Integrating discrete choice models and agent-based models for ex-ante evaluation of stakeholder policy acceptability in urban freight transport

被引：66

作者：

Le Pira, Michela ^{[1
]}

Marcucci, Edoardo ^{[2
,3
]}

Gatta, Valerio ^{[2
]}

Inturri, Giuseppe ^{[1
]}

Ignaccolo, Matteo ^{[1
]}

Pluchino, Alessandro ^{[4
,5
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Catania, Dept Civil Engn & Architecture DICAR, Catania, Italy

[2] Univ Roma Tre, Dept Polit Sci, Rome, Italy

[3] Molde Univ Coll, Dept Logist, Molde, Norway

[4] Univ Catania, Dept Phys & Astron DFA, Catania, Italy

[5] INFN Catania, Catania, Italy

来源：

RESEARCH IN TRANSPORTATION ECONOMICS | 2017年 / 64卷

关键词：

Stated preference; Agent-based simulation; Stakeholder acceptance; Stakeholder behavioural analysis; Participatory urban freight transport planning; NETWORKS; DESIGN; CITY; HETEROGENEITY; PREFERENCES; PARKING;

D O I：

10.1016/j.retrec.2017.08.002

中图分类号：

F [经济];

学科分类号：

02 ;

摘要：

This paper discusses the potential benefits of combining discrete choice models (DCMs) and agent-based models (ABMs) to provide a stakeholder behavioural analysis and support stakeholder engagement in urban freight transport (UFT) planning. The integrated modelling framework allows to evaluate stakeholders' policy acceptability taking into account their heterogeneous preferences and their interactive behaviour. The stakeholder behavioural analysis proposed, together with technical and economic analyses, contributes to the ex-ante policy assessment needed to support policy-makers in taking well thought-out decisions. An application of the modelling framework is here presented with the aim to prove its feasibility and added value for UFT policy-making, since it provides a ranking of policies that are likely to be accepted by stakeholders and that satisfy their heterogeneous desires and objectives while accounting for interaction effects. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：13 / 25

页数：13

共 79 条

[31] A new look at planning and designing transportation systems: A decision-making model based on cognitive rationality, stakeholder engagement and quantitative methods
Cascetta, Ennio
Carteni, Armando
Pagliara, Francesca
Montanino, Marcello
[J]. TRANSPORT POLICY, 2015, 38 : 27 - 39
[32] Statistical physics of social dynamics
Castellano, Claudio
Fortunato, Santo
Loreto, Vittorio
[J]. REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, 2009, 81 (02) : 591 - 646
[33] Dablanc L., 2011, EUR TRANSP RES REV, V3, P47, DOI [10.1007/s12544-011-0049-2, DOI 10.1007/S12544-011-0049-2]
[34] Receivers' response to new urban freight policies
Dominguez, Alberto
Holguin-Veras, Jose
Ibeas, Angel
dell'Olio, Luigi
[J]. PROCEEDINGS OF EWGT 2012 - 15TH MEETING OF THE EURO WORKING GROUP ON TRANSPORTATION, 2012, 54 : 886 - 896
[35] Flynn T, 2014, WINT SIMUL C PROC, P1700, DOI 10.1109/WSC.2014.7020020
[36] Minority opinion spreading in random geometry
Galam, S
[J]. EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL B, 2002, 25 (04) : 403 - 406
[37] Smart urban freight planning process: integrating desk, living lab and modelling approaches in decision-making
Gatta, Valerio
Marcucci, Edoardo
Le Pira, Michela
[J]. EUROPEAN TRANSPORT RESEARCH REVIEW, 2017, 9 (03)
[38] Urban freight transport and policy changes: Improving decision makers' awareness via an agent-specific approach
Gatta, Valerio
Marcucci, Edoardo
[J]. TRANSPORT POLICY, 2014, 36 : 248 - 252
[39] Addressing transport policy challenges through Policy-Packaging
Givoni, Moshe
[J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2014, 60 : 1 - 8
[40] Hegselmann R, 2002, JASSS-J ARTIF SOC S, V5

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 →