Early Catheter Removal After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Results from a Prospective Single-institutional Randomized Trial (Ripreca Study)

被引:16
|
作者
Lista, Giuliana [1 ]
Lughezzani, Giovanni [1 ]
Buffi, Nicolo Maria [1 ,2 ]
Saita, Alberto [1 ]
Vanni, Elena [3 ,4 ]
Hurle, Rodolfo [1 ]
Cardone, Pasquale [5 ]
Peschechera, Roberto [1 ]
Forni, Giovanni [2 ]
Lazzeri, Massimo [1 ]
Guazzoni, Giorgio [1 ,2 ]
Casale, Paolo [1 ]
机构
[1] Humanitas Clin & Res Hosp, Urol, Milan, Italy
[2] Humanitas Univ, Milan, Italy
[3] Humanitas Clin & Res Ctr, Business Operat Off, Milan, Italy
[4] Humanitas Univ, Dept Biomed Sci, Milan, Italy
[5] Casa Sollievo Sofferenza Hosp, IRCCS, Urol, San Giovanni Rotondo, FG, Italy
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS | 2020年 / 6卷 / 02期
关键词
R; obot assisted radical prostatectomy; Prostate cancer; Vesicouretrhal anastomosis; Posterior reconstruction; Urinary continence; Functional outcomes; URINARY CONTINENCE; EAU GUIDELINES; COMPLICATIONS; OUTCOMES; METAANALYSIS; ANASTOMOSIS; RECOVERY; CANCER; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.euf.2018.10.013
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The adoption of robotic technology in the treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) could lead to improvement in outcomes. Objective: To evaluate feasibility, to compare functional outcomes, and to assess the economic benefits of removing catheter on the postoperative day (POD) 3 versus POD 5 after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Design, setting, and participants: From September 2016 to May 2017, patients selected to undergo RARP for clinically localized PCa at a high-volume center were prospectively randomized into group 1 (POD 3; n = 72) versus group 2 (POD 5, n = 74). Intervention: All patients underwent RARP with anatomical posterior and anterior reconstruction. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The primary endpoint was to compare acute urinary retention (AUR) and urinary leakage rate in the two groups. The secondary endpoints were early and mid-term postoperative functional outcomes assessed through questionnaires (ICIQ-MLUTS, IPSS), early continence rate, and postoperative pain/discomfort (visual analog scale score). The economic impact of early catheter removal was also assessed. Results and limitations: AUR was reported in two (1.4%) cases, one for each study group (p = 0.9). One case of vesicourethral leakage was reported (0.7%) in group 1. Urethral discomfort and pain at discharge was significantly higher in group 2 (p = 0.03). In our clinical practice, POD 3 catheter removal approach would determine a saving of approximately (sic)80 000 and 405 d of hospitalization yearly. The main limitation is the small sample size. Conclusions: Early catheter removal after RARP does not lead to an increase in perioperative complications. No negative effect on early and mid-term functional outcomes was observed. A significant impact on saving economic resources was reported. Patient summary: We demonstrated that early catheter removal has no negative effect on spontaneous voiding, complications, or urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. (C) 2018 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 266
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Short-term Results after Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Compared to Open Radical Prostatectomy
    Wallerstedt, Anna
    Tyritzis, Stavros I.
