Prognostic factors of whiplash-associated disorders: A systematic review of prospective cohort studies

被引:317
作者
Scholten-Peeters, GGM
Verhagen, AP
Bekkering, GE
van der Windt, DAWM
Barnsley, L
Oostendorp, RAB
Hendriks, EJM
机构
[1] Dutch Natl Inst Allied Hlth Profess, NL-3800 BD Amersfoort, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Brussels, Fac Med & Pharmacol, Dept Manual Therapy, Brussels, Belgium
[3] Spine & Rehabil Ctr, Uden, Netherlands
[4] Catholic Univ Nijmegen, Ctr Qual Care Res, Univ Med Ctr, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[5] Erasmus MC, Dept Gen Practice, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[6] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Gen Practice, Inst Res Extramural Med, Med Ctr, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[7] Concord Hosp, Dept Rheumatol, Concord, NSW, Australia
[8] Maastricht Univ, Dept Epidemiol, Ctr Evidence Based Physiotherapy, Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
functional recovery; prognostic factors; systematic review; whiplash;
D O I
10.1016/S0304-3959(03)00050-2
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
We present a systematic review of prospective cohort studies. Our aim was to assess prognostic factors associated with functional recovery of patients with whiplash injuries. The failure of some patients to recover following whiplash injury has been linked to a number of prognostic factors. However, there is some inconsistency in the literature and there have been no systematic attempts to analyze the level of evidence for prognostic factors in whiplash recovery. Studies were selected for inclusion following a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, the database of the Dutch Institute of Allied Health Professions up until April 2002 and hand searches of the reference lists of retrieved articles. Studies were selected if the objective was to assess prognostic factors associated with recovery; the design was a prospective cohort study; the study population included at least an identifiable subgroup of patients suffering from a whiplash injury; and the paper was a full report published in English, German, French or Dutch. The methodological quality was independently assessed by two reviewers. A study was considered to be of 'high quality' if it satisfied at least 50% of the maximum available quality score. Two independent reviewers extracted data and the association between prognostic factors and functional recovery was calculated in terms of risk estimates. Fifty papers reporting on twenty-nine cohorts were included in the review. Twelve cohorts were considered to be of 'high quality'. Because of the heterogeneity of patient selection, type of prognostic factors and outcome measures, no statistical pooling was able to be performed. Strong evidence was found for high initial pain intensity being an adverse prognostic factor. There was strong evidence that for older age, female gender, high acute psychological response, angular deformity of the neck, rear-end collision, and compensation not being associated with an adverse prognosis. Several physical (e.g. restricted range of motion, high number of complaints), psychosocial (previous psychological problems), neuropsychosocial factors (nervousness), crash related (e.g. accident on highway) and treatment related factors (need to resume physiotherapy) showed limited prognostic value for functional recovery. High initial pain intensity is an important predictor for delayed functional recovery for patients with whiplash injury. Often mentioned factors like age, gender and compensation do not seem to be of prognostic value. Scientific information about prognostic factors can guide physicians or other care providers to direct treatment and to probably prevent chronicity. (C) 2003 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:303 / 322
页数:20
相关论文
共 77 条
  • [1] Systematic reviews in health care - Systematic reviews of evaluations of prognostic variables
    Altman, DG
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 323 (7306): : 224 - 228
  • [2] Physical risk factors for neck pain
    Ariëns, GA
    van Mechelen, W
    Bongers, PM
    Bouter, LM
    van der Wal, G
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 2000, 26 (01) : 7 - 19
  • [3] WHIPLASH INJURY
    BARNSLEY, L
    LORD, S
    BOGDUK, N
    [J]. PAIN, 1994, 58 (03) : 283 - 307
  • [4] The association between exposure to a rear-end collision and future neck or shoulder pain:: A cohort study
    Berglund, A
    Alfredsson, L
    Cassidy, JD
    Jensen, I
    Nygren, Å
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2000, 53 (11) : 1089 - 1094
  • [5] The association between exposure to a rear-end collision and future health complaints
    Berglund, A
    Alfredsson, L
    Jensen, I
    Cassidy, JD
    Nygren, Å
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 54 (08) : 851 - 856
  • [6] BOGDUK N, 2001, INT C WHIPL ASS DIS
  • [7] MRI of cerebrum and cervical columna within two days after whiplash neck sprain injury
    Borchgrevink, G
    Smevik, O
    Haave, I
    Haraldseth, O
    Nordby, A
    Lereim, I
    [J]. INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 1997, 28 (5-6): : 331 - 335
  • [8] BORCHGREVINK GE, 1995, ACTA RADIOL, V36, P425
  • [9] Personality profile among symptomatic and recovered patients with neck sprain injury, measured by MCMI-1 acutely and 6 months after car accidents
    Borchgrevink, GE
    Stiles, TC
    Borchgrevink, PC
    Lereim, I
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 1997, 42 (04) : 357 - 367
  • [10] The clinical course and prognostic factors of non-specific neck pain: a systematic review
    Borghouts, JAJ
    Koes, BW
    Bouter, LM
    [J]. PAIN, 1998, 77 (01) : 1 - 13