Implementing online evidence-based care pathways: A mixed-methods study across primary and secondary care

被引:13
作者
Akehurst, Joy [1 ]
Sattar, Zeibeda [2 ]
Gordon, Isabel [1 ]
Ling, Jonathan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sunderland, Sunderland, England
[2] Northumbria Univ, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
关键词
CLINICAL GUIDELINES; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022991
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim To understand what contextual influences, mechanisms and outcomes affect the implementation and use of localised, online care pathways (HealthPathways) in primary and secondary care. Design and procedure Mixed-measures design. Quantitative data included number of page views and conditions viewed. Qualitative data from semistructured interviews and focus groups were gathered over a 6-month period, and analysed using NVivo software. Setting The first HealthPathways UK site, South Tyneside, England. Participants General practitioners, nurses, practice managers, hospital consultants and system leaders (managers, commissioners) (n = 76). Results Use of the pathways significantly increased over time. Themes were developed showing how online care pathways were used-leadership, pre-existing networks and relationships; development of systems and processes for care pathways, the use of online care pathways to support decision-making and referral, and perceived availability of resources. Inter-related themes were arranged into configurations consisting of contextual influences, mechanisms and outcomes. Recommendations were made for future implementations, such as improved data collection processes to understand how and why there was variance in the use of pathways. Conclusions This study was early in the implementation process; however, emerging themes will facilitate the future implementation and use of online care pathways. Recommendations are made for further research to include other health and social care users and patients to inform future developments.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 40 条
[11]  
England NHS, INT CAR PION
[12]   Facilitators and barriers to implementing clinical care pathways [J].
Evans-Lacko, Sara ;
Jarrett, Manuela ;
McCrone, Paul ;
Thornicroft, Graham .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2010, 10
[13]   Developing a checklist for guideline implementation planning: review and synthesis of guideline development and implementation advice [J].
Gagliardi, Anna R. ;
Marshall, Catherine ;
Huckson, Sue ;
James, Roberta ;
Moore, Val .
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2015, 10
[14]   Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations [J].
Greenhalgh, T ;
Robert, G ;
Macfarlane, F ;
Bate, P ;
Kyriakidou, O .
MILBANK QUARTERLY, 2004, 82 (04) :581-629
[15]   Protocol-the RAMESES II study: developing guidance and reporting standards for realist evaluation [J].
Greenhalgh, Trisha ;
Wong, Geoff ;
Jagosh, Justin ;
Greenhalgh, Joanne ;
Manzano, Ana ;
Westhorp, Gill ;
Pawson, Ray .
BMJ OPEN, 2015, 5 (08)
[16]   EFFECT OF CLINICAL GUIDELINES ON MEDICAL-PRACTICE - A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF RIGOROUS EVALUATIONS [J].
GRIMSHAW, JM ;
RUSSELL, IT .
LANCET, 1993, 342 (8883) :1317-1322
[17]  
Health Education England, 2017, BUILD DIG READ WORKF
[18]  
Hindle Don, 2005, Aust Health Rev, V29, P94
[19]   Systematic review of whether nurse practitioners working in primary care can provide equivalent care to doctors [J].
Horrocks, S ;
Anderson, E ;
Salisbury, C .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 324 (7341) :819-823
[20]   The concept of mechanism from a realist approach: a scoping review to facilitate its operationalization in public health program evaluation [J].
Lacouture, Anthony ;
Breton, Eric ;
Guichard, Anne ;
Ridde, Valery .
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2015, 10