    Thorsteinsdottir, Thordis
    Carlsson, Stefan
    Stranne, Johan
    Gustafsson, Ove
    Hugosson, Jonas
    Bjartell, Anders
    Wilderaeng, Ulrica
    Wiklund, N. Peter
    Steineck, Gunnar
    Haglind, Eva
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 67 (04) : 660 - 670
  • [22] A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Impact of the Retzius-sparing Approach on Early Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Dalela, Deepansh
    Jeong, Wooju
    Prasad, Madhu-Ashni
    Sood, Akshay
    Abdollah, Firas
    Diaz, Mireya
    Karabon, Patrick
    Sammon, Jesse
    Jamil, Marcus
    Baize, Brad
    Simone, Andrea
    Menon, Mani
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2017, 72 (05) : 677 - 685
  • [23] Perioperative, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes Between Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy and Open Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Nahas, William Carlos
    Rodrigues, Gilberto Jose
    Goncalves, Fabio Augusto Rodrigues
    Sawczyn, Guilherme Vinicius
    Barros, Guilherme Garcia
    Cardili, Leonardo
    Guglielmetti, Giuliano Betoni
    Fazoli, Arnaldo Jose De Carvalho
    Cordeiro, Mauricio Dener
    Cassao, Valter Dell Acqua
    Chade, Daher Cesar
    De Oliveira, Luiz Carlos Neves
    Murta, Claudio Bovolenta
    Pontes Junior, Jose
    Trindade, Evelinda Marramon
    Bastos, Diogo Assed
    Sarkis, Alvaro Sadek
    Mitre, Anuar Ibrahim
    Trinh, Quoc-Dien
    Coelho, Rafael Ferreira
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 212 (01) : 32 - 40
  • [24] Predictors of Early Continence After Single-port Transvesical Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Ramos-Carpinteyro, Roxana
    Ferguson, Ethan
    Soputro, Nicolas
    Chavali, Jaya S.
    Abou Zeinab, Mahmoud
    Pedraza, Adriana
    Mikesell, Carter
    Kaouk, Jihad
    UROLOGY, 2024, 184 : 176 - 181
  • [25] Predictive factors of immediate continence after conventional robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a single-institution retrospective study
    Ozawa, Yu
    Koike, Shin
    Aoki, Keisuke
    Okamoto, Keita
    Ushijima, Kei
    Kayaba, Toshiaki
    Nohara, Sunao
    Yamada, Masumi
    Odagaki, Yu
    Sakamoto, Hideo
    Yoshioka, Kunihiko
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2025, 30 (01) : 134 - 143
  • [26] Impact of metabolic syndrome on early recovery of continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Nishikawa, Masatomo
    Watanabe, Hiromitsu
    Kurahashi, Toshifumi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 24 (09) : 692 - 697
  • [27] Predictive factors of hemoglobin drop after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a single center prospective study
    Polverino, Federico
    Di Bello, Francesco
    Morra, Simone
    Califano, Gianluigi
    Marzano, Bruno
    Fraia, Agostino
    Granata, Giuliano
    Aprea, Salvatore
    Miele, Francesco
    Creta, Massimiliano
    Logrieco, Nicola
    Buonanno, Pasquale
    Longo, Nicola
    Servillo, Giuseppe
    Imbimbo, Ciro
    Colla Ruvolo, Claudia
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2024, 18 (01)
  • [28] Learning curve for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a large prospective multicentre study
    Bock, David
    Nyberg, Martin
    Lantz, Anna
    Carlsson, Sigrid, V
    Sjoberg, Daniel D.
    Carlsson, Stefan
    Stranne, Johan
    Steineck, Gunnar
    Wiklund, Peter
    Haglind, Eva
    Bjartell, Anders
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 56 (03) : 182 - 190
  • [29] Feasibility, safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a new robotic surgical system: a prospective, controlled, randomized clinical trial
    Dong, Jie
    Ji, Ruoyu
    Cui, Liang
    Liu, Guanghua
    Xie, Yi
    Zhou, Jingmin
    Wang, Huizhen
    Xu, Weifeng
    Ji, Zhigang
    BMC CANCER, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [30] Correlation between extended pelvic lymph node dissection and urinary incontinence at early phase after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Lee, Ken
    Shiota, Masaki
    Takamatsu, Dai
    Ushijima, Miho
    Blas, Leandro
    Okabe, Ayami
    Kajioka, Shunichi
    Goto, Shunsuke
    Kinoshita, Fumio
    Matsumoto, Takashi
    Monji, Keisuke
    Kashiwagi, Eiji
    Inokuchi, Junichi
    Oda, Yoshinao
    Eto, Masatoshi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 30 (04) : 340 - 346