Psychological intervention during spinal rehabilitation: a preliminary study

被引:22
作者
Dorstyn, D. S. [1 ,2 ]
Mathias, J. L. [2 ]
Denson, L. A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Hampstead Rehabil Ctr, S Australian Spinal Cord Injury Serv, Northfield, SA 5085, Australia
[2] Univ Adelaide, Sch Psychol, Adelaide, SA, Australia
关键词
depression; anxiety; stress; rehabilitation; cognitive behavioural treatment; CORD-INJURY; DEPRESSION; ANXIETY;
D O I
10.1038/sc.2009.161
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study design: A repeated measures, non-randomised controlled trial. Objective: To examine the effectiveness of individualised cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) on the psychological adjustment of patients undergoing rehabilitation for newly acquired spinal cord injury. Setting: South Australian Spinal Cord Injury Service, Hampstead Rehabilitation Centre, South Australia, Australia. Methods: Eleven participants received individual CBT as part of their spinal rehabilitation. Self-reported levels of depression, anxiety and stress were assessed before the intervention, at week 12 of rehabilitation and at 3 months post-discharge, using the depression, anxiety and stress scales (DASS-21). Functional independence was also assessed, using the Functional Independence Measure (FIM). Responses were compared with 13 participants, closely matched on demographic and injury variables, who received standard psychological care (that is, assessment and monitoring only). Results: Depression scores for treatment participants showed a significant time effect, with worsening symptoms reported at three-month follow-up, after CBT was discontinued. In contrast, the DASS-21 scores of standard care participants remained at subclinical levels throughout the study. Clinical improvements in symptoms of anxiety and stress were also reported by the treatment group as inpatient therapy progressed. Conclusion: Targeted, individualised psychological treatment contributed to short-term, meaningful improvements in emotional outcomes for individuals reporting psychological morbidity after recent spinal injury. The results also highlight the need for ongoing access to specialised, psychological services post-discharge. Replication of these results with a larger sample is required before definitive conclusions can be drawn. Spinal Cord (2010) 48, 756-761; doi:10.1038/sc.2009.161; published online 22 December 2009
引用
收藏
页码:756 / 761
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
BURTON C, 2005, WORKFORCE SURVEY PSY
[2]   A POWER PRIMER [J].
COHEN, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1992, 112 (01) :155-159
[3]   Psychological morbidity and spinal cord injury: a systematic review [J].
Craig, A. ;
Tran, Y. ;
Middleton, J. .
SPINAL CORD, 2009, 47 (02) :108-114
[4]   Long-term psychological outcomes in spinal cord injured persons: Results of a controlled trial using cognitive behavior therapy [J].
Craig, AR ;
Hancock, K ;
Dickson, H ;
Chang, E .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1997, 78 (01) :33-38
[5]   A structured review of outcome measures used for the assessment of rehabilitation interventions for spinal cord injury [J].
Dawson, J. ;
Shamley, D. ;
Jamous, M. A. .
SPINAL CORD, 2008, 46 (12) :768-780
[6]  
Hamilton B., 1987, Rehabilitation outcomes: analysis and measurement, V1st
[7]  
Huebner RA, 2004, SPR S REHAB, P244
[8]   Coping effectiveness training reduces depression and anxiety following traumatic spinal cord injuries [J].
Kennedy, P ;
Duff, J ;
Evans, M ;
Beedie, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 42 :41-52
[9]  
KRAEMER H, 1991, MANY SUBJECTS STAT P
[10]  
Lovibond S.H., 1995, Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales, V2