Effects of topography and tree stand characteristics on susceptibility of forests to natural disturbances (ice and wind) in the Borzsony Mountains (Hungary)

被引:21
作者
Kenderes, K. [1 ]
Aszalos, R. [2 ]
Ruff, J. [3 ]
Barton, Zs. [3 ]
Standovar, T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Eotvos Lorand Univ, Dept Plant Taxonomy & Ecol, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary
[2] Hungarian Acad Sci, Inst Ecol & Bot, H-2163 Vacratot, Hungary
[3] Ipoly Erdo Inc, Kiralyret Forest Directorate, H-2624 Szokolya, Hungary
关键词
beech; C&RT; Fagus sylvatica; ice break; Quercus petraea; sessile oak; windthrow;
D O I
10.1556/ComEc.8.2007.2.7
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
We analysed the role of topography, tree stand characteristics and management on the susceptibility of forest stands to abiotic natural disturbances. In 1996, stands of Borzsony Mts, Hungary were hit by a severe ice storm, then by strong winds three years later. Affected areas were mapped on aerial photos, and we built a GIS database containing variables describing topography and tree stand characteristics. The role of variables in predicting ice break and windfall was investigated by non-parametric statistical tests and by a series of C&RT (Classification and Regression Tree) analyses. Elevation, aspect and slope proved to have strong statistical relationships with the distribution of both ice break and windfall, with misclassification error (MER) of 18% and 15%, respectively, if studied without stand descriptors. Mixing ratio and age of beech were the most important stand descriptors to explain the distribution of ice break (MER= 15%), whereas that of windfall was best described by the age and height of the two dominant tree species (MER=11%). The explanatory power could be increased if all variables (topographic + stand descriptors) were considered, though the increase in explanatory power was higher in the case of ice break (MER decreased from 15% to 11%) than for windfall (MER decreased from 11% to 10%). Since management related stand variables (beech mixture ratio, age, height, amount of recently felled stock, slenderness) and susceptibility to disturbance events seemed to be related, our results suggest that the sensitivity of tree stands could be decreased by increasing compositional and structural heterogeneity.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 220
页数:12
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Angelstam P, 2003, LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT: LINKING THEORY WITH PRACTICE, P193
[2]   SmcHD1, containing a structural-maintenance-of-chromosomes hinge domain, has a critical role in X inactivation [J].
Blewitt, Marnie E. ;
Gendrel, Anne-Valerie ;
Pang, Zhenyi ;
Sparrow, Duncan B. ;
Whitelaw, Nadia ;
Craig, Jeffrey M. ;
Apedaile, Anwyn ;
Hilton, Douglas J. ;
Dunwoodie, Sally L. ;
Brockdorff, Neil ;
Kay, Graham F. ;
Whitelaw, Emma .
NATURE GENETICS, 2008, 40 (05) :663-669
[3]   Impacts and management implications of ice storms on forests in the southern United States [J].
Bragg, DC ;
Shelton, MG ;
Zeide, B .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 186 (1-3) :99-123
[4]   Interspecific variation in susceptibility to windthrow as a function of tree size and storm severity for northern temperate tree species [J].
Canham, CD ;
Papaik, MJ ;
Latty, EF .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2001, 31 (01) :1-10
[5]   CATASTROPHIC WINDTHROW IN THE PRESETTLEMENT FORESTS OF WISCONSIN [J].
CANHAM, CD ;
LOUCKS, OL .
ECOLOGY, 1984, 65 (03) :803-809
[6]  
Dobbertin Matthias, 2002, Forest Snow and Landscape Research, V77, P187
[7]   Vulnerability of the Netherlands and Northwest Europe to storm damage under climate change - A model approach based on storm damage in the Netherlands [J].
Dorland, C ;
Tol, RSJ ;
Palutikof, JP .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 1999, 43 (03) :513-535
[8]   Ice storm damage and early recovery in an old-growth forest [J].
Duguay, SM ;
Arii, K ;
Hooper, M ;
Lechowicz, MJ .
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2001, 67 (1-2) :97-108
[9]  
Foster D. R., 1995, P305, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511600425.019
[10]   PATTERNS OF FOREST DAMAGE RESULTING FROM CATASTROPHIC WIND IN CENTRAL NEW-ENGLAND, USA [J].
FOSTER, DR ;
BOOSE, ER .
JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 1992, 80 (01) :79-98