The honeycomb of engineering framework: Philosophy of engineering guiding precollege engineering education

被引:13
|
作者
Purzer, Senay [1 ]
Quintana-Cifuentes, Jenny [1 ]
Menekse, Muhsin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Coll Engn, Sch Engn Educ, 516 Northwestern Ave, W Lafayette, IN 47906 USA
[2] Purdue Univ, Coll Educ, Dept Curriculum & Instruct, W Lafayette, IN 47906 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
design-build-test; engineering analysis; engineering science; epistemology; honeycomb framework; K-12; optimization; precollege; reverse engineering; user-centered design; DESIGN; INQUIRY; SCIENCE; TECHNOLOGY; KNOWLEDGE; EXPERT;
D O I
10.1002/jee.20441
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background Understanding the nature of engineering is important for shaping engineering education, especially precollege education. While much research has established the pedagogical benefits of teaching engineering in kindergarten through 12th grade (K-12), the philosophical foundations of engineering remain under-examined. Purpose This conceptual paper introduces the honeycomb of engineering framework, which offers an epistemologically justified theoretical position and a pedagogical lens that can be used to examine ways engineering concepts and practices are taught in precollege education. Scope/Method The honeycomb of engineering was developed as a descriptive framework by examining existing literature over a wide range of related disciplines such as the philosophy of engineering and technology, as well as design thinking and practice. The pedagogical translation of the framework was then developed to examine published precollege engineering curricula. Results The framework categorizes the multiple goals of engineering using an ontological classification of engineering inquiries anchored in the central practice of negotiating risks and benefits (i.e., trade-offs). This framework also illustrates the adaptability of design methodology in guiding six inquiries: (1) user-centered design, (2) design-build-test, (3) engineering science, (4) optimization, (5) engineering analysis, and (6) reverse engineering. The published curricula represented these inquiries with varying degrees, with design-build-test lessons seeing the most representation followed by user-centered design. Conclusions The honeycomb of engineering framework delineates variations in engineering education based on an epistemological explanation. The pedagogical translations offer guidance to educators, researchers, and curriculum designers for differentiating curricular aims and learning outcomes resulting from participation in different engineering inquiries.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 39
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Art of Engineering Education
    Vostracky, Zdenek
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC SYMPOSIUM ON ELECTRICAL POWER ENGINEERING (ELEKTROENERGETIKA 2015), 2015, : 25 - 27
  • [32] Five Major Shifts in 100 Years of Engineering Education
    Froyd, Jeffrey E.
    Wankat, Phillip C.
    Smith, Karl A.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 2012, 100 : 1344 - 1360
  • [33] What Is the State of the Art of Systematic Review in Engineering Education?
    Borrego, Maura
    Foster, Margaret J.
    Froyd, Jeffrey E.
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2015, 104 (02) : 212 - 242
  • [34] Engineering education: an integrated problem-solving framework for discipline-specific professional development in mining engineering
    Haupt, G.
    Webber-Youngman, R. C. W.
    JOURNAL OF THE SOUTHERN AFRICAN INSTITUTE OF MINING AND METALLURGY, 2018, 118 (01) : 27 - 37
  • [35] Engineering education in schools
    Lewis, Theodore
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2007, 23 (05) : 843 - 852
  • [36] Engineering education partnership
    Siller, T. J.
    De Miranda, M. A.
    Whaley, D. C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2007, 23 (01) : 58 - 64
  • [37] Factors That Influence Dissemination in Engineering Education
    Hazen, Benjamin T.
    Wu, Yun
    Sankar, Chetan S.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EDUCATION, 2012, 55 (03) : 384 - 393
  • [38] Epistemology of Knowledge for Technical and Engineering Education
    Hamzah, Rohana
    Ismail, Sarimah
    Isa, Kamarudzaman Md
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TEACHING AND LEARNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION IN CONJUNCTION WITH REGIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING EDUCATION AND RESEARCH IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2012, 56 : 108 - 116
  • [39] Modeling and simulation practices in engineering education
    Magana, Alejandra J.
    de Jong, Ton
    COMPUTER APPLICATIONS IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2018, 26 (04) : 731 - 738
  • [40] Multi-disciplinary approach in engineering education: learning with additive manufacturing and reverse engineering
    Gatto, Andrea
    Bassoli, Elena
    Denti, Lucia
    Iuliano, Luca
    Minetola, Paolo
    RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL, 2015, 21 (05) : 598 - 603