The honeycomb of engineering framework: Philosophy of engineering guiding precollege engineering education

被引:13
|
作者
Purzer, Senay [1 ]
Quintana-Cifuentes, Jenny [1 ]
Menekse, Muhsin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Coll Engn, Sch Engn Educ, 516 Northwestern Ave, W Lafayette, IN 47906 USA
[2] Purdue Univ, Coll Educ, Dept Curriculum & Instruct, W Lafayette, IN 47906 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
design-build-test; engineering analysis; engineering science; epistemology; honeycomb framework; K-12; optimization; precollege; reverse engineering; user-centered design; DESIGN; INQUIRY; SCIENCE; TECHNOLOGY; KNOWLEDGE; EXPERT;
D O I
10.1002/jee.20441
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background Understanding the nature of engineering is important for shaping engineering education, especially precollege education. While much research has established the pedagogical benefits of teaching engineering in kindergarten through 12th grade (K-12), the philosophical foundations of engineering remain under-examined. Purpose This conceptual paper introduces the honeycomb of engineering framework, which offers an epistemologically justified theoretical position and a pedagogical lens that can be used to examine ways engineering concepts and practices are taught in precollege education. Scope/Method The honeycomb of engineering was developed as a descriptive framework by examining existing literature over a wide range of related disciplines such as the philosophy of engineering and technology, as well as design thinking and practice. The pedagogical translation of the framework was then developed to examine published precollege engineering curricula. Results The framework categorizes the multiple goals of engineering using an ontological classification of engineering inquiries anchored in the central practice of negotiating risks and benefits (i.e., trade-offs). This framework also illustrates the adaptability of design methodology in guiding six inquiries: (1) user-centered design, (2) design-build-test, (3) engineering science, (4) optimization, (5) engineering analysis, and (6) reverse engineering. The published curricula represented these inquiries with varying degrees, with design-build-test lessons seeing the most representation followed by user-centered design. Conclusions The honeycomb of engineering framework delineates variations in engineering education based on an epistemological explanation. The pedagogical translations offer guidance to educators, researchers, and curriculum designers for differentiating curricular aims and learning outcomes resulting from participation in different engineering inquiries.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 39
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Matching pedagogical intent with engineering design process models for precollege education
    Tate, Derrick
    Chandler, John
    Fontenot, A. Dean
    Talkmitt, Susan
    AI EDAM-ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN ANALYSIS AND MANUFACTURING, 2010, 24 (03): : 379 - 395
  • [2] A Select and Annotated Bibliography of Philosophy in Engineering Education
    Heywood, John
    Carberry, Adam
    Grimson, William
    2011 FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION CONFERENCE (FIE), 2011,
  • [3] A framework for building information modeling implementation in engineering education
    Boton, Conrad
    Forgues, Daniel
    Halin, Gilles
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2018, 45 (10) : 866 - 877
  • [4] Applying philosophical inquiry: Bringing future engineering education researchers into the philosophy of engineering education
    Adams, Robin S.
    Pawley, Alice L.
    Jesiek, Brent K.
    2012 FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION CONFERENCE (FIE), 2012,
  • [5] FROM PHILOSOPHY OF TECHNOLOGY TO PHILOSOPHY OF ENGINEERING
    Lopez-Cruz, Orlando
    REVISTA COLOMBIANA DE FILOSOFIA DE LA CIENCIA, 2020, 20 (41): : 63 - 111
  • [6] A Historical Overview of Recent Developments in the Search for a Philosophy of Engineering Education
    Heywood, John
    2011 FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION CONFERENCE (FIE), 2011,
  • [7] A Team Competency Framework for Engineering Entrepreneurship Education
    Neumeyer, Xaver
    Santos, Susana C.
    2020 IEEE TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE (TEMSCON 2020), 2020,
  • [8] Conducting the instrumentalists: a framework for engineering liberal education
    Nieusma, Dean
    ENGINEERING STUDIES, 2015, 7 (2-3) : 159 - 163
  • [9] ICTs and Learning: A Challenge in the Engineering Education
    Teresa Garcia-Alvarez, Maria
    Suarez Alvarez, Eva
    Quiroga Garcia, Raquel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2014, 30 (03) : 636 - 643
  • [10] Conceptual Framework for the Use of Building Information Modeling in Engineering Education
    Zamora-Polo, Francisco
    Luque-Sendra, Amalia
    Aguayo-Gonzalez, Francisco
    Sanchez-Martin, Jesus
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2019, 35 (03) : 744 - 755