Carotid artery stenting with distal protection using the carotid wallstent and FilterWire neuroprotection: Single-center experience of 380 cases with midterm outcomes

被引:14
|
作者
Lin, Peter H. [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Wei [2 ]
Guerrero, Marlon A. [2 ]
McCoy, Sally A. [2 ]
Felkaz, Deborah [2 ]
Kougias, Panos [2 ]
El Sayed, Hosam F. [2 ]
机构
[1] Baylor Coll Med, Michael E DeBakey Dep Surg, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Baylor Coll Med, Methodist Hosp, Div Vasc Surg & Endovasc Therapy, Michael E DeBakey Dept Surg, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
carotid artery stenting; distal protection device; high-risk patients; restenosis;
D O I
10.2310/6670.2006.00054
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Emerging data have supported the clinical efficacy of carotid artery stenting (CAS) in stroke prevention in high-risk surgical patients. This study was performed to evaluate the midterm clinical outcome of CAS using the Carotid Wallstent and FilterWire distal protection (both Boston Scientific, Natick, MA) at an academic institution. Risk factors for in-stent restenosis (ISR) were also analyzed. Clinical variables and treatment outcome of high-risk patients who underwent Carotid Wallstent placement with FilterWire EX/EZ neuroprotection were analyzed during a recent 54-month period. Three hundred eighty CAS procedures were performed in 354 patients. Technical success was achieved in 372 cases (98%), and symptomatic lesions existed in 85 (24%) patients. No patient experienced periprocedural mortality or neuroprotective device-related complication. The 30-day stroke and death rate was 2.7%, and the overall complication rate was 6.9%. The overall major or fatal stroke rates in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients were 4.6% and 1.3%, respectively (not significant). The overall stroke and death rates between the symptomatic and asymptomatic groups were 5.8% and 2.4%, respectively (not significant). The median follow-up period was 29 months (range 1-53 months). With Kaplan-Meier analysis, the rates of freedom from 60% or greater ISR after CAS procedures at 12, 24, 36, and 48 months were 97%,94%,92%, and 90%, respectively. The rates of freedom from all fatal and nonfatal strokes at 12, 24, 36, and 48 months were 97%,91%, 89%, and 85%, respectively. Multivariable analysis of significant univariate predictors identified that postendarterectomy stenosis (odds ratio [OR] 3.98, p = .02) and multiple stent placement (OR 3.68, p =.03) were independent predictors of ISR. Our study yielded favorable short-term and midterm clinical results using Carotid Wallstent with FilterWire neuroprotection. Late follow-up results showed low rates of fatal and nonfatal stroke and favorable ISR rates compared with other carotid stent trials. Postendarterectomy and multiple stent placement were associated with subsequent ISR.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 244
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The safety and efficacy of the Mo.Ma system device for carotid artery stenting: A single-center experience from Taiwan
    Cheng, Cheng-Chung
    Lin, Chin-Sheng
    Yin, Wei-Hsian
    Lin, Chin
    Liu, I-Fan
    Lee, Yu-Feng
    Liu, Wei-Ting
    Fu, Hao-Neng
    Huang, Chien-Lung
    Tsao, Tien-Ping
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [32] Outcomes of Symptomatic Extracranial Carotid Artery Stenting in Octogenarians: A Single-Center Retrospective Study on Restenosis, Risk Factors, and Complications
    Ertugrul, Ozgur Zulfukar
    Karaaslan, Firat
    Yilmaz, Resit
    Tuncer, Mehmet Cudi
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2025, 61 (03):
  • [33] Simultaneous Carotid Artery Stenting and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Urgent Patients: A Single Center Experience
    Fiorentino, Mariafrancesca
    Mikus, Elisa
    Nerla, Roberto
    Sangiorgi, Diego
    Ruggiero, Andrea
    Tripodi, Alberto
    Castriota, Fausto
    Savini, Carlo
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (23)
  • [34] Simultaneous Bilateral Carotid Stenting in a Series of 9 Patients: A Single-Center Experience with Review of Literature
    Alurkar, Anand
    Karanam, Lakshmi Sudha Prasanna
    Nayak, Suresh
    Oak, Sagar
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL IMAGING SCIENCE, 2012, 2
  • [35] Six-year outcomes of carotid artery stenting performed with multidisciplinary management in a single center
    Koklu, Erkan
    Arslan, Sakir
    Gencer, Elif Sarionder
    Bayer, Nermin
    Avci, Rauf
    Ozgunoglu, Edip Can
    ANATOLIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 25 (06) : 385 - 394
  • [36] Carotid artery stenting with Roadsaver stent. Early and four-year results from a single-center registry
    Machnik, Roman A.
    Pieniazek, Piotr
    Misztal, Marcin
    Plens, Krzysztof
    Kazibudzki, Marek
    Tomaszewski, Tomasz
    Brzychczy, Andrzej
    Musial, Robert
    Trystula, Mariusz
    Tekieli, Lukasz M.
    POSTEPY W KARDIOLOGII INTERWENCYJNEJ, 2020, 16 (04): : 444 - 451
  • [37] Treatment Results of Carotid Artery Stenting with an Open-Cell Stent: Analysis of 734 Consecutive Cases at a Single Center
    Omura, Yoshihiro
    Imamura, Hirotoshi
    Tani, Shoichi
    Adachi, Hidemitsu
    Sakaguchi, Manabu
    Todo, Kenichi
    Yamagami, Hiroshi
    Goto, Masanori
    Ohara, Nobuyuki
    Fukumitsu, Ryu
    Sunohara, Tadashi
    Matsumoto, Shirabe
    Fukui, Nobuyuki
    Fukuda, Tatsumaru
    Akiyama, Tomoaki
    Ohta, Tsuyoshi
    Sakai, Chiaki
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 187 : E453 - E459
  • [38] Restenosis Predictors after Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting and Its Influence on Procedure Durability, Single-Center Experience
    Mansour, Ossama Y.
    Ibrahim, Abdelrahman
    Talaat, Mostafa
    JOURNAL OF STROKE & CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2017, 26 (10) : 2215 - 2222
  • [39] Carotid Revascularization with and without the Use of an Embolic Protection Device: A Single-Center Experience from Pakistan
    Bashir, Qasim
    Baig, Ammad Anwar
    INTERVENTIONAL NEUROLOGY, 2018, 7 (06) : 378 - 388
  • [40] Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stenting in High-Risk Patients With Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Single Neurovascular Center Retrospective Review of 101 Consecutive Patients
    Meyer, Scott A.
    Gandhi, Chirag D.
    Johnson, David M.
    Winn, H. Richard
    Patel, Aman B.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2010, 66 (03) : 448 - 453