INCREASED CROSS-EDUCATION OF MUSCLE STRENGTH AND REDUCED CORTICOSPINAL INHIBITION FOLLOWING ECCENTRIC STRENGTH TRAINING

被引:106
作者
Kidgell, D. J. [1 ]
Frazer, A. K. [2 ]
Rantalainen, T. [2 ]
Ruotsalainen, I. [3 ]
Ahtiainen, J. [3 ]
Avela, J. [3 ]
Howatson, G. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] La Trobe Univ, Sch Allied Hlth, Dept Rehabil Nutr & Sport, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Deakin Univ, Ctr Phys Act & Nutr Res, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Jyvaskyla, Dept Biol & Phys Act, Jyvaskyla, Finland
[4] Northumbria Univ, Dept Sport Exercise & Rehabil, Fac Hlth & Life Sci, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[5] Northwest Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Dev, Water Res Grp, Potchefstroom, South Africa
关键词
corticospinal inhibition; cross-activation; cross-transfer; ipsilateral motor cortex; strength; recovery; MOTOR CORTEX; CONTRACTIONS; ACTIVATION; EXCITABILITY; ADAPTATIONS; LIMB; RESPONSES; GREATER; OUTPUT;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.05.057
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Aim: Strength training of one limb results in a substantial increase in the strength of the untrained limb, however, it remains unknown what the corticospinal responses are following either eccentric or concentric strength training and how this relates to the cross-education of strength. The aim of this study was to determine if eccentric or concentric unilateral strength training differentially modulates corticospinal excitability, inhibition and the cross-transfer of strength. Methods: Changes in contralateral (left limb) concentric strength, eccentric strength, motor-evoked potentials, short-interval intracortical inhibition and silent period durations were analyzed in groups of young adults who exercised the right wrist flexors with either eccentric (N = 9) or concentric (N = 9) contractions for 12 sessions over 4 weeks. Control subjects (N = 9) did not train. Results: Following training, both groups exhibited a significant strength gain in the trained limb (concentric group increased concentric strength by 64% and eccentric group increased eccentric strength by 62%) and the extent of the cross-transfer of strength was 28% and 47% for the concentric and eccentric group, respectively, which was different between groups (P = 0.031). Transcranial magnetic stimulation revealed that eccentric training reduced intracortical inhibition (37%), silent period duration (15-27%) and increased corticospinal excitability (51%) compared to concentric training for the untrained limb (P = 0.033). There was no change in the control group. Conclusion: The results show that eccentric training uniquely modulates corticospinal excitability and inhibition of the untrained limb to a greater extent than concentric training. These findings suggest that unilateral eccentric contractions provide a greater stimulus in cross-education paradigms and should be an integral part of the rehabilitative process following unilateral injury to maximize the response. (C) 2015 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:566 / 575
页数:10
相关论文
共 45 条
[41]   Age-related differences in corticospinal control during functional isometric contractions in left and right hands [J].
Sale, MV ;
Semmler, JG .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 99 (04) :1483-1493
[42]  
Scripture E.W., 1894, ON ED MUSCULAR CONTR, V2, P114
[43]   Differences in recruitment properties of the corticospinal pathway between lengthening and shortening contractions in human soleus muscle [J].
Sekiