Benefits and harms of lower blood pressure treatment targets: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised placebo-controlled trials

被引:12
作者
Brunstrom, Mattias [1 ]
Carlberg, Bo [1 ]
机构
[1] Umea Univ, Dept Publ Hlth & Clin Med, Umea, Sweden
关键词
Hypertension; Antihypertensive agent; Systolic blood pressure; Systematic Review; Meta-analysis; CONVERTING-ENZYME-INHIBITION; CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS; EUROPEAN-SOCIETY; TASK-FORCE; CORONARY; HYPERTENSION; GUIDELINES; RAMIPRIL; MANAGEMENT; PROGRESSION;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026686
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To assess the effect of antihypertensive treatment in the 130-140mm Hg systolic blood pressure range. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Information sources PubMed, CDSR and DARE were searched for the systematic reviews, which were manually browsed for clinical trials. PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for trials directly in February 2018. Eligibility criteria Randomised double-blind trials with >= 1000 patient-years of follow-up, comparing any antihypertensive agent against placebo. Data extraction and risk of bias Two reviewers extracted study-level data, and assessed risk of bias using Cochrane Collaborations risk of bias assessment tool, independently. Main outcomes and measures Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, major cardiovascular events and discontinuation due to adverse events. Secondary outcomes were cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, hypotension-related adverse events and renal impairment. Results Eighteen trials, including 92 567 participants (34% women, mean age 63 years), fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Primary preventive antihypertensive treatment was associated with a neutral effect on all-cause mortality (relative risk 1.00, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.06) and major cardiovascular events (1.01, 0.96 to 1.06), but an increased risk of discontinuation due to adverse events (1.23, 1.03 to 1.47). None of the secondary efficacy outcomes were significantly reduced, but the risk of hypotension-related adverse events increased with treatment (1.71, 1.32 to 2.22). In coronary artery disease secondary prevention, antihypertensive treatment was associated with reduced risk of all-cause mortality (0.91, 0.83 to 0.99) and major cardiovascular events (0.85, 0.77 to 0.94), but doubled the risk of adverse events leading to discontinuation (2.05, 1.62 to 2.61). Conclusion Primary preventive blood pressure lowering in the 130-140mm Hg systolic blood pressure range adds no cardiovascular benefit, but increases the risk of adverse events. In the secondary prevention, benefits should be weighed against harms.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, JAMA INTERN MED, DOI DOI 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.6015
[2]  
[Anonymous], N ENGL J MED
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, LANCET, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01225-8
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, J AM COLL CARDIOL
[5]   Effects of fosinopril and pravastatin on cardiovascular events in subjects with microalbuminuria [J].
Asselbergs, FW ;
Diercks, GFH ;
Hillege, HL ;
van Boven, AJ ;
Janssen, WMT ;
Voors, AA ;
de Zeeuw, D ;
de Jong, PE ;
van Veldhuisen, DJ ;
van Gilst, WH .
CIRCULATION, 2004, 110 (18) :2809-2816
[6]   Blood Pressure Targets in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus/Impaired Fasting Glucose Observations From Traditional and Bayesian Random-Effects Meta-Analyses of Randomized Trials [J].
Bangalore, Sripal ;
Kumar, Sunil ;
Lobach, Iryna ;
Messerli, Franz H. .
CIRCULATION, 2011, 123 (24) :2799-+
[7]   Intensive systolic blood pressure control and incident chronic kidney disease in people with and without diabetes mellitus: secondary analyses of two randomised controlled trials [J].
Beddhu, Srinivasan ;
Greene, Tom ;
Boucher, Robert ;
Cushman, William C. ;
Wei, Guo ;
Stoddard, Gregory ;
Ix, Joachim H. ;
Chonchol, Michel ;
Kramer, Holly ;
Cheung, Alfred K. ;
Kimmel, Paul L. ;
Whelton, Paul K. ;
Chertow, Glenn M. .
LANCET DIABETES & ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2018, 6 (07) :555-563
[8]  
Bosch J, 2006, NEW ENGL J MED, V355, P1551
[9]  
Braunwald E, 2004, NEW ENGL J MED, V351, P2058
[10]   Standardization according to blood pressure lowering inmeta-analyses of antihypertensive trials: comparison of three methodological approaches [J].
Brunstrom, Mattias ;
Carlberg, Bo .
JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2018, 36 (01) :4-15