Mine water treatment with limestone for sulfate removal

被引:119
|
作者
Silva, Adarlene M. [1 ]
Lima, Rosa M. F. [1 ]
Leao, Versiane A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Ouro Preto, Dept Met & Mat Engn, Bio&Hydromet Lab, BR-35400000 Ouro Preto, MG, Brazil
关键词
Sulfate; Mine water; Limestone; Sorption; Fixed-bed models; Thomas model; BED; SORPTION; METALS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.03.066
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Limestone can be an option for sulfate sorption, particularly from neutral mine drainages because calcium ions on the solid surface can bind sulfate ions. This work investigated sulfate removal from mine waters through sorption on limestone. Continuous stirred-tank experiments reduced the sulfate concentration from 588.0 mg/L to 87.0 mg/L at a 210-min residence time. Batch equilibrium tests showed that sulfate loading on limestone can be described by the Langmuir isotherm, with a maximum loading of 23.7 mg/g. Fixed-bed experiments were utilized to produce breakthrough curves at different bed depths. The Bed Depth Service Time (BDST) model was applied, and it indicated sulfate loadings of up to 20.0 g SO42-/L-bed as the flow rate increased from 1 to 10 mL/min. Thomas, Yoon-Nelson and dose-response models, predicted a maximum particle loading of 19 mg/g. Infrared spectrometry indicated the presence of sulfate ions on the limestone surface. Sulfate sorption on limestone seems to be an alternative to treating mine waters with sulfate concentrations below the 1200-2000 mg/L range, where lime precipitation is not effective. In addition, this approach does not require alkaline pH values, as in the ettringite process. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 55
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Removal of Arsenic and Iron from Acidic Water Using Zeolite and Limestone: Batch and Column Studies
    K. Lizama-Allende
    D. Henry-Pinilla
    D. E. Diaz-Droguett
    Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 2017, 228
  • [22] Removal of Arsenic and Iron from Acidic Water Using Zeolite and Limestone: Batch and Column Studies
    Lizama-Allende, K.
    Henry-Pinilla, D.
    Diaz-Droguett, D. E.
    WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2017, 228 (08):
  • [23] The effectiveness of in situ limestone treatment of acid mine drainage
    Cox, MR
    ENVIRONMENTAL & ENGINEERING GEOSCIENCE, 1998, 4 (01): : 3 - 14
  • [24] Removal of Heavy Metal Ions by Ferrihydrite: an Opportunity to the Treatment of Acid Mine Drainage
    Karapinar, Nuray
    WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2016, 227 (06):
  • [25] Removal of lead from water samples by sorption onto powdered limestone
    Ghazy, S. E.
    Ragab, A. H.
    SEPARATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 42 (03) : 653 - 667
  • [26] Geochemical thermodynamics of cadmium removal from water with limestone
    Davis, Arden D.
    Webb, Cathleen J.
    Sorensen, Jenifer L.
    Dixon, David J.
    Hudson, Roberta
    ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2018, 77 (02)
  • [27] Treatment of neutral gold mine drainage by sequential in situ hydrotalcite precipitation, and microbial sulfate and cyanide removal
    Cheng, Ka Yu
    Acuna, Caroline Rubina
    Kaksonen, Anna H.
    Esslemont, Graeme
    Douglas, Grant B.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 801
  • [28] Geochemical Thermodynamics of Lead Removal from Water with Limestone
    Davis, Arden D.
    Webb, Cathleen J.
    Sorensen, Jenifer L.
    Dixon, David J.
    Hudson, Roberta
    WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2018, 229 (06):
  • [29] Fluoride removal from water using crushed limestone
    Nath, Suresh K.
    Dutta, Robin K.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 17 (02) : 120 - 125
  • [30] Geochemical Thermodynamics of Lead Removal from Water with Limestone
    Arden D. Davis
    Cathleen J. Webb
    Jenifer L. Sorensen
    David J. Dixon
    Roberta Hudson
    Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 2018, 229