The honeycomb of engineering framework: Philosophy of engineering guiding precollege engineering education

被引:13
|
作者
Purzer, Senay [1 ]
Quintana-Cifuentes, Jenny [1 ]
Menekse, Muhsin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Coll Engn, Sch Engn Educ, 516 Northwestern Ave, W Lafayette, IN 47906 USA
[2] Purdue Univ, Coll Educ, Dept Curriculum & Instruct, W Lafayette, IN 47906 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
design-build-test; engineering analysis; engineering science; epistemology; honeycomb framework; K-12; optimization; precollege; reverse engineering; user-centered design; DESIGN; INQUIRY; SCIENCE; TECHNOLOGY; KNOWLEDGE; EXPERT;
D O I
10.1002/jee.20441
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background Understanding the nature of engineering is important for shaping engineering education, especially precollege education. While much research has established the pedagogical benefits of teaching engineering in kindergarten through 12th grade (K-12), the philosophical foundations of engineering remain under-examined. Purpose This conceptual paper introduces the honeycomb of engineering framework, which offers an epistemologically justified theoretical position and a pedagogical lens that can be used to examine ways engineering concepts and practices are taught in precollege education. Scope/Method The honeycomb of engineering was developed as a descriptive framework by examining existing literature over a wide range of related disciplines such as the philosophy of engineering and technology, as well as design thinking and practice. The pedagogical translation of the framework was then developed to examine published precollege engineering curricula. Results The framework categorizes the multiple goals of engineering using an ontological classification of engineering inquiries anchored in the central practice of negotiating risks and benefits (i.e., trade-offs). This framework also illustrates the adaptability of design methodology in guiding six inquiries: (1) user-centered design, (2) design-build-test, (3) engineering science, (4) optimization, (5) engineering analysis, and (6) reverse engineering. The published curricula represented these inquiries with varying degrees, with design-build-test lessons seeing the most representation followed by user-centered design. Conclusions The honeycomb of engineering framework delineates variations in engineering education based on an epistemological explanation. The pedagogical translations offer guidance to educators, researchers, and curriculum designers for differentiating curricular aims and learning outcomes resulting from participation in different engineering inquiries.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 39
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] MADE: A Multidisciplinary Computational Framework for Aerospace Engineering Education
    Seth, Arjit
    Redonnet, Stephane
    Liem, Rhea P.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EDUCATION, 2023, 66 (06) : 622 - 631
  • [22] Epistemic Practices of Engineering for Education
    Cunningham, Christine M.
    Kelly, Gregory J.
    SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2017, 101 (03) : 486 - 505
  • [23] Indigenizing Engineering education in Canada: critically considered
    Cicek, Jillian Seniuk
    Steele, Alan
    Gauthier, Sarah
    Mante, Afua Adobea
    Wolf, Pamela
    Robinson, Mary
    Mattucci, Stephen
    TEACHING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2021, 26 (7-8) : 1038 - 1059
  • [24] Development of an Engineering Education Framework for Aerodynamic Shape Optimization
    Kwon, Hyung-Il
    Kim, Saji
    Lee, Hakjin
    Ryu, Minseok
    Kim, Taehee
    Choi, Seongim
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AERONAUTICAL AND SPACE SCIENCES, 2013, 14 (04) : 297 - 309
  • [25] Service Systems Engineering Framework Based on Combining Service Engineering and Systems Engineering Methodologies
    Suhardi
    Kurniawan, Novianto Budi
    Sembiring, Jaka
    Yustianto, Purnomo
    2017 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH AND INNOVATION IN INFORMATION SYSTEMS (ICRIIS 2017): SOCIAL TRANSFORMATION THROUGH DATA SCIENCE, 2017,
  • [26] Engineering the future: transversal skills in Engineering Doctoral Education
    Martins, Helena
    Freitas, Ana
    Direito, Ines
    Salgado, Ana
    2021 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE PORTUGUESE SOCIETY FOR ENGINEERING EDUCATION (CISPEE), 2021,
  • [27] Coffee and Engineering Education: Lessons from an Engineering Course on Technology for Coffee Production
    Reynolds-Cuellar, Pedro
    Villamil-Mejia, Alejandra
    Bello, Alexander Freese
    2020 IEEE FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION CONFERENCE (FIE 2020), 2020,
  • [28] Aligning Engineering Education for Sustainable Development through Governance: The Case of the International Center for Engineering Education in China
    Chen, Huimin
    Wang, Sunyu
    Li, Yue
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (21)
  • [29] Engineering Students' Epistemological Views on Mathematical Methods in Engineering
    Gainsburg, Julie
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2015, 104 (02) : 139 - 166
  • [30] A Conceptual Framework and a Research Roadmap towards Enhancing Team Working in Engineering Education
    Takai, Shun
    Esterman, Marcos
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2019, VOL 3, 2020,