A metric for the real-time evaluation of the aircraft boarding progress

被引:37
作者
Schultz, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] German Aerosp Ctr, Inst Flight Guidance, Braunschweig, Germany
关键词
Aircraft ground trajectory; Passenger boarding; Real-time boarding status; Evaluation metric; AIRPLANE; PASSENGERS; PERFORMANCE; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.trc.2017.11.002
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
Future 4D aircraft trajectories demand the comprehensive consideration of environmental, economic, and operational constraints. A reliable prediction of all aircraft-related processes along the specific trajectories is essential for punctual operations. The uncertainties in the airborne phase only have minor impacts on the punctuality of a flight. The necessary change to an air-to-air perspective, with a specific focus on the ground operations, will provide key elements for complying with the challenging future requirements of a comprehensive 4D aircraft trajectory over the day of operations. A major task of the ground operations is to ensure a reliable and predictable departure time, which is an operational milestone for both the current and the destination airport. These mutual interdependencies between airports result in system-wide, far-reaching effects (reactionary delays). The ground trajectory of an aircraft primarily consists of the handling processes at the stand (deboarding, catering, fueling, cleaning, boarding, unloading, and loading), which are defined as the aircraft turnaround. To provide a reliable prediction of the turnaround, the critical path of processes has to be managed in a sustainable manner. The turnaround processes are mainly controlled by the ground handling, airport or airline staff, except the aircraft boarding, which is driven by the passengers' experience and willingness or ability to follow the proposed procedures. Addressing the fact that boarding is on the critical path of the aircraft 4D trajectory and not controlled by the operators, this paper provides a scientific approach for a real-time evaluation of the boarding progress using the capabilities of a future connected cabin (e.g. sensor environment). A calibrated microscopic approach is used to model the distinct passenger behavior, where the individual movement is defined as a one-dimensional, stochastic, and time/space discrete transition process. The simulation environment is capable of covering a broad range of behaviors, boarding strategies and operational constraints and allows the integration of infra structural changes and future technologies. The paper provides a set of indicators for depicting the real-time status of the boarding progress as a fundamental basis for the prediction of the boarding time. In this context, the aircraft seats are used as a sensor network with the capability to detect the seat status: free or occupied. The seat status is the basis for the calculation of an aircraft-wide interference potential as the major indicator for the boarding time. In combination with an integrated airline/airport information management (e.g. sequence of boarding passengers), the boarding progress will be transformed from a black box to a transparent progress with the operator's real-time ability to react to significant deviations from the planned progress. Thus, the research results provide a fundamental contribution towards the derivation of the crucial aircraft departure time.
引用
收藏
页码:467 / 487
页数:21
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Airbus, 2017, AIRB A320 AIRCR CHAR
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, 9965 ICAO
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, European ATM Master Plan
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, 9854AN458 ICAO
[5]   Bounds on the performance of back-to-front airplane boarding policies [J].
Bachmat, Eitan ;
Elkin, Michael .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH LETTERS, 2008, 36 (05) :597-601
[6]   Optimal back-to-front airplane boarding [J].
Bachmat, Eitan ;
Khachaturov, Vassilii ;
Kuperman, Ran .
PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2013, 87 (06)
[7]   Analysis of Airplane Boarding Times [J].
Bachmat, Eitan ;
Berend, Daniel ;
Sapir, Luba ;
Skiena, Steven ;
Stolyarov, Natan .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2009, 57 (02) :499-513
[8]   A linear programming approach for aircraft boarding strategy [J].
Bazargan, Massoud .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2007, 183 (01) :394-411
[9]   Comment on "Time needed to board an airplane: A power law and the structure behind it" [J].
Bernstein, Noam .
PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2012, 86 (02)
[10]  
Bronsvoort J., 2009, P 13 ATRS WORLD C AB