Comparative analysis of technical efficiency of piglet farming in three production center provinces in Indonesia

被引:0
作者
Harianto, H. [1 ]
Keraru, E. N. [2 ]
机构
[1] IPB Univ, Fac Econ & Management, Dept Agribusiness, Dramaga, Indonesia
[2] Univ Katolik Indonesia St Paulus Ruteng, Fac Agr & Anim Sci, Dept Socioecon Agr, Jakarta, Indonesia
关键词
Bali; Household survey; Stochastic production frontier; Vaccination; CHINA; INEFFICIENCY; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.14710/jitaa.47.3.192-203
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Pork production occupies the third position in Indonesia, after chicken and beef. Even pigs occupy the top rank in contributing to Indonesia's live animal exports. The purpose of this study was to com-pare the level of technical efficiency of smallholder piglet production farming in three centers of pig production areas, namely North Sumatra, Bali, and East Nusa Tenggara (NTT). The research data was sourced from secondary data at the farm level, collected by the Central Statistics Agency of Indonesia, through the Livestock Business Household Survey. This research utilized the stochastic production frontier model to assess the production efficiency and the one-step maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) method to measure the level of technical efficiency and the significance of the factors. The re-sults show that the average level of technical efficiency of piglet production farms in Indonesia is rela-tively low. Piglet production farms in Bali have the highest efficiency level and NTT is the lowest of the three provinces being compared. The number of pigs, feed expenditure, capital, and vaccinations are important factors in influencing production and the level of technical efficiency. Public policies that can increase farmers' access to production factors and better pig farm vaccine management become a necessity.
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 203
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Adetunji M. O., 2012, American Journal of Experimental Agriculture, V2, P382
  • [2] Technical efficiency measures for dairy farms using panel data: A comparison of alternative model specifications
    Ahmad, M
    BravoUreta, BE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 1996, 7 (04) : 399 - 415
  • [3] Aigner D. J., 1977, Journal of Economics, V6, P21, DOI DOI 10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5
  • [4] Aminu F. O., 2017, Agricultura Tropica et Subtropica, V50, P27
  • [5] Asmare B., 2014, ADV AGR, V2014, DOI [10.1155/2014/329254, DOI 10.1155/2014/329254]
  • [6] Battese G.E., 1995, EMPIR ECON, V20, P325, DOI [10.1007/bf01205442, DOI 10.1007/BF01205442]
  • [7] Stochastic frontier analysis using Stata
    Belotti, Federico
    Daidone, Silvio
    Ilardi, Giuseppe
    Ate, Vincenzo
    [J]. STATA JOURNAL, 2013, 13 (04) : 719 - 758
  • [8] BPS (Statistics Indonesia), 2020, STAT PROD DAG BAB ME
  • [9] Budaarsa K, 2014, P SEMINAR NASIONAL T, P1
  • [10] Identification of factors which influence the technical inefficiency of Indian farmers
    Coelli, T
    Battese, G
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1996, 40 (02): : 103 - 128