Cognitive Antenna Selection in MIMO Imaging Radar

被引:4
作者
Ding, Shanshan [1 ]
Tong, Ningning [2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Yongshun [2 ,3 ]
Hu, Xiaowei [2 ,3 ]
Zhao, Xiaoru [1 ]
机构
[1] Air Force Engn Univ, Grad Coll, Xian 710051, Peoples R China
[2] Air Force Engn Univ, Xian 710051, Peoples R China
[3] Collaborat Innovat Ctr Informat Sensing & Underst, Xian 710077, Peoples R China
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING | 2021年 / 59卷 / 12期
基金
中国博士后科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Radar imaging; Computer aided software engineering; Radar antennas; Imaging; Antenna arrays; MIMO communication; Scattering; Cognitive antenna selection (CASE); compressive sensing (CS); dimension reduction (DR); multi-in multi-out (MIMO) radar; radar imaging; SPARSE ARRAY DESIGN;
D O I
10.1109/TGRS.2020.3047610
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
A cognitive antenna selection strategy for multi-in multi-out (MIMO) imaging radar is proposed in this article. The basic idea of our strategy relies on the dynamic selection of the antenna location according to the feedback information to enhance the image quality and reduce the computational burden simultaneously. The aim of our strategy is to indirectly minimize the mean squared error associated with the amplitudes and positions of the strong scattering centers of the target through the frame potential. Specifically, it is assumed that the imaging process is initially performed via a conventional uniform linear array/random sparse array of collocated MIMO radar; hence, based on the collected data, an initial image of the target is derived (perception). Then, the accuracy of low-resolution images is enhanced progressively according to the cognitive paradigm via a specific antenna location selection at the next transmission (action). Benefit from the enhanced accuracy, the support area of targets can be estimated to reduce the dimension of the undersampling matrix and, finally, the computational burden in the subsequent high-resolution image reconstruction process is reduced. The simulation results highlight the capabilities of our cognitive approach to provide more interesting benefits in imaging than the random selection strategy and demonstrate the enhanced imaging performance of cognitive sparse MIMO array under the condition of limited antennas and noise.
引用
收藏
页码:9829 / 9841
页数:13
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] NEW LOOK AT STATISTICAL-MODEL IDENTIFICATION
    AKAIKE, H
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1974, AC19 (06) : 716 - 723
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1988, DISCRETE OPTIM
  • [3] Autofocusing of inverse synthetic aperture radar images using contrast optimization
    Berizzi, F
    Corsini, G
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AEROSPACE AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, 1996, 32 (03) : 1185 - 1191
  • [4] Intelligent Massive MIMO Antenna Selection Using Monte Carlo Tree Search
    Chen, Jienan
    Chen, Siyu
    Qi, Yunlong
    Fu, Shengli
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2019, 67 (20) : 5380 - 5390
  • [5] Das, 2011, P 28 INT C MACH LEAR, P1057
  • [6] Super-resolution 3D imaging in MIMO radar using spectrum estimation theory
    Ding, Shanshan
    Tong, Ningning
    Zhang, Yongshun
    Hu, Xiaowei
    [J]. IET RADAR SONAR AND NAVIGATION, 2017, 11 (02) : 304 - 312
  • [7] Cognitive radar antenna selection via deep learning
    Elbir, Ahmet M.
    Mishra, Kumar Vijay
    Eldar, Yonina C.
    [J]. IET RADAR SONAR AND NAVIGATION, 2019, 13 (06) : 871 - 880
  • [8] 3-D Ground-Based Imaging Radar Based on C-Band Cross-MIMO Array and Tensor Compressive Sensing
    Feng, Weike
    Friedt, Jean-Michel
    Nico, Giovanni
    Sato, Motoyuki
    [J]. IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, 2019, 16 (10) : 1585 - 1589
  • [9] GB-SAR Interferometry Based on Dimension-Reduced Compressive Sensing and Multiple Measurement Vectors Model
    Feng, Weike
    Nico, Giovanni
    Sato, Motoyuki
    [J]. IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, 2019, 16 (01) : 70 - 74
  • [10] Online Distributed Sensor Selection
    Golovin, Daniel
    Faulkner, Matthew
    Krause, Andreas
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH ACM/IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION PROCESSING IN SENSOR NETWORKS, 2010, : 220 - 231