Computer-Assisted Planning, Simulation, and Navigation System for Periacetabular Osteotomy

被引:9
作者
Liu, Li [1 ,2 ]
Siebenrock, Klaus [3 ]
Nolte, Lutz-P [2 ]
Zheng, Guoyan [2 ]
机构
[1] Shenzhen Univ, Natl Reg Key Technol Engn Lab Med Ultrasound, Guangdong Key Lab Biomed Measurements & Ultrasoun, Sch Biomed Engn,Hlth Sci Ctr, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Bern, Inst Surg Technol & Biomech, Bern, Switzerland
[3] Univ Bern, Dept Orthoped Surg, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
来源
INTELLIGENT ORTHOPAEDICS: ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND SMART IMAGE-GUIDED TECHNOLOGY FOR ORTHOPAEDICS | 2018年 / 1093卷
关键词
Hip dysplasia; Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO); Planning; Simulation; Navigation; Image-guided surgery; Joint preservation surgery; FEMOROACETABULAR IMPINGEMENT; FEMORAL-HEAD; DYSPLASIA; HIP;
D O I
10.1007/978-981-13-1396-7_12
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is an effective approach for surgical treatment of hip dysplasia in young adults. However, achieving an optimal acetabular reorientation during PAO is the most critical and challenging step. Routinely, the correct positioning of the acetabular fragment largely depends on the surgeon's experience and is done under fluoroscopy to provide the surgeon with continuous live x-ray guidance. Our developed system starts with a fully automatic detection of the acetabular rim, which allows for quantifying the acetabular 3D morphology with parameters such as acetabular orientation, femoral head extrusion index (EI), lateral center-edge (LCE) angle, and total and regional femoral head coverage (FHC) ratio for computer-assisted diagnosis, planning, and simulation of PAO. Intraoperative navigation is conducted to implement the preoperative plan. Two validation studies were conducted on four sawbone models to evaluate the efficacy of the system intraoperatively and postoperatively. By comparing the preoperatively planned situation with the intraoperatively achieved situation, average errors of 0.6 degrees +/- 0.3 degrees, 0.3 degrees +/- 0.2 degrees, and 1.1 degrees +/- 1.1 degrees were found, respectively, along three motion directions (flexion/extension, abduction/adduction, and external rotation/internal rotation). In addition, by comparing the preoperatively planned situation with the postoperative results, average errors of 0.9 degrees +/- 0.3 degrees and 0.9 degrees +/- 0.7 degrees were found for inclination and anteversion, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 155
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Reliability of computer-assisted surgery as an intraoperative ruler in navigated high tibial osteotomy
    Gebhard, Florian
    Krettek, Christian
    Huefner, Tobias
    Gruetzner, Paul A.
    Stoeckle, Ulrich
    Imhoff, Andreas B.
    Lorenz, Stephan
    Ljungqvist, Jan
    Keppler, Peter
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2011, 131 (03) : 297 - 302
  • [32] Computer-assisted surgery prevents complications during peri-acetabular osteotomy
    Hayashi, Shinya
    Hashimoto, Shingo
    Matsumoto, Tomoyuki
    Takayama, Koji
    Shibanuma, Nao
    Ishida, Kazunari
    Nishida, Kotaro
    Kuroda, Ryosuke
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2018, 42 (11) : 2555 - 2561
  • [33] Computer-Assisted Navigation of Volar Percutaneous Scaphoid Placement
    Walsh, Eric
    Crisco, Joseph J.
    Wolfe, Scott W.
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2009, 34A (09): : 1722 - 1728
  • [34] Computer-assisted stereotactic neurosurgery with framework neurosurgery navigation
    Liu Fengqiang
    Qian Jiadong
    Lu Yi
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2008, 110 (07) : 696 - 700
  • [35] Review: Current concepts in computer-assisted hip arthroscopy
    Nakano, Naoki
    Audenaert, Emmanuel
    Ranawat, Anil
    Khanduja, Vikas
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2018, 14 (06)
  • [36] Computer-assisted navigation applied to fetal cardiac intervention
    Emery, Stephen P.
    Kreutzer, Jacqueline
    Sherman, Frederick R.
    Fujimoto, Kazuro L.
    Jaramaz, Branislav
    Nikou, Constantinos
    Tobita, Kimimasa
    Keller, Bradley B.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2007, 3 (03) : 187 - 198
  • [37] Computer-Assisted Navigation in Knee Arthroplasty: A Critical Appraisal
    Venkatesan, Muralidharan
    Mahadevan, Devendra
    Ashford, Robert U.
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2013, 26 (05) : 357 - 361
  • [38] Computer-assisted double level osteotomy for severe genu varum
    Saragaglia, Dominique
    Nemer, Charbel
    Colle, Pierre-Emmanuel
    SPORTS MEDICINE AND ARTHROSCOPY REVIEW, 2008, 16 (02) : 91 - 96
  • [39] Computer-Assisted Techniques in Corrective Distal Radius Osteotomy Procedures
    Caiti, Giuliana
    Dobbe, Johannes G. G.
    Strackee, Simon D.
    Strijkers, Gustav J.
    Streekstra, Geert J.
    IEEE REVIEWS IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 13 : 233 - 247
  • [40] Computer-Assisted Rotational Acetabular Osteotomy for Patients with Acetabular Dysplasia
    Inaba, Yutaka
    Kobayashi, Naomi
    Ike, Hiroyuki
    Kubota, So
    Saito, Tomoyuki
    CLINICS IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY, 2016, 8 (01) : 99 - 105