Audiometry-Based Screening Procedure for Cochlear Implant Candidacy

被引:59
作者
Hoppe, Ulrich [1 ]
Hast, Anne [1 ]
Hocke, Thomas [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Dept Audiol, ENT Clin, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
[2] Cochlear Deutschland GmbH & Co KG, Hannover, Germany
关键词
Candidacy; Cochlear implants; Hearing aids; Indications; Screening; Speech audiometry; UNILATERAL DEAFNESS; HEARING; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1097/MAO.0000000000000730
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective This study defines a screening procedure for cochlear implant (CI) candidacy in hearing aid users by using simple audiometric measures. Methods Within this retrospective study, hearing aid performance and audiometric measures in 185 subjects (318 ears) were analyzed. By means of a linear Naive Bayes classifier, the pure-tone average and the maximum monosyllabic score (PBmax) were used to predict the aided monosyllabic word score and CI candidacy. Results The two parameters PBmax and four-frequency hearing threshold average can be used to predict speech perception with hearing aids with reasonable accuracy for screening purposes. The classification has a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 91%. The classification can be represented by a simple linear formula. Conclusion CI candidacy can be predicted based on commonly used audiometric measures. Cochlear implant candidacy may be considered if the difference between the average pure-tone threshold (in decibels) and PBmax (in percent) exceeds 8.
引用
收藏
页码:1001 / 1005
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] How Does Deep Neural Network-Based Noise Reduction in Hearing Aids Impact Cochlear Implant Candidacy?
    Saoji, Aniket A.
    Sheikh, Bilal A.
    Bertsch, Natasha J.
    Goulson, Kayla R.
    Graham, Madison K.
    Mcdonald, Elizabeth A.
    Bross, Abigail E.
    Vaisberg, Jonathan M.
    Kuhnel, Volker
    Voss, Solveig C.
    Qian, Jinyu
    Hogan, Cynthia H.
    Dejong, Melissa D.
    AUDIOLOGY RESEARCH, 2024, 14 (06) : 1114 - 1125
  • [22] Further Evidence for Individual Ear Consideration in Cochlear Implant Candidacy Evaluation
    Patro, Ankita
    Lindquist, Nathan R.
    Holder, Jourdan T.
    Tawfik, Kareem O.
    O'Malley, Matthew R.
    Bennett, Marc L.
    Haynes, David S.
    Gifford, Rene
    Perkins, Elizabeth L.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2022, 43 (09) : 1033 - +
  • [23] Impact of unilateral vs. bilateral evaluation on cochlear implant candidacy
    Hoppe, Ulrich
    Hocke, Thomas
    Hast, Anne
    ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2024, 144 (03) : 207 - 218
  • [24] fMRI evaluation of cochlear implant candidacy in diffuse cortical cytomegalovirus disease
    Weiss, Joshua P.
    Bernal, Byron
    Balkany, Thomas J.
    Altman, Nolan
    Jethanamest, Dan
    Andersson, Erin
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2012, 122 (09) : 2064 - 2066
  • [25] Speech coding strategies and revised cochlear implant candidacy: An analysis of post-implant performance
    David, EE
    Ostroff, JM
    Shipp, D
    Nedzelski, JM
    Chen, JM
    Parnes, LS
    Zimmerman, K
    Schramm, D
    Seguin, C
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2003, 24 (02) : 228 - 233
  • [26] Evaluative audiometry after cochlear implant provision. German Version
    Dziemba, Oliver C.
    Merz, Stephan
    Hocke, Thomas
    HNO, 2023, 71 (10) : 669 - 677
  • [27] Enlarged Vestibular Aqueduct: Hearing Progression and Cochlear Implant Candidacy in Pediatric Patients
    Hodge, Sarah E.
    Thompson, Nicholas J.
    Park, Lisa R.
    Brown, Kevin D.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2021, 42 (01) : 203 - 206
  • [28] Beyond Sentence Recognition in Quiet for Older Adults: Implications for Cochlear Implant Candidacy
    Zhang, Emily
    Coelho, Daniel H.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2018, 39 (08) : 979 - 986
  • [29] Use of a Graded Profile Analysis to assess cochlear implant candidacy: recent findings
    MacDonald, L
    Sohn, G
    Papsin, BC
    Gordon, KA
    COCHLEAR IMPLANTS, 2004, 1273 : 215 - 218
  • [30] Development and Evaluation of a Language-Independent Test of Auditory Discrimination for Referrals for Cochlear Implant Candidacy Assessment
    Ching, Teresa Y. C.
    Dillon, Harvey
    Hou, Sanna
    Seeto, Mark
    Sodan, Ana
    Chong-White, Nicky
    EAR AND HEARING, 2022, 43 (04) : 1151 - 1163