Early Catheter Removal After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Results from a Prospective Single-institutional Randomized Trial (Ripreca Study)

被引:16
|
作者
Lista, Giuliana [1 ]
Lughezzani, Giovanni [1 ]
Buffi, Nicolo Maria [1 ,2 ]
Saita, Alberto [1 ]
Vanni, Elena [3 ,4 ]
Hurle, Rodolfo [1 ]
Cardone, Pasquale [5 ]
Peschechera, Roberto [1 ]
Forni, Giovanni [2 ]
Lazzeri, Massimo [1 ]
Guazzoni, Giorgio [1 ,2 ]
Casale, Paolo [1 ]
机构
[1] Humanitas Clin & Res Hosp, Urol, Milan, Italy
[2] Humanitas Univ, Milan, Italy
[3] Humanitas Clin & Res Ctr, Business Operat Off, Milan, Italy
[4] Humanitas Univ, Dept Biomed Sci, Milan, Italy
[5] Casa Sollievo Sofferenza Hosp, IRCCS, Urol, San Giovanni Rotondo, FG, Italy
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS | 2020年 / 6卷 / 02期
关键词
R; obot assisted radical prostatectomy; Prostate cancer; Vesicouretrhal anastomosis; Posterior reconstruction; Urinary continence; Functional outcomes; URINARY CONTINENCE; EAU GUIDELINES; COMPLICATIONS; OUTCOMES; METAANALYSIS; ANASTOMOSIS; RECOVERY; CANCER; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.euf.2018.10.013
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The adoption of robotic technology in the treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) could lead to improvement in outcomes. Objective: To evaluate feasibility, to compare functional outcomes, and to assess the economic benefits of removing catheter on the postoperative day (POD) 3 versus POD 5 after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Design, setting, and participants: From September 2016 to May 2017, patients selected to undergo RARP for clinically localized PCa at a high-volume center were prospectively randomized into group 1 (POD 3; n = 72) versus group 2 (POD 5, n = 74). Intervention: All patients underwent RARP with anatomical posterior and anterior reconstruction. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The primary endpoint was to compare acute urinary retention (AUR) and urinary leakage rate in the two groups. The secondary endpoints were early and mid-term postoperative functional outcomes assessed through questionnaires (ICIQ-MLUTS, IPSS), early continence rate, and postoperative pain/discomfort (visual analog scale score). The economic impact of early catheter removal was also assessed. Results and limitations: AUR was reported in two (1.4%) cases, one for each study group (p = 0.9). One case of vesicourethral leakage was reported (0.7%) in group 1. Urethral discomfort and pain at discharge was significantly higher in group 2 (p = 0.03). In our clinical practice, POD 3 catheter removal approach would determine a saving of approximately (sic)80 000 and 405 d of hospitalization yearly. The main limitation is the small sample size. Conclusions: Early catheter removal after RARP does not lead to an increase in perioperative complications. No negative effect on early and mid-term functional outcomes was observed. A significant impact on saving economic resources was reported. Patient summary: We demonstrated that early catheter removal has no negative effect on spontaneous voiding, complications, or urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. (C) 2018 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 266
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Early Catheter Removal after Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Surgical Technique and Outcomes for the Aalst Technique (ECaRemA Study)
    Gratzke, Christian
    Dovey, Zach
    Novara, Giacomo
    Geurts, Nicolas
    De Groote, Ruben
    Schatteman, Peter
    de Naeyer, Geert
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Mottrie, Alexandre
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (05) : 917 - 923
  • [2] Impact of tamsulosin on urinary retention following early catheter removal after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A prospective randomized controlled trial
    Jeong, In Gab
    You, Dalsan
    Yoon, Jong Hyun
    Hong, Sungwoo
    Lim, Ju Hyun
    Hong, Jun Hyuk
    Choo, Myung-Soo
    Ahn, Hanjong
    Kim, Choung-Soo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 21 (02) : 164 - 168
  • [3] Predictors of Early Continence after Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Yamada, Yuta
    Fujimura, Tetsuya
    Fukuhara, Hiroshi
    Sugihara, Toru
    Nakagawa, Tohru
    Kume, Haruki
    Igawa, Yasuhiko
    Homma, Yukio
    LUTS-LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS, 2018, 10 (03) : 287 - 291
  • [4] Superior early and long-term continence following early micturition on day 2 after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a randomized prospective trial
    Harke, Nina Natascha
    Wagner, Christian
    Liakos, Nikolaos
    Urbanova, Katarina
    Addali, Mustapha
    Hadaschik, Boris A.
    Witt, Jorn H.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 39 (03) : 771 - 777
  • [5] Novel Prevention Procedure for Inguinal Hernia after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Results from a Prospective Randomized Trial
    Kadono, Yoshifumi
    Nohara, Takahiro
    Kawaguchi, Shohei
    Sakamoto, Jiro
    Iwamoto, Hiroaki
    Yaegashi, Hiroshi
    Nakashima, Kazufumi
    Iijima, Masashi
    Shigehara, Kazuyoshi
    Izumi, Kouji
    Mizokami, Atsushi
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2019, 33 (04) : 302 - 308
  • [6] Self-removal of catheter after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a feasibility study
    Wissam Abou Chedid
    Danny Darlington Carbin
    Maria Innes
    Helen Casson
    Mark Broe
    Mohammad Hossain
    Gerasimos Frajkoulis
    Danielle Whiting
    Constantinos Adamou
    Murthy Kusuma
    Dimitrios Moschonas
    James Hicks
    Krishna Patil
    Christopher Eden
    Matthew James Alexander Perry
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2023, 17 : 2697 - 2701
  • [7] Evaluation of the functional results and safety of early removal of the urethral catheter after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Kotov, S., V
    Guspanov, R., I
    Byadretdinov, I. Sh
    Ryabov, M. A.
    Pulbere, S. A.
    Yusufov, A. G.
    Zhilov, M. S.
    ONKOUROLOGIYA, 2022, 18 (01): : 38 - 47
  • [8] Self-removal of catheter after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a feasibility study
    Chedid, Wissam Abou
    Carbin, Danny Darlington
    Innes, Maria
    Casson, Helen
    Broe, Mark
    Hossain, Mohammad
    Frajkoulis, Gerasimos
    Whiting, Danielle
    Adamou, Constantinos
    Kusuma, Murthy
    Moschonas, Dimitrios
    Hicks, James
    Patil, Krishna
    Eden, Christopher
    Perry, Matthew James Alexander
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2023, 17 (06) : 2697 - 2701
  • [9] Impact of Early Dorsal Venous Complex Ligation on Urinary Continence Recovery after Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Results from a Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial
    Bravi, Carlo A.
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Mazzone, Elio
    Fossati, Nicola
    Gallina, Andrea
    Stabile, Armando
    Scuderi, Simone
    Barletta, Francesco
    Nocera, Luigi
    Rosiello, Giuseppe
    Martini, Alberto
    Pellegrino, Francesco
    Cucchiara, Vito
    Deho, Federico
    Capitanio, Umberto
    Scattoni, Vincenzo
    Salonia, Andrea
    Briganti, Alberto
    Montorsi, Francesco
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2023, 9 (01): : 83 - 88
  • [10] Effect of Peritoneal Fixation (PerFix) on Lymphocele Formation in Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy with Pelvic Lymphadenectomy: Results of a Randomized Prospective Trial
    Student Jr, Vladimir
    Tudos, Zbynek
    Studentova, Zuzana
    Cesak, Ondrej
    Studentova, Hana
    Repa, Vaclav
    Purova, Dana
    Student, Vladimir
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2023, 83 (02) : 154 - 162