Comparison of Object Detection and Patch-Based Classification Deep Learning Models on Mid- to Late-Season Weed Detection in UAV Imagery

被引:137
作者
Veeranampalayam Sivakumar, Arun Narenthiran [1 ]
Li, Jiating [1 ]
Scott, Stephen [2 ]
Psota, Eric [3 ]
J. Jhala, Amit [4 ]
Luck, Joe D. [1 ]
Shi, Yeyin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska, Dept Biol Syst Engn, Lincoln, NE 68583 USA
[2] Univ Nebraska, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Lincoln, NE 68588 USA
[3] Univ Nebraska, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Lincoln, NE 68588 USA
[4] Univ Nebraska, Dept Agron & Hort, Lincoln, NE 68583 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
CNN; Faster RCNN; SSD; Inception v2; patch-based CNN; MobileNet v2; detection performance; inference time; CONVOLUTIONAL NETWORKS; MULTISPECTRAL IMAGERY; MANAGEMENT; SUNFLOWER; WHEAT; CROP; DISCRIMINATION; AGRICULTURE; BARLEY; CEREAL;
D O I
10.3390/rs12132136
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Mid- to late-season weeds that escape from the routine early-season weed management threaten agricultural production by creating a large number of seeds for several future growing seasons. Rapid and accurate detection of weed patches in field is the first step of site-specific weed management. In this study, object detection-based convolutional neural network models were trained and evaluated over low-altitude unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imagery for mid- to late-season weed detection in soybean fields. The performance of two object detection models, Faster RCNN and the Single Shot Detector (SSD), were evaluated and compared in terms of weed detection performance using mean Intersection over Union (IoU) and inference speed. It was found that the Faster RCNN model with 200 box proposals had similar good weed detection performance to the SSD model in terms of precision, recall, f1 score, and IoU, as well as a similar inference time. The precision, recall, f1 score and IoU were 0.65, 0.68, 0.66 and 0.85 for Faster RCNN with 200 proposals, and 0.66, 0.68, 0.67 and 0.84 for SSD, respectively. However, the optimal confidence threshold of the SSD model was found to be much lower than that of the Faster RCNN model, which indicated that SSD might have lower generalization performance than Faster RCNN for mid- to late-season weed detection in soybean fields using UAV imagery. The performance of the object detection model was also compared with patch-based CNN model. The Faster RCNN model yielded a better weed detection performance than the patch-based CNN with and without overlap. The inference time of Faster RCNN was similar to patch-based CNN without overlap, but significantly less than patch-based CNN with overlap. Hence, Faster RCNN was found to be the best model in terms of weed detection performance and inference time among the different models compared in this study. This work is important in understanding the potential and identifying the algorithms for an on-farm, near real-time weed detection and management.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]  
Andrea CC, 2017, 2017 IEEE SECOND ECUADOR TECHNICAL CHAPTERS MEETING (ETCM)
[2]   Deep Learning Based Classification System for Identifying Weeds Using High-Resolution UAV Imagery [J].
Bah, M. Dian ;
Dericquebourg, Eric ;
Hafiane, Adel ;
Canals, Raphael .
INTELLIGENT COMPUTING, VOL 2, 2019, 857 :176-187
[3]   Spatial stability of Avena sterilis ssp ludoviciana populations under annual applications of low rates of imazamethabenz [J].
Barroso, J ;
Fernàndez-Quintanilla, C ;
Ruiz, D ;
Hernaiz, P ;
Rew, LJ .
WEED RESEARCH, 2004, 44 (03) :178-186
[4]   Active Learning for Deep Object Detection [J].
Brust, Clemens-Alexander ;
Kaeding, Christoph ;
Denzler, Joachim .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 14TH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION, IMAGING AND COMPUTER GRAPHICS THEORY AND APPLICATIONS (VISAPP), VOL 5, 2019, :181-190
[5]  
Burks TF, 2000, T ASAE, V43, P441, DOI 10.13031/2013.2723
[6]  
Casa R., 2019, Precision Agriculture 2019, P365, DOI [10.3920/978-90, DOI 10.3920/978-90, 10.3920/978-90-8686-888-9_45., DOI 10.3920/978-90-8686-888-9_45]
[7]   Assessing the potential of images from unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) to support herbicide patch spraying in maize [J].
Castaldi, F. ;
Pelosi, F. ;
Pascucci, S. ;
Casa, R. .
PRECISION AGRICULTURE, 2017, 18 (01) :76-94
[8]   Ecology and management of weeds under conservation agriculture: A review [J].
Chauhan, Bhagirath Singh ;
Singh, Ravi Gopal ;
Mahajan, Gulshan .
CROP PROTECTION, 2012, 38 :57-65
[9]  
Chollet F., TRANSFER LEARNING US
[10]   Site-specific weed control technologies [J].
Christensen, S. ;
Sogaard, H. T. ;
Kudsk, P. ;
Norremark, M. ;
Lund, I. ;
Nadimi, E. S. ;
Jorgensen, R. .
WEED RESEARCH, 2009, 49 (03) :233-241