not the Knee Abduction Angle During a Step-down Task
    Jones, Debi
    Tillman, Susan M.
    Tofte, Kari
    Mizner, Ryan L.
    Greenberg, Scott
    Moser, Michael W.
    Chmielewski, Terese L.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2014, 44 (12) : 973 - 978
  • [3] Proximal and distal muscle thickness is different in women with patellofemoral pain but is not associated with knee frontal plane projection angle
    Rodrigues, Rodrigo
    da Rocha, Emmanuel Souza
    Klein, Kelli Daiana
    Sonda, Francesca Chaida
    Pompeo, Klauber Dalcero
    Frasson, Viviane Bortoluzzi
    Vaz, Marco Aurelio
    JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES, 2021, 25 : 205 - 211
  • [4] Two-dimensional frontal plane projection angle can identify subgroups of patellofemoral pain patients who demonstrate dynamic knee valgus
    Gwynne, Craig R.
    Curran, Sarah A.
    CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2018, 58 : 44 - 48
  • [5] The decline step-down test measuring the maximum pain-free flexion angle: A reliable and valid performance test in patients with patellofemoral pain
    Ophey, Martin J.
    Bosch, Karlijn
    Khalfallah, Fatos Z.
    Wijnands, Ap M. M. P.
    van den Berg, Robert B.
    Bernards, Nol T. M.
    Kerkhoffs, Gino M. M. J.
    Tak, Igor J. R.
    PHYSICAL THERAPY IN SPORT, 2019, 36 : 43 - 50
  • [6] Relationship between frontal plane projection angle of the knee and hip and trunk strength in women with and without patellofemoral pain
    Leao Almeida, Gabriel Peixoto
    de Moura Campos Carvalho e Silva, Ana Paula
    Renovato Franca, Fabio Jorge
    Magalhaes, Mauricio Oliveira
    Burke, Thomaz Nogueira
    Marques, Amelia Pasqual
    JOURNAL OF BACK AND MUSCULOSKELETAL REHABILITATION, 2016, 29 (02) : 259 - 266
  • [7] Frontal plane projection angle predicts patellofemoral pain: Prospective study in male military cadets
    Alrayani, Hasan
    Herrington, Lee
    Liu, Anmin
    Jones, Richard
    PHYSICAL THERAPY IN SPORT, 2023, 59 : 73 - 79
  • [8] Does the 2D Frontal Plane Projection Angle Predict Frontal Plane Knee Moments during Stepping, Landing, and Change of Direction Tasks?
    Straub, Rachel K.
    Powers, Christopher M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2022, 17 (07): : 1259 - 1270
  • [9] Y-Balance Test Asymmetry and Frontal Plane Knee Projection Angle During Single-leg squat as Predictors of Patellofemoral Pain in Male Military Recruits
    Nakagawa, Theresa H.
    dos Santos, Ana F.
    Lessi, Giovanna C.
    Petersen, Rafael S.
    Silva, Rodrigo Scattone
    PHYSICAL THERAPY IN SPORT, 2020, 44 : 121 - 127
  • [10] Comparison of the Frontal Plane Projection Angle and the Dynamic Valgus Index to Identify Movement Dysfunction in Females with Patellofemoral Pain
    Bolgla, Lori A.
    Gibson, Haley N.
    Hannah, Daniel C.
    Curry-McCoy, Tiana
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2023, 18 (03): : 619 - 625