Performance measures and quality tools in Portuguese small and medium enterprises: Survey results

被引:57
作者
Sousa, SD
Aspinwall, E
Sampaio, PA
Rodrigues, AG
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Sch Engn, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Minho, P-4719 Braga, Portugal
关键词
D O I
10.1080/14783360500054434
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper describes a survey that was undertaken at the initial stage of a research project looking at performance measures and quality tools. Its objective was to determine the level of knowledge of performance measures and their degree of implementation in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in Portugal. It also addressed the level of use of quality tools in the same companies, since they provide some degree of integration between the external requirements of a business and its internal activities and performance (Gregory, 1993). Most research to date has concentrated on large companies and so an important part of this work is to assess whether or not SMEs can adopt similar approaches with respect to quality, or in general, to management methodologies. For example, are ISO standards, TQM, balanced scorecard, or other excellence models beneficial to all companies and how are they implemented? The paper starts with a brief literature review and then presents the methodology used for the survey, the questionnaire construction and the pilot study. The full survey is described together with a comprehensive analysis of the results, including respondent bias and questionnaire reliability and validity. The general opinions of Portuguese SMEs with regard to performance measurement, the most important measures to use and the biggest obstacles to their adopting new ones are discussed. The paper culminates with an analysis of quality tools and the conclusions drawn from the study.
引用
收藏
页码:277 / 307
页数:31
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
ANDERSEN H, 2001, 4 SME INT C AALB DEN
[2]  
André MM, 2000, TOTAL QUAL MANAGE, V11, pS929
[3]  
[Anonymous], INT J QUALITY RELIAB
[4]  
[Anonymous], INT J QUALITY RELIAB
[5]  
*APCER, 2002, ASS PORT CERT
[6]   ESTIMATING NONRESPONSE BIAS IN MAIL SURVEYS [J].
ARMSTRONG, JS ;
OVERTON, TS .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1977, 14 (03) :396-402
[7]  
AZZONE G, 1991, INT J OPERATIONS PRO, V11
[8]  
Basu R, 2001, MEAS BUS EXCELL, V5, P7, DOI DOI 10.1108/EUM0000000006514
[9]   Dynamics of performance measurement systems [J].
Bititci, US ;
Turner, T ;
Begemann, C .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2000, 20 (5-6) :692-704
[10]  
Bogan C.E., 1994, BENCHMARKING BEST PR