Guidelines for development of diagnostic markers in bladder cancer

被引:32
作者
Goebell, Peter J. [1 ]
Groshen, Susan L. [2 ]
Schmitz-Draeger, Bernd J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Dept Urol, Maximilianspl 1, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
[2] Univ So Calif, Keck Sch Med, Kenneth Norris Jr Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Prevent Med, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[3] EuromedClin, Dept Urol, Furth, Germany
关键词
marker; bladder; cancer; phases;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-008-0240-9
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives Advances in understanding cancer at the molecular level have identified numerous alterations associated with cancer development and progression. The efforts in evaluating these putative biomarkers in clinical studies of patients with cancer are increasing in order to improve the clinical management of the disease. However, despite numerous attempts, the results of such biomarker studies are frequently inconsistent and sometimes even contradictory. Aim of this work is to discuss some of the recognized problems which have impeded our understanding of the role of new markers and prevented the introduction of these markers into patient management. Results These Problems include standardization issues, selection of patient cohorts and endpoints and statistical considerations. In order to improve and standardize marker development a stepwise procedure in four phases, analogous to clinical trials is proposed. Furthermore, a common terminology, considerations on the population to study as well as general recommendations for planning and conducting the evaluation of markers will be presented. Conclusion The implementation of this discussion may foster the integration of new tools and strategies screening, diagnosis and surveillance of patients with bladder cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 11
页数:7
相关论文
共 86 条
[41]   Almost all articles on cancer prognostic markers report statistically significant results [J].
Kyzas, Panayiotis A. ;
Denaxa-Kyza, Despina ;
Ioannidis, John P. A. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2007, 43 (17) :2559-2579
[42]   Quality of reporting of cancer prognostic marker studies: Association with reported prognostic effect [J].
Kyzas, Panayiotis A. ;
Denaxa-Kyza, Despina ;
Ioannidis, John P. A. .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2007, 99 (03) :236-243
[43]   Urine telomerase and bladder cancer detection [J].
Liu, BCS .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 295 (09) :998-998
[44]   uCyt+ test: Alternative to cystoscopy for less-invasive follow-up of patients with low risk of urothelial carcinoma [J].
Lodde, Michele ;
Mian, Christine ;
Comploj, Evi ;
Palermo, Salvatore ;
Longhi, Elena ;
Marberger, Michael ;
Pycha, Armin .
UROLOGY, 2006, 67 (05) :950-954
[45]   Bladder tumor markers beyond cytology:: International consensus panel on bladder tumor markers [J].
Lokeshwar, VB ;
Habuchi, T ;
Grossman, HB ;
Murphy, WM ;
Hautmann, SH ;
Hemstreet, GP ;
Bono, AV ;
Getzenberg, RH ;
Goebell, P ;
Schmitz-Dräger, BJ ;
Schalken, JA ;
Fradet, Y ;
Marberger, M ;
Messing, E ;
Droller, MJ .
UROLOGY, 2005, 66 (6A) :35-63
[46]   Current bladder tumor tests: Does their projected utility fulfill clinical necessity? [J].
Lokeshwar, VB ;
Soloway, MS .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 165 (04) :1067-1077
[47]  
LOKESHWAR VB, 2004, AM CANC SOC ATLAS CL, P160
[48]  
MALKIN A, 1992, BASIC SCI ONCOLOGY
[49]   Comparative diagnostic value of urine cytology, UBC-ELISA, and fluorescence in situ hybridization for detection of transitional cell carcinoma of urinary bladder in routine clinical practice [J].
May, Matthias ;
Hakenberg, Oliver W. ;
Gunia, Sven ;
Pohling, Peter ;
Helke, Christian ;
Luebbe, Lieselotte ;
Nowack, Rudolf ;
Siegsmund, Michael ;
Hoschke, Bernd .
UROLOGY, 2007, 70 (03) :449-453
[50]   BREAST-CANCER PROGNOSTIC FACTORS - EVALUATION GUIDELINES [J].
MCGUIRE, WL .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1991, 83 (03) :154-155