Endoscopic vacuum assisted wound closure (EVAC) device to treat esophageal and gastric leaks: assessing time to proficiency and cost

被引:21
作者
Ward, Marc A. [1 ,2 ]
Hassan, Tareq [1 ]
Burdick, James S. [3 ]
Leeds, Steven G. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Baylor Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Minimally Invas Surg, Dallas, TX 75246 USA
[2] Baylor Scott & White Hlth, Ctr Adv Surg, Dallas, TX 75246 USA
[3] Baylor Univ, Med Ctr, Adv Endoscop Consultants, Dallas, TX USA
[4] Baylor Univ, Med Ctr, Div Minimally Invas Surg, 3500 Gaston Ave,1st Floor Roberts Bldg, Dallas, TX 75246 USA
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2019年 / 33卷 / 12期
关键词
Endoscopic vacuum assisted closure; Proficiency; Cost utilization; Anastomotic leak; Intra-abdominal perforation; ANASTOMOTIC LEAKAGE; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-019-06685-2
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Endoluminal vacuum therapy (EVAC) is an emerging procedure used to treat anastomotic leaks and/or perforations that would otherwise require surgery. The aim of this study was to determine time to proficiency in EVAC and the cost effectiveness of the procedure. Methods We retrospectively reviewed a prospectively maintained IRB approved database for all patients undergoing EVAC after esophageal and gastric complications between October 2013 and December 2017. Proficiency was determined by obtaining predicted estimates and analyzing the point at which average procedure time plateaued based on case volume. Total cost was calculated based on supplies and location where the procedure was performed. Results There were 50 patients (17 males, 33 female), with a mean age of 52.1 years. EVAC was placed in 23 (46%) patients with esophageal injuries and 28 (56%) with gastric injuries. Two advanced endoscopists performed all EVAC procedures in this study (1 surgeon, 1 gastroenterologist). The average procedure time for all patients was 43.5 min and the average wheel in/wheel out time for all patients was 75.6 min. Analysis of the trend based on average procedure times for EVAC revealed that proficiency was obtained after 10 cases. Total cost of the procedure is significantly lower in the GI lab compared to the operating room ($4528 vs. $11889). The majority of EVAC were performed in the GI lab (62%) compared to the operating room (38%). Conclusion Successful outcomes in managing anastomotic leaks or intestinal perforations non-operatively has led to an increased interest in EVAC. For advanced endoscopists, time to proficiency is approximately 10 cases. Performing the procedure in the GI lab has a 2.5 reduction in total cost compared to the operating room.
引用
收藏
页码:3970 / 3975
页数:6
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Results of endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure device for treatment of upper GI leaks
    Bludau, Marc
    Fuchs, Hans F.
    Herbold, Till
    Maus, Martin K. H.
    Alakus, Hakan
    Popp, Felix
    Leers, Jessica M.
    Bruns, Christiane J.
    Hoelscher, Arnulf H.
    Schroeder, Wolfgang
    Chon, Seung-Hun
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 32 (04): : 1906 - 1914
  • [2] Endoscopic closure of esophageal intrathoracic leaks: stent versus endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure, a retrospective analysis
    Brangewitz, M.
    Voigtlaender, T.
    Helfritz, F. A.
    Lankisch, T. O.
    Winkler, M.
    Klempnauer, J.
    Manns, M. P.
    Schneider, A. S.
    Wedemeyer, J.
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2013, 45 (06) : 433 - 438
  • [3] Endotherapy of leaks and fistula
    Goenka, Mahesh Kumar
    Goenka, Usha
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 7 (07): : 702 - 713
  • [4] Management of gastric leaks after sleeve gastrectomy with endoluminal vacuum (E-Vac) therapy
    Leeds, Steven G.
    Burdick, James S.
    [J]. SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2016, 12 (07) : 1278 - 1285
  • [5] Endoluminal Vacuum Therapy for Esophageal and Upper Intestinal Anastomotic Leaks
    Leeds, Steven G.
    Burdick, James S.
    Fleshman, James W.
    [J]. JAMA SURGERY, 2016, 151 (06) : 573 - 574
  • [6] Use of a novel technique to manage gastrointestinal leaks with endoluminal negative pressure: a single institution experience
    Mencio, Marissa A.
    Ontiveros, Estrellita
    Burdick, James S.
    Leeds, Steven G.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 32 (07): : 3349 - 3356
  • [7] Modified Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy for Nonhealing Esophageal Anastomotic Leak: Technique Description and Review of Literature
    Pines, Guy
    Bar, Ilan
    Elami, Amir
    Sapojnikov, Shimon
    Hikri, Ofir
    Ton, Dennis
    Mosenkis, Bruce
    Melzer, Ehud
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 28 (01): : 33 - 40
  • [8] Endoscopic endoluminal vacuum therapy is superior to other regimens in managing anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy: a comparative retrospective study
    Schniewind, Bodo
    Schafmayer, Clemens
    Voehrs, Gesa
    Egberts, Jan
    von Schoenfels, Witigo
    Rose, Tobias
    Kurdow, Roland
    Arlt, Alexander
    Ellrichmann, Mark
    Juergensen, Christian
    Schreiber, Stefan
    Becker, Thomas
    Hampe, Jochen
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 27 (10): : 3883 - 3890
  • [9] Endolumenal Vacuum Therapy and Fistulojejunostomy in the Management of Sleeve Gastrectomy Staple Line Leaks
    Szymanski, Kyle
    Ontiveros, Estrellita
    Burdick, James S.
    Davis, Daniel
    Leeds, Steven G.
    [J]. CASE REPORTS IN SURGERY, 2018, 2018
  • [10] Endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure of upper intestinal anastomotic leaks
    Wedemeyer, Jochen
    Schneider, Andrea
    Manns, Michael P.
    Jackobs, Steffan
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2008, 67 (04) : 708 - 711