Comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced helical CT in the diagnosis of high echo-level small focal liver lesions

被引:0
|
作者
Liu, Jun-Jie [1 ,3 ]
Wang, Dan [1 ,3 ]
Li, Hong-Xue [1 ,3 ]
Zhou, Ting [1 ,3 ]
Zhao, Sheng-Fa [1 ,3 ]
Ding, Zhan-Ling [1 ,3 ]
Chen, Jie [2 ,3 ]
Bai, Tao [2 ,3 ]
Li, Le-Qun [2 ,3 ]
Li, Hang [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Guangxi Med Univ, Affiliated Tumor Hosp, Dept Ultrasound Diag, He Di Road 71, Nanning 530021, Peoples R China
[2] Guangxi Med Univ, Affiliated Tumor Hosp, Dept Hepatobiliary Surg, He Di Road 71, Nanning 530021, Peoples R China
[3] Guangxi Liver Canc Diag & Treatment Engn & Techno, Nanning 530021, Peoples R China
关键词
Contrast enhanced ultrasound; contrast enhanced CT; high echo-level small focal liver lesions; time-intensity curves; CEUS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the diagnosis accurate rate of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and contrast enhanced helical CT (CECT) in high echo-level small focal liver lesions (HSFLLs) (diameter <= 3 cm), and to explore the application value of CEUS in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of the benign and malignant liver hyperechoic lesions. Methods: The institutional review board of Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University approved the study protocol. The CEUS Time intensity curves (TICs) results of 75 cases (107 lesions) with HSFLLs detected by two-dimensional ultrasound (2DUS) were reviewed and analyzed. And the results were compared with CECT. Results: The area under the curve of CEUS and CECT were 0.941 and 0.936 respectively. The cut off value of CEUS diagnosis for malignant lesions was 2.5. The sensitivity, specificity and the accuracy of CEUS for diagnosing malignant hepatic tumors were respectively 90.0%, 89.4% and 89.71%, versus 90.0%, 87.2% and 88.79% in CECT. The positive predictive value of CEUS and CECT were 0.895 and 0.875. The negative predictive value of CEUS and CECT were 0.101 and 0.103. In the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of cirrhotic nodules lesions and small hepatocellular carcinoma (SHCC) lesions, the accurate rate of CEUS was 92.86%, and CECT was 90.48%. Conclusion: CEUS could effectively and dynamically evaluate the hemodynamics of liver tumors, and provide qualitative and quantitative diagnosis to HSFLLs. In the diagnosis of HSFLLs and SHCC, CEUS was equal to CECT.
引用
收藏
页码:8176 / 8182
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Solid focal liver lesions indeterminate by contrast-enhanced CT or MR imaging: the added diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound
    Emilio Quaia
    Abdominal Imaging, 2012, 37 : 580 - 590
  • [22] Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in diagnosis and characterization of focal hepatic lesions
    Gomez Molins, Ines
    Fernandez Font, Juan Manuel
    Carrero Alvaro, Juan
    Lledo Navarro, Jose Luis
    Fernandez Gil, Marta
    Fernandez Rodriguez, Conrado M.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2010, 2 (12): : 455 - 462
  • [23] The role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the characterisation of focal liver lesions
    Leen, E
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2001, 11 (Suppl 3) : E27 - E34
  • [24] The role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the detection of focal liver lesions
    Solbiati, L
    Tonolini, M
    Cova, L
    Goldberg, SN
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2001, 11 (Suppl 3) : E15 - E25
  • [25] Contrast-enhanced ultrasound approach to the diagnosis of focal liver lesions: the importance of washout
    Yang, Hyun Kyung
    Burns, Peter N.
    Jang, Hyun-Jung
    Kono, Yuko
    Khalili, Korosh
    Wilson, Stephanie R.
    Kim, Tae Kyoung
    ULTRASONOGRAPHY, 2019, 38 (04) : 289 - 301
  • [26] Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for characterisation of focal liver lesions
    Kallenbach, Michael
    Qvartskhava, Natalia
    Weigel, Christian
    Doerffel, Yvonne
    Berger, Jens
    Kunze, Georg
    Luedde, Tom
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE, 2024, 62 (06): : 952 - 970
  • [27] COMPARISON OF CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND VERSUS CONTRAST-ENHANCED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF FOCAL LIVER LESIONS USING THE LIVER IMAGING REPORTING AND DATA SYSTEM
    Wang, Jia-Yu
    Feng, Shao-Yang
    Yi, Ai-Jiao
    Zhu, Di
    Xu, Jian-Wei
    Li, Jun
    Cui, Xin-Wu
    Dietrich, Christoph F.
    ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2020, 46 (05): : 1216 - 1223
  • [28] Contrast-enhanced helical CT versus unenhanced MR imaging for evaluating focal hepatic lesions: Can contrast-enhanced CT be abandoned?
    Helmberger, TK
    Gauger, J
    Holzknecht, NG
    Reiser, MF
    RADIOLOGY, 1996, 201 : 87 - 87
  • [29] Diagnosis value of focal liver lesions with SonoVueA®-enhanced ultrasound compared with contrast-enhanced computed tomography and contrast-enhanced MRI: a meta-analysis
    Guang, Yang
    Xie, LiMei
    Ding, Hailong
    Cai, AiLu
    Huang, Ying
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 137 (11) : 1595 - 1605
  • [30] Characteristics of Focal Liver Lesions in Arterial Phase on Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound and Contrast-enhanced Computed Tomography - Comparative Study
    Wang, Xing-Hua
    Shi, Ying
    Zhang, Huan-Hu
    Ma, Xia
    ADVANCES IN CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2014, 23 (01): : 85 - 89