Outcomes of Active Surveillance for Men With Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer

被引:238
作者
Cooperberg, Matthew R. [1 ]
Cowan, Janet E. [1 ]
Hilton, Joan F. [1 ]
Reese, Adam C. [1 ]
Zaid, Harras B. [1 ]
Porten, Sima P. [1 ]
Shinohara, Katsuto [1 ]
Meng, Maxwell V. [1 ]
Greene, Kirsten L. [1 ]
Carroll, Peter R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Helen Diller Family Comprehens Canc Ctr, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; TIME; PREDICTION; MANAGEMENT; ACCURACY; VELOCITY; THERAPY; BIOPSY; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2010.31.4252
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Active surveillance (AS) is an option for the initial management of early-stage prostate cancer. Current risk stratification schema identify patients with low-risk disease who are presumed to be most suitable for AS. However, some men with higher risk disease also elect AS; outcomes for such men have not been widely reported. Patients and Methods Men managed with AS at University of California, San Francisco, were classified as low-or intermediate-risk based on serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Gleason grade, extent of biopsy involvement, and T stage. Clinical and demographic characteristics, and progression in terms of Gleason score, PSA kinetics, and active treatment were compared between men with low-and intermediate-risk tumors. Results Compared to men with low-risk tumors, those with intermediate-risk tumors were older (mean, 64.9 v 62.3 years) with higher mean PSA values (10.9 v 5.1 ng/mL), and more tumor involvement (mean, 20.4% v 15.3% positive biopsy cores; all P < .01). Within 4 years of the first positive biopsy, the clinical risk group did not differ in terms of the proportions experiencing progression-free survival, (low [54%] v intermediate [61%]; log-rank P = .22) or the proportions who underwent active treatment (low [30%] v intermediate [35%]; log-rank P = .88). Among men undergoing surgery, none were node positive and none had biochemical recurrence within 3 years. Conclusion Selected men with intermediate-risk features be appropriate candidates for AS, and are not necessarily more likely to progress. AS for these men may provide an opportunity to further reduce overtreatment of disease that is unlikely to progress to advanced cancer. J Clin Oncol 29:228-234. (C) 2010 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
引用
收藏
页码:228 / 234
页数:7
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Active surveillance and radical therapy in prostate cancer: can focal therapy offer the middle way?
    Ahmed, Hashim Uddin
    Emberton, Mark
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 26 (05) : 457 - 467
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2010, CANCER
  • [3] What percentage of patients with newly diagnosed carcinoma of the prostate are candidates for surveillance?: An analysis of the CaPSURE™ database
    Barocas, Daniel A.
    Cowan, Janet E.
    Smith, Joseph A.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 180 (04) : 1330 - 1334
  • [4] Insignificant Prostate Cancer and Active Surveillance: From Definition to Clinical Implications
    Bastian, Patrick J.
    Carter, Ballentine H.
    Bjartell, Anders
    Seitz, Michael
    Stanislaus, Peter
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Stief, Christian G.
    Schroeder, Fritz
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2009, 55 (06) : 1321 - 1332
  • [5] Expectant management of nonpalpable prostate cancer with curative intent: Preliminary results
    Carter, HB
    Walsh, PC
    Landis, P
    Epstein, JI
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (03) : 1231 - 1234
  • [6] Critical assessment of tools to predict clinically insignificant prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy in contemporary men
    Chun, Felix K. -H.
    Haese, Alexander
    Ahyai, Sascha A.
    Walz, Jochen
    Suardi, Nazareno
    Capitanio, Umberto
    Graefen, Markus
    Erbersdobler, Andreas
    Huland, Hartwig
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    [J]. CANCER, 2008, 113 (04) : 701 - 709
  • [7] Pathological Outcomes of Candidates for Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer
    Conti, Simon L.
    Dall'Era, Marc
    Fradet, Vincent
    Cowan, Janet E.
    Simko, Jeffery
    Carroll, Peter R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (04) : 1628 - 1633
  • [8] Conti SL., 2009, J Urol, V181, P16281633
  • [9] Contemporary trends in low risk prostate cancer: Risk assessment and treatment
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Broering, Jeannette M.
    Kantoff, Philip W.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 178 (03) : S14 - S19
  • [10] Risk Assessment for Prostate Cancer Metastasis and Mortality at the Time of Diagnosis
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Broering, Jeanette M.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2009, 101 (12): : 878 - 887