The test taker's fallacy: How students guess answers on multiple-choice tests

被引:6
|
作者
Lee, Chan Jean [1 ]
机构
[1] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol, Coll Business, Mkt, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
belief in randomness; heuristic; likelihood; representativeness; sequential judgment; GAMBLERS FALLACY; HOT HAND; RANDOMNESS; SEQUENCES; JUDGMENT; PATTERN; BIAS;
D O I
10.1002/bdm.2101
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Many students and applicants take multiple-choice tests to demonstrate their competence and achievement. When they are unsure, they guess the most likely answer to maximize their score. Despite the impact of guessing on test reliability and individual performance, studies have not examined how patterns of answer sequences in multiple-choice tests affect guessing. This research presents the test taker's fallacy, which refers to an individual's tendency to expect a different answer to appear for the next question given a run of the same answer choices. The test taker's fallacy exhibits negative recency, similar to the gambler's fallacy. However, extending the sequential judgment literature, the test taker's fallacy shows that negative recency arises even when sequences may or may not be randomly generated. In three studies, including a survey and experiments, the test taker's fallacy is robustly observed. The test taker's fallacy is consistent with the operation of the representativeness heuristic. This research explains what and how test takers guess given a streak of answers and extends judgment under uncertainty to the test-taking context.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 151
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] MOODLE AND MULTIPLE-CHOICE TESTS
    Babo, Lurdes
    Azevedo, Jose
    Torres, Cristina
    Lopes, Ana Paula
    4TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE (INTED 2010), 2010, : 296 - 303
  • [22] A DEFENSE OF MULTIPLE-CHOICE TESTS
    SCOTT, BL
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 1985, 53 (11) : 1035 - 1035
  • [23] A statistical test for detecting answer copying on multiple-choice tests
    van der Linden, WJ
    Sotaridona, L
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT, 2004, 41 (04) : 361 - 377
  • [24] MULTIPLE-CHOICE INTELLIGIBILITY TESTS
    BLACK, JW
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING DISORDERS, 1957, 22 (02): : 213 - 235
  • [25] ON OVERCONFIDENCE IN MULTIPLE-CHOICE TESTS
    HUTCHINSON, TP
    PSYCHOLOGICAL RECORD, 1994, 44 (02): : 253 - 255
  • [26] GUESSING ON MULTIPLE-CHOICE TESTS
    GRAESSER, RF
    EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1958, 18 (03) : 617 - 620
  • [27] STUDENTS-ATTITUDES TOWARD AND USE OF WRITTEN JUSTIFICATIONS FOR MULTIPLE-CHOICE ANSWERS
    GORRELL, J
    CRAMOND, B
    EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1988, 48 (04) : 935 - 943
  • [28] SET OF CRITERIA FOR EFFICIENCY OF THE PROCESS FORMING THE ANSWERS TO MULTIPLE-CHOICE TEST ITEMS
    Rybanov, Alexander Aleksandrovich
    TURKISH ONLINE JOURNAL OF DISTANCE EDUCATION, 2013, 14 (01): : 75 - 84
  • [29] EFFECT OF CONFIDENCE LEVEL IN MULTIPLE-CHOICE TEST ANSWERS ON RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF SCORES
    ABUSAYF, FK
    DIAMOND, JJ
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 1976, 70 (02): : 62 - 63
  • [30] FURTHER SUPPORT FOR CHANGING MULTIPLE-CHOICE ANSWERS
    FABREY, LJ
    CASE, SM
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, 1985, 60 (06): : 488 - 490