Differential effects of estrogen-dependent transactivation vs. transrepression by the estrogen receptor on invasiveness of HER2 overexpressing breast cancer cells

被引:4
|
作者
Patki, Mugdha [1 ,2 ]
Salazar, Marcela d'Alincourt [2 ,3 ]
Trumbly, Robert [2 ]
Ratnam, Manohar [1 ]
机构
[1] Barbara Ann Karmanos Canc Inst, Dept Oncol, Detroit, MI 48201 USA
[2] Univ Med Ctr, Dept Biochem & Canc Biol, Toledo, OH 43614 USA
[3] City Hope Natl Med Ctr, Beckman Res Inst, Div Translat Res, Duarte, CA 91010 USA
关键词
Estrogen receptor; Tamoxifen; Anti-estrogens; Invasiveness; Breast cancer; HER2; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; TAMOXIFEN; ALPHA; MECHANISMS; INVASION; ACTIVATION; RESISTANCE; PHENOTYPE; MOTILITY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.01.004
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Estrogen (E-2) supports breast cancer cell growth but suppresses invasiveness and both actions are antagonized by anti-estrogens. As a consequence, anti-estrogen treatment may increase the invasive potential of estrogen receptor (ER)+ tumor cell sub-populations that are endocrine resistant due to HER2 amplification. Either transactivation or transrepression by E-2/ER could lead to both up- and down-regulation of many genes. Inhibition of the transactivation function of ER is adequate to inhibit E-2-dependent growth. However, the impact of inhibiting E-2-dependent transactivation vs. transrepression by ER on regulation of invasiveness by E-2 is less clear. Here we dissect the roles of ER-mediated transactivation and transrepression in the regulation of invasiveness of ER+/HER2+ breast cancer cells by E-2. Knocking down the general ER co-activators CBP and p300 prevented activation by E-2 of its classical target genes but did not interfere with the ability of E-2 to repress its direct target genes known to support invasiveness and tumor progression; there was also no effect on invasiveness or the ability of E-2 to regulate invasiveness. On the other hand, overexpression of a co-repressor binding site mutant of ER (L372R) prevented E-2-dependent transrepression but not transactivation. The mutant ER abrogated the ability of E-2 to suppress invasiveness. E-2 can partially down-regulate HER2 but knocking down HER2 below E-2-regulated levels did not affect invasiveness or the ability of E-2 to regulate invasiveness, although it did inhibit growth. Therefore, in ER+/HER2+ cells, the E-2-dependent transrepression by ER rather than its transactivation function is critical for regulation of invasiveness and this is independent of HER2 regulation by E-2. The findings suggest that selective inhibitors of transactivation by ER may be more beneficial in reducing tumor progression than conventional anti-estrogens that also antagonize E-2-dependent transrepression. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:404 / 411
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Aberrant Splicing of Estrogen Receptor, HER2, and CD44 Genes in Breast Cancer
    Inoue, Kazushi
    Fry, Elizabeth A.
    GENETICS & EPIGENETICS, 2015, 7 : 19 - 32
  • [22] Multiple omics analysis of the protective effects of SFN on estrogen-dependent breast cancer cells
    Huang, Hui
    Cao, Shuyuan
    Zhang, Zhan
    Li, Lei
    Chen, Feng
    Wu, Qian
    MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REPORTS, 2020, 47 (05) : 3331 - 3346
  • [23] ESTROGEN-DEPENDENT, TAMOXIFEN-RESISTANT TUMORIGENIC GROWTH OF MCF-7 CELLS TRANSFECTED WITH HER2/NEU
    BENZ, CC
    SCOTT, GK
    SARUP, JC
    JOHNSON, RM
    TRIPATHY, D
    CORONADO, E
    SHEPARD, HM
    OSBORNE, CK
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 1992, 24 (02) : 85 - 95
  • [24] HER2 Activating Mutations in Estrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancer
    Murray E.M.
    Cherian M.A.
    Ma C.X.
    Bose R.
    Current Breast Cancer Reports, 2018, 10 (2) : 41 - 47
  • [25] PGRMC1 can trigger estrogen-dependent proliferation of breast cancer cells: estradiol vs. equilin vs. ethinylestradiol
    Li, X.
    Ruan, X.
    Gu, M.
    Mueck, A. O.
    CLIMACTERIC, 2019, 22 (05) : 483 - 488
  • [26] Managing Breast Cancers with Low Estrogen Receptor and HER2 by Drugging Both
    Miller, Todd W.
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2014, 20 (03) : 528 - 530
  • [27] Patterns of relapse and metastatic spread in HER2-overexpressing breast cancer according to estrogen receptor status
    Park, Yeon Hee
    Lee, Soohyeon
    Cho, Eun Yoon
    Choi, Yoon La
    Lee, Jeong Eon
    Nam, Seok Jin
    Yang, Jung-Hyun
    Ahn, Jin Seok
    Im, Young-Hyuck
    CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2010, 66 (03) : 507 - 516
  • [28] Molecular apocrine breast cancers are aggressive estrogen receptor negative tumors overexpressing either HER2 or GCDFP15
    Lehmann-Che, Jacqueline
    Hamy, Anne-Sophie
    Porcher, Raphael
    Barritault, Marc
    Bouhidel, Fatiha
    Habuellelah, Hanadi
    Leman-Detours, Solenne
    de Roquancourt, Anne
    Cahen-Doidy, Laurence
    Bourstyn, Edwige
    de Cremoux, Patricia
    de Bazelaire, Cedric
    Albiter, Marcela
    Giacchetti, Sylvie
    Cuvier, Caroline
    Janin, Anne
    Espie, Marc
    de The, Hugues
    Bertheau, Philippe
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2013, 15 (03)
  • [29] Differential Effects of Aromatase Inhibitors and Antiestrogens on Estrogen Receptor Expression in Breast Cancer Cells
    Smollich, Martin
    Goette, Martin
    Fischgraebe, Jeanett
    Radke, Isabel
    Kiesel, Ludwig
    Wuelfing, Pia
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2009, 29 (06) : 2167 - 2171
  • [30] Tristetraprolin Represses Estrogen Receptor α Transactivation in Breast Cancer Cells
    Barrios-Garcia, Tonatiuh
    Tecalco-Cruz, Angeles
    Gomez-Romero, Vania
    Reyes-Carmona, Sandra
    Meneses-Morales, Ivan
    Leon-Del-Rio, Alfonso
    JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2014, 289 (22) : 15554 - 15565