Estimating Willingness-to-pay with Choice-based Conjoint Analysis - Can Consumer Characteristics Explain Variations in Accuracy?

被引:18
作者
Sichtmann, Christina [1 ]
Wilken, Robert [2 ]
Diamantopoulos, Adamantios [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vienna, Chair Int Mkt, A-1210 Vienna, Austria
[2] ESCP Europe Business Sch, D-14059 Berlin, Germany
关键词
PRICE; INVOLVEMENT; MODELS; REPRESENTATIONS; UNCERTAINTY; PREDICTION; DISCRETE; VALIDITY; UTILITY; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00696.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Knowing consumers' willingness to pay (WTP) is crucial for making effective pricing decisions. We assess the accuracy of choice-based conjoint analysis (CBCA), a method strongly supported by behavioural theory, in the context of WTP measurement at the individual level. Furthermore, we analyse whether variations in the accuracy of WTP estimates derived by CBCA can be explained by consumers' involvement, brand awareness and the strength of consumer preferences. The results show that CBCA does not provide accurate WTP estimates and, on average, grossly overestimates the true WTP of consumers. No empirical evidence can be found that consideration of the above-mentioned consumer characteristics results in more accurate WTP values.
引用
收藏
页码:628 / 645
页数:18
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]   DIMENSIONS OF CONSUMER EXPERTISE [J].
ALBA, JW ;
HUTCHINSON, JW .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1987, 13 (04) :411-454
[2]  
Albers S., 2007, MARKETING ZFP, V29, P7
[3]   Adjusting choice models to better predict market behavior [J].
Allenby, G ;
Fennell, G ;
Huber, J ;
Eagle, T ;
Gilbride, T ;
Horsky, D ;
Kim, J ;
Lenk, P ;
Johnson, R ;
Ofek, E ;
Orme, B ;
Otter, T ;
Walker, J .
MARKETING LETTERS, 2005, 16 (3-4) :197-208
[4]   USING EXTREMES TO DESIGN PRODUCTS AND SEGMENT MARKETS [J].
ALLENBY, GM ;
GINTER, JL .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1995, 32 (04) :392-403
[5]   An empirical comparison of logit choice models with discrete versus continuous representations of heterogeneity [J].
Andrews, RL ;
Ainslie, A ;
Currim, IS .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2002, 39 (04) :479-487
[6]   Hierarchical Bayes versus finite mixture conjoint analysis models: A comparison of fit, prediction, and partworth recovery [J].
Andrews, RL ;
Ansari, A ;
Currim, IS .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2002, 39 (01) :87-98
[7]   Improving parameter estimates and model prediction by aggregate customization in choice experiments [J].
Arora, N ;
Huber, J .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2001, 28 (02) :273-283
[8]  
Backhaus K, 2005, INT J MARKET RES, V47, P543
[9]  
Baker ThomasL., 2002, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, V10, P45, DOI [DOI 10.1080/10696679.2002.11501925, 10.1080/10696679.2002.11501925]
[10]   MEASURING UTILITY BY A SINGLE-RESPONSE SEQUENTIAL METHOD [J].
BECKER, GM ;
DEGROOT, MH ;
MARSCHAK, J .
BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 1964, 9 (03) :226-232