Follow-up care for childhood cancer survivors: A focus group analysis

被引:49
作者
Earle, EA
Davies, H
Greenfield, D
Ross, R
Eiser, C [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Dept Psychol, Child & Family Res Grp, Sheffield S10 2TP, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Sheffield Childrens Hosp, Sheffield S10 2TH, S Yorkshire, England
[3] Acad Unit Clin Oncol, Sheffield S10 2SJ, S Yorkshire, England
[4] Univ Sheffield, No Gen Hosp, Ctr Clin Sci, Sheffield S5 7AU, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
childhood cancer; survivors; focus groups; interpretative phenomenological analysis; models of care;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejca.2005.08.028
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Follow-up of survivors of childhood cancer is recommended to improve detection of late-effects, and provide individuals with information and advice. This study aimed to follow-up survivors of childhood cancer and report on their attitudes to current follow-up methods. Twenty-six survivors (13-25 years) of childhood cancer and their parent(s) attended focus groups (n = 7) to discuss views about follow-up care. Transcripts were analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA). Three themes were identified: strategies to achieve a normal life (through playing down possibility of late-effects or careful monitoring of health); expectations about follow-up (facts and information, advice about self-care, everyday living, and psychosocial consequences) and preferences for different models of care. Given that some families had reservations about the benefits of follow-up, it is important that services address survivors' interests and meet their expectations. Changes to service delivery must take account of individual needs and expectations. Possible limitations of focus group methods (recruitment, bias reduction, methods of analysis and influence of other participants' views) are discussed. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2882 / 2886
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Arceci Robert, 2002, CA Cancer J Clin, V52, P377
[2]   Recent advances in management of acute leukaemia [J].
Chessells, JM .
ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 2000, 82 (06) :438-442
[3]   What about focus group interaction data? [J].
Duggleby, W .
QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2005, 15 (06) :832-840
[4]   Clinic audit for long term survivors of childhood cancer [J].
Eiser, C ;
Levitt, G ;
Leiper, A ;
Havermans, T ;
Donovan, C .
ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 1996, 75 (05) :405-409
[5]  
Eshelman Debra, 2004, J Pediatr Oncol Nurs, V21, P271, DOI 10.1177/1043454204268875
[6]  
GRIFFITHS A, CURE BOOKLET
[7]   Childhood cancer survivors' knowledge about their past diagnosis and treatment - Childhood cancer survivor study [J].
Kadan-Lottick, NS ;
Robison, LL ;
Gurney, JG ;
Neglia, JP ;
Yasui, Y ;
Hayashi, R ;
Hudson, M ;
Greenberg, M ;
Mertens, AC .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 287 (14) :1832-1839
[8]   Getting the focus and the group: Enhancing analytical rigor in focus group research [J].
Kidd, PS ;
Parshall, MB .
QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2000, 10 (03) :293-308
[9]   QUALITATIVE RESEARCH - INTRODUCING FOCUS GROUPS [J].
KITZINGER, J .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 311 (7000) :299-302
[10]   Maximizing results with focus groups:: Moderator and analysis issues [J].
Morrison-Beedy, D ;
Côté-Arsenault, D ;
Feinstein, NF .
APPLIED NURSING RESEARCH, 2001, 14 (01) :48-53