Early Catheter Removal After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Results from a Prospective Single-institutional Randomized Trial (Ripreca Study)

被引:16
|
作者
Lista, Giuliana [1 ]
Lughezzani, Giovanni [1 ]
Buffi, Nicolo Maria [1 ,2 ]
Saita, Alberto [1 ]
Vanni, Elena [3 ,4 ]
Hurle, Rodolfo [1 ]
Cardone, Pasquale [5 ]
Peschechera, Roberto [1 ]
Forni, Giovanni [2 ]
Lazzeri, Massimo [1 ]
Guazzoni, Giorgio [1 ,2 ]
Casale, Paolo [1 ]
机构
[1] Humanitas Clin & Res Hosp, Urol, Milan, Italy
[2] Humanitas Univ, Milan, Italy
[3] Humanitas Clin & Res Ctr, Business Operat Off, Milan, Italy
[4] Humanitas Univ, Dept Biomed Sci, Milan, Italy
[5] Casa Sollievo Sofferenza Hosp, IRCCS, Urol, San Giovanni Rotondo, FG, Italy
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS | 2020年 / 6卷 / 02期
关键词
R; obot assisted radical prostatectomy; Prostate cancer; Vesicouretrhal anastomosis; Posterior reconstruction; Urinary continence; Functional outcomes; URINARY CONTINENCE; EAU GUIDELINES; COMPLICATIONS; OUTCOMES; METAANALYSIS; ANASTOMOSIS; RECOVERY; CANCER; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.euf.2018.10.013
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The adoption of robotic technology in the treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) could lead to improvement in outcomes. Objective: To evaluate feasibility, to compare functional outcomes, and to assess the economic benefits of removing catheter on the postoperative day (POD) 3 versus POD 5 after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Design, setting, and participants: From September 2016 to May 2017, patients selected to undergo RARP for clinically localized PCa at a high-volume center were prospectively randomized into group 1 (POD 3; n = 72) versus group 2 (POD 5, n = 74). Intervention: All patients underwent RARP with anatomical posterior and anterior reconstruction. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The primary endpoint was to compare acute urinary retention (AUR) and urinary leakage rate in the two groups. The secondary endpoints were early and mid-term postoperative functional outcomes assessed through questionnaires (ICIQ-MLUTS, IPSS), early continence rate, and postoperative pain/discomfort (visual analog scale score). The economic impact of early catheter removal was also assessed. Results and limitations: AUR was reported in two (1.4%) cases, one for each study group (p = 0.9). One case of vesicourethral leakage was reported (0.7%) in group 1. Urethral discomfort and pain at discharge was significantly higher in group 2 (p = 0.03). In our clinical practice, POD 3 catheter removal approach would determine a saving of approximately (sic)80 000 and 405 d of hospitalization yearly. The main limitation is the small sample size. Conclusions: Early catheter removal after RARP does not lead to an increase in perioperative complications. No negative effect on early and mid-term functional outcomes was observed. A significant impact on saving economic resources was reported. Patient summary: We demonstrated that early catheter removal has no negative effect on spontaneous voiding, complications, or urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. (C) 2018 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 266
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Preliminary results of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) after fellowship training and experience in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP)
    Wolanski, Philippe
    Chabert, Charles
    Jones, Lee
    Mullavey, Tarryn
    Walsh, Sharon
    Gianduzzo, Troy
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 110 : 64 - 70
  • [32] Retzius-sparing versus standard robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective randomized comparison on immediate continence rates
    Asimakopoulos, Anastasios D.
    Topazio, Luca
    De Angelis, Michele
    Agro, Enrico Finazzi
    Pastore, Antonio Luigi
    Fuschi, Andrea
    Annino, Filippo
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 33 (07): : 2187 - 2196
  • [33] Robot-assisted single-port radical prostatectomy: A phase 1 clinical study
    Ng, Chi-Fai
    Teoh, Jeremy Yuen-Chun
    Chiu, Peter Ka-Fung
    Yee, Chi-Hang
    Chan, Chi-Kwok
    Hou, Simon See-Ming
    Kaouk, Jihad
    Chan, Eddie Shu-Yin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 26 (09) : 878 - 883
  • [34] Early Removal of Urethral Catheter with Suprapubic Tube Drainage Versus Urethral Catheter Drainage Alone after Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
    Prasad, Sandip M.
    Large, Michael C.
    Patel, Amit R.
    Famakinwa, Olufenwa
    Galocy, R. Matthew
    Karrison, Theodore
    Shalhav, Arieh L.
    Zagaja, Gregory P.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 192 (01) : 89 - 95
  • [35] Impact of peritoneal bladder flap in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy patients on lymphoceles: a prospective randomised trial
    Pose, Randi M.
    Knipper, S.
    Beyer, B.
    Hohenhorst, L.
    Haese, A.
    Heinzer, H.
    Salomon, G.
    Steuber, T.
    Budaeus, L.
    Tilki, D.
    Isbarn, H.
    Maurer, T.
    Tennstedt, P.
    Graefen, M.
    Michl, U.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2025, 43 (01)
  • [36] Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: functional and early oncologic results in aggressive and locally advanced prostate cancer
    Nyarangi-Dix, Joanne Nyaboe
    Goertz, Magdalena
    Gradinarov, Georgi
    Hofer, Luisa
    Schuetz, Viktoria
    Gasch, Claudia
    Radtke, Jan Philipp
    Hohenfellner, Markus
    BMC UROLOGY, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [37] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using the avatera system™: a prospective pilot study
    Gkeka, Kristiana
    Kallidonis, Panagiotis
    Peteinaris, Angelis
    Katsakiori, Paraskevi
    Tatanis, Vasileios
    Faitatziadis, Solon
    Spinos, Theodoros
    Vagionis, Athanasios
    Vrettos, Theofanis
    Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe
    Liatsikos, Evangelos
    MINERVA UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2024, 76 (01): : 52 - 59
  • [38] Early urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in older Australian men
    Basto, Marnique Y.
    Vidyasagar, Chinni
    te Marvelde, Luc
    Freeborn, Helen
    Birch, Emma
    Landau, Adam
    Murphy, Declan G.
    Moon, Daniel
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 114 : 29 - 33
  • [39] Ideal timing of indwelling catheter removal after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a running barbed suture technique: a prospective analysis of 425 consecutive patients
    Lenart, Sebastian
    Berger, Ingrid
    Boehler, Judith
    Boehm, Reinhard
    Gutjahr, Georg
    Hartig, Nikolaus
    Koller, Daniel
    Lamche, Michael
    Madersbacher, Stephan
    Stolzlechner, Michael
    Wayand, Claudia Elisa
    Ponholzer, Anton
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 38 (09) : 2177 - 2183
  • [40] Posterior Urethral Suspension During Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Improves Early Urinary Control: A Prospective Cohort Study
    Canvasser, Noah E.
    Lay, Aaron H.
    Koseoglu, Ersin
    Morgan, Monica S. C.
    Cadeddu, Jeffrey A.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2016, 30 (10) : 1089 - 1094