Effects of modified constraint-induced movement therapy on movement kinematics and daily function in patients with stroke: A kinematic study of motor control mechanisms

被引:78
作者
Wu, Ching-Yi
Lin, Keh-chung
Chen, Hsieh-ching
Chen, I-hsuen
Hong, Wei-hsien
机构
[1] Chang Gung Univ, Dept Occupat Therapy, Tao Yuan 333, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Univ, Grad Inst Clin Behav Sci, Tao Yuan 333, Taiwan
[3] Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Med, Sch Occupat Therapy, Taipei 10764, Taiwan
[4] Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Taipei, Taiwan
[5] Chaoyang Univ Technol, Dept Ind Engn & Management, Taichung, Taiwan
[6] Songshan Armed Forces Gen Hosp, Div Phys Rehabil, Taipei, Taiwan
[7] China Med Univ, Sch Sports Med, Taichung, Taiwan
关键词
cerebrovascular disease; upper extremity Kinematics; rehabilitation; activities of daily living;
D O I
10.1177/1545968307303411
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Objective. Motor control of the upper extremity during unilateral and bimanual functional tasks and functional change during daily activities were evaluated in patients with stroke treated with modified constraint-induced movement therapy (mCIMT). Methods. In a pre-post randomized, controlled trial, 30 stroke patients received 2 hours of mCIMT or traditional rehabilitation (TR) for 3 weeks. Motor control of the upper extremity was evaluated using kinematic analysis in unilateral and bilateral tasks. Kinematic variables included spatial and temporal movement efficiency and type of movement control (preplanned control, representing well-learned movement, or feedback-guided control). Functional outcomes were evaluated using the Motor Activity Log (MAL) and the Functional Independence Measure (FIM). Results. Patients receiving mCIMT showed more temporally (P =.013) and spatially (P =.0 11) efficient movement and more preplanned movement control (P =.009) during the bimanual task, and greater gains in FIM (P =.004) and MAL scores (amount of use: P <.0001, and quality of movement: P =.012) than patients in the TR group. Patients receiving mCIMT produced more ballistic/preplanned reaching movement than did patients receiving TR (P=.023) during the unilateral task; but there were no group differences in temporal or spatial efficiency in unilateral task performance. Conclusions. Relative to TR, mCIMT produced a greater improvement in functional performance and motor control. Improvement of motor control after mCIMT was based on improved spatial and temporal efficiency, apparently more salient during bimanual rather than unilateral task performance. This suggests that bilateral task performance should potentially be emphasized in kinematic study of changes in motor control after mCIMT.
引用
收藏
页码:460 / 466
页数:7
相关论文
共 35 条