Predicting physical distancing over time during COVID-19: testing an integrated model

被引:19
作者
Hagger, Martin S. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Smith, Stephanie R. [4 ]
Keech, Jacob J. [4 ,5 ]
Moyers, Susette A. [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Hamilton, Kyra [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Merced, Dept Psychol Sci, Social & Hlth Psychol Behav Res Prevent & Promot, 5200 N Lake Rd, Merced, CA 95343 USA
[2] Univ Calif Merced, Hlth Sci Res Inst, 5200 N Lake Rd, Merced, CA USA
[3] Univ Jyvaskyla, Fac Sport & Hlth Sci, Jyvaskyla, Finland
[4] Griffith Univ, Menzies Hlth Inst Queensland, Sch Appl Psychol, Hlth & Psychol Innovat HaPI Res Lab, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[5] Univ Sunshine Coast, Sch Hlth & Behav Sci, Sippy Downs, Qld, Australia
[6] Oklahoma State Univ, Natl Ctr Wellness & Recovery, Ctr Hlth Sci, Tulsa, OK USA
关键词
Social cognition theory; habit; integrated models; social distancing; behavior change; SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; PAST BEHAVIOR; PLANNED BEHAVIOR; FEAR APPEALS; DUAL-PROCESS; HABIT; INTENTIONS; PSYCHOLOGY; CONSTRUCT;
D O I
10.1080/08870446.2021.1968397
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: We applied an integrated social cognition model to predict physical distancing behavior, a key COVID-19 preventive behavior, over a four-month period. Design: A three-wave longitudinal survey design. Methods: Australian and US residents (N = 601) completed self-report measures of social cognition constructs (attitude, subjective norm, moral norm, perceived behavioral control [PBC]), intention, habit, and physical distancing behavior on an initial occasion (T1) and on two further occasions one week (T2) and four months (T3) later. Results: A structural equation model revealed that subjective norm, moral norm, and PBC, were consistent predictors of physical distancing intention on all three occasions. Intention and habit at T1 and T2 predicted physical distancing behavior at T2 and T3, respectively. Intention at T2 mediated effects of subjective norm, moral norm, and PBC at T2 on physical distancing behavior at T3, and habit at T1 and T2 mediated effects of behavior at T1 and T2 on follow-up behavior at T2 and T3, respectively. Conclusion: Normative (subjective and moral norms) and capacity (PBC) constructs were consistent predictors of physical distancing intention, and intention and habit were consistent predictors of physical distancing behavior. Interventions promoting physical distancing should target change in normative and personal capacity beliefs, and habit. Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2021.1968397 .
引用
收藏
页码:1436 / 1456
页数:21
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]   Acting on intentions: The role of anticipated regret [J].
Abraham, C ;
Sheeran, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 42 :495-511
[2]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[3]  
Ajzen I., 2006, Constructing a TPB questionnaire: conceptual and methodological considerations
[4]  
Ajzen I., 1985, UNDERSTANDING ATTITU, P11
[5]   A longitudinal investigation of older adults' physical activity: Testing an integrated dual-process model [J].
Arnautovska, Urska ;
Fleig, Lena ;
O'Callaghan, Frances ;
Hamilton, Kyra .
PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2017, 32 (02) :166-185
[6]  
Bagozzi R.P., 1992, HUM RELAT, V45, P660
[7]   Adherence to the Physical Distancing Measures during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A HAPA-Based Perspective [J].
Beeckman, Melanie ;
De Paepe, Annick ;
Van Alboom, Maite ;
Maes, Sarah ;
Wauters, Aline ;
Baert, Fleur ;
Kissi, Ama ;
Veirman, Elke ;
Poppe, Louise ;
Van Ryckeghem, Dimitri M. L. .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-HEALTH AND WELL BEING, 2020, 12 (04) :1224-1243
[9]   Demographic, Personality, and Social Cognition Correlates of Coronavirus Guideline Adherence in a US Sample [J].
Bogg, Tim ;
Milad, Elizabeth .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 39 (12) :1026-1036
[10]   Moral Suasion and the Private Provision of Public Goods: Evidence from the COVID-19 Pandemic [J].
Bos, Bjoern ;
Drupp, Moritz A. ;
Meya, Jasper N. ;
Quaas, Martin F. .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2020, 76 (04) :1117-1138