Marxism after postmodernism: Rethinking the emancipatory political subject

被引:0
作者
Filc, D. [1 ]
Ram, U. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, IL-84105 Beer Sheva, Israel
来源
SOTSIOLOGICHESKIE ISSLEDOVANIYA | 2015年 / 05期
关键词
Marxism; post-Marxists; postmodernism; class; subject;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
The concept of a historical-social and political emancipatory subject, central in Marxism, has been rebuked by postmodern theories. Authors examine the encounter between Marxist and postmodernist theories pondering how to conceive of an emancipatory-political subject. The article outlines a typology of the different responses of Marxist thinkers to the postmodernist challenge. The authors distinguish between 'total rejection' (anti-postmodern Marxism) and 'total acceptance' (postMarxism), and between 'rejection in part' (Marxist postmodernism) and 'acceptance in-part' (synthetic Marxist postmodernism). Based on this typology, the authors discuss the different approaches to the question of the emancipatory subject.
引用
收藏
页码:22 / +
页数:12
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Amin A., 1994, POSTFORDISM READER
[2]  
Aronowitz S., 2004, CLASS WORKS POWER SO
[3]  
Aronson Ronald., 1995, After Marxism
[4]  
Balibar Etienne., 1994, MASSES CLASSES IDEAS
[5]  
Boron A., 2000, LATIN AM PERSPECTIVE
[6]  
Bourdieu P., 1991, Language and Symbolic Power
[7]   Is a finance-led growth regime a viable alternative to Fordism? A preliminary analysis [J].
Boyer, R .
ECONOMY AND SOCIETY, 2000, 29 (01) :111-145
[8]  
Chibber V, 2003, LOCKED IN PLACE: STATE-BUILDING AND LATE INDUSTRIALIZATION IN INDIA, P1
[9]  
Chibber Vivek., 2013, POSTCOLONIAL THEORY
[10]  
Dussel E., PRAXIS LATINOAMERICA, P11983