Best supportive care (BSC) versus oxaliplatin, folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil (OFF) plus BSC in patients for second-line advanced pancreatic cancer: A phase III-study from the German CONKO-study group

被引:279
作者
Pelzer, Uwe [1 ]
Schwaner, Ingo [2 ]
Stieler, Jens
Adler, Mathias [3 ]
Seraphin, Joerg [4 ]
Doerken, Bernd
Riess, Hanna
Oettle, Helmut
机构
[1] Univ Med Berlin Charite, Ctr Tumormed, Dept Hematol Oncol, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
[2] Outpatient Dept, D-10709 Berlin, Germany
[3] Outpatient Dept, D-38100 Braunschweig, Germany
[4] Outpatient Dept, D-37154 Braunschweig, Germany
关键词
Pancreatic cancer; Gemcitabine; Best supportive care; Second-line; GEMCITABINE; CHEMOTHERAPY; THERAPY; DOCETAXEL; COMBINATION; BENEFIT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejca.2011.04.011
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Gemcitabine usually given until progressive disease (PD) is the main first-line treatment option for patients with inoperable advanced pancreatic cancer (APC). Currently there is no accepted active regimen for second-line chemotherapy. Previous phase II studies suggest clinical relevant activity of oxaliplatin, folinic acid and 5-FU (OFF). We initiated a phase III multicentre study comparing OFF versus best supportive care (BSC) in patients with APC progressing while on gemcitabine therapy. Methods: In this open randomized study, patients with CT and/or MRI confirmed progressive disease while on gemcitabine therapy were randomized 1:1 to OFF or BSC. Stratification included duration of first-line therapy (<3, 3 to 6 and >6 months), performance status (KPS 70-80%; 90-100%) and tumour stage (M1/M0). OFF consisted of folinic acid 200 mg/m(2) followed by 5-fluorouracil 2 g/m(2) (24 h) on d1, d8, d15, d22 and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) on days 8 and 22. After a rest of 3 weeks the next cycle was started on d43. A total of 165 patients were calculated to demonstrate a doubling of survival time after progression on first-line therapy. Results: After inclusion of forty six patients the trial was terminated according to predefined protocol regulations due to insufficient accrual (lack of acceptance of BSC by patients and physicians. Patient characteristics were well balanced between both study arms. The OFF regimen was well tolerated with more patients with grade I/II paraesthesia and grade nausea/emesis and diarrhoea. Median second-line survival was 4.82 [95% Confidence Interval; 4.29-5.35] months for OFF treatment and 2.30 [95% CI; 1.76-2.83] months with BSC alone (0.45 [95% CI: 0.24-0.83], p = 0.008). Median overall survival for the sequence GEM-OFF was 9.09 [95% CI: 6.97-11.21] and 7.90 [95% CI: 4.95-10.84] months for GEM-BSC (0.50 [95% CI: 0.27-0.95], p = 0.031) respectively. Interpretation: Although stopped prematurely, this randomized trial provides at first time evidence for the benefit of second-line chemotherapy as compared to BSC alone for patients with APC. OFF significantly prolonged survival time compared to BSC alone after failure of first-line therapy with gemcitabine. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1676 / 1681
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Second-line chemotherapy with pemetrexed after gemcitabine failure in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer:: a multicenter phase II trial
    Boeck, S.
    Weigang-Koehler, K.
    Fuchs, M.
    Kettner, E.
    Quietzsch, D.
    Trojan, J.
    Stoetzer, O.
    Zeuzem, S.
    Lordick, F.
    Koehne, C. -H.
    Kroening, H.
    Steinmetz, T.
    Depenbrock, H.
    Heinemann, V.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2007, 18 (04) : 745 - 751
  • [2] Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: A randomized trial
    Burris, HA
    Moore, MJ
    Andersen, J
    Green, MR
    Rothenberg, ML
    Madiano, MR
    Cripps, MC
    Portenoy, RK
    Storniolo, AM
    Tarassoff, P
    Nelson, R
    Dorr, FA
    Stephens, CD
    VanHoff, DD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (06) : 2403 - 2413
  • [3] Weekly docetaxel as salvage therapy in patients with gemcitabine-refractory metastatic pancreatic cancer
    Cereda, S.
    Reni, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMOTHERAPY, 2008, 20 (04) : 509 - 512
  • [4] Phase III Randomized Comparison of Gemcitabine Versus Gemcitabine Plus Capecitabine in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
    Cunningham, David
    Chau, Ian
    Stocken, Deborah D.
    Valle, Juan W.
    Smith, David
    Steward, William
    Harper, Peter G.
    Dunn, Janet
    Tudur-Smith, Catrin
    West, Julia
    Falk, Stephen
    Crellin, Adrian
    Adab, Fawzi
    Thompson, Joyce
    Leonard, Pauline
    Ostrowski, Joe
    Eatock, Martin
    Scheithauer, Werner
    Herrmann, Richard
    Neoptolemos, John P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (33) : 5513 - 5518
  • [5] HEINEMANN V, 2009, CANC RES S2, V3, pS43
  • [6] Meta-analysis of randomized trials: Evaluation of benefit from gemcitabine-based combination chemotherapy applied in advanced pancreatic cancer
    Heinemann, Volker
    Boeck, Stefan
    Hinke, Axel
    Labianca, Roberto
    Louvet, Christophe
    [J]. BMC CANCER, 2008, 8 (1)
  • [7] A Multicenter phase II study of docetaxel in combination with gefitinib in gemcitabine-pretreated patients with advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer
    Ignatiadis, Michail
    Polyzos, Aris
    Stathopoulos, George P.
    Tselepatiotis, Evangelos
    Christophylakis, Charalambos
    Kalbakis, Kostas
    Vamvakas, Lambros
    Kotsakis, Athanasios
    Potamianou, Anna
    Georgoulias, Vassilis
    [J]. ONCOLOGY, 2006, 71 (3-4) : 159 - 163
  • [8] Jemal A, 2009, CA-CANCER J CLIN, V59, P225, DOI [10.3322/caac.20006, 10.3322/caac.21387]
  • [9] Arsenic Trioxide in Patients With Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas Refractory to Gemcitabine A Phase II Trial of the University of Chicago Phase II Consortium
    Kindler, Hedy Lee
    Aklilu, Mebea
    Nattam, Sreenivasa
    Vokes, Everett E.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2008, 31 (06): : 553 - 556
  • [10] Excess toxicity associated with docetaxel and irinotecan in patients with metastatic, gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer: Results of a phase II study
    Ko, Andrew H.
    Dito, Elizabeth
    Schillinger, Brian
    Venook, Alan P.
    Bergsland, Emily K.
    Tempero, Margaret A.
    [J]. CANCER INVESTIGATION, 2008, 26 (01) : 47 - 52