A novel low-cost approach for navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation

被引:15
作者
Rodseth, Jakob [1 ]
Washabaugh, Edward P. [1 ,3 ]
Krishnan, Chandramouli [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Med Sch, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Kinesiol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Biomed Engn, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Frameless stereotaxic system; brain stimulation; neuronavigation; coil tracking; motor mapping; co-registration; MOTOR-EVOKED-POTENTIALS; VOLUNTARY ACTIVATION; ISCHEMIC-STROKE; COIL PLACEMENT; TMS; EXCITABILITY; RECONSTRUCTION; INHIBITION; RECOVERY; FMRI;
D O I
10.3233/RNN-170751
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Background: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is commonly used for assessing or modulating brain excitability. However, the credibility of TMS outcomes depends on accurate and reliable coil placement during stimulation. Navigated TMS systems can address this issue, but these systems are expensive for routine use in clinical and research environments. Objective: The purpose of this study was to provide a high-quality open source framework for navigated TMS and test its reliability and accuracy using standard TMS procedures. Methods: A navigated TMS system was created using a low-cost 3D camera system (OptiTrack Trio), which communicates with our free and open source software environment programmed using the Unity 3D gaming engine. The environment is user friendly and has functions to allow for a variety of stimulation procedures (e.g., head and coil co-registration, multiple hotspot/grid tracking, intuitive matching, and data logging). The system was then validated using a static mockup of a TMS session. The clinical utility was also evaluated by assessing the repeatability and operator accuracy when collecting motor evoked potential (MEP) data from human subjects. Results: The system was highly reliable and improved coil placement accuracy (position error = 1.2 mm and orientation error = 0.3.) as well as the quality and consistency (ICC > 0.95) of MEPs recorded during TMS. Conclusion: These results indicate that the proposed system is a viable tool for reliable coil placement during TMS procedures, and can improve accuracy in locating the coil over a desired hotspot both within and between sessions.
引用
收藏
页码:601 / 609
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Non-invasive mapping of calculation function by repetitive navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation
    Maurer, Stefanie
    Tanigawa, Noriko
    Sollmann, Nico
    Hauck, Theresa
    Ille, Sebastian
    Boeckh-Behrens, Tobias
    Meyer, Bernhard
    Krieg, Sandro M.
    BRAIN STRUCTURE & FUNCTION, 2016, 221 (08) : 3927 - 3947
  • [32] Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (nTMS) based Preoperative Planning for Brain Tumor Treatment
    Riaz, Hammad
    Uzair, Mohammad
    Arshad, Muhammad
    Hamza, Ali
    Bukhari, Nedal
    Azam, Faisal
    Bashir, Shahid
    CNS & NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS-DRUG TARGETS, 2024, 23 (07) : 883 - 893
  • [33] Application of Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Map the Supplementary Motor Area in Healthy Subjects
    Schramm, Severin
    Sollmann, Nico
    Ille, Sebastian
    Meyer, Bernhard
    Krieg, Sandro M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 37 (02) : 140 - 149
  • [34] Spatial extent of cortical motor hotspot in navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation
    Reijonen, Jusa
    Pitkanen, Minna
    Kallioniemi, Elisa
    Mohammadi, Ali
    Ilmoniemi, Risto J.
    Julkunen, Petro
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2020, 346
  • [35] Localization of Sensorimotor Cortex Using Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Magnetoencephalography
    Pitkanen, Minna
    Yazawa, Shogo
    Airaksinen, Katja
    Lioumis, Pantelis
    Nurminen, Jussi
    Pekkonen, Eero
    Makela, Jyrki P.
    BRAIN TOPOGRAPHY, 2019, 32 (05) : 873 - 881
  • [36] Introducing navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation as a refined brain mapping methodology
    Krings, T
    Chiappa, KH
    Foltys, H
    Reinges, MHT
    Cosgrove, GR
    Thron, A
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2001, 24 (04) : 171 - 179
  • [37] Comparison of navigated and non-navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation for motor cortex mapping, motor threshold and motor evoked potentials
    Julkunen, Petro
    Saisanen, Laura
    Danner, Nils
    Niskanen, Eini
    Hukkanen, Taina
    Mervaala, Esa
    Kononen, Mervi
    NEUROIMAGE, 2009, 44 (03) : 790 - 795
  • [38] TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION OF THE CEREBELLUM
    Minks, Eduard
    Kopickova, Marie
    Marecek, Radek
    Streitova, Hana
    Bares, Martin
    BIOMEDICAL PAPERS-OLOMOUC, 2010, 154 (02): : 133 - 139
  • [39] Evaluation of Changes in Preoperative Cortical Excitability by Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Patients With Brain Tumor
    Neville, Iuri Santana
    dos Santos, Alexandra Gomes
    Almeida, Cesar Cimonari
    Hayashi, Cintya Yukie
    Fontoura Solla, Davi Jorge
    Galhardoni, Ricardo
    de Andrade, Daniel Ciampi
    Brunoni, Andre Russowsky
    Teixeira, Manoel Jacobsen
    Paiva, Wellingson Silva
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [40] Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation for preoperative cortical mapping of expressive language in children: Development of a method
    Selassie, Gunilla Rejno-Habte
    Pegenius, Goran
    Viggedal, Gerd
    Hallbook, Tove
    Thordstein, Magnus
    EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2018, 87 : 180 - 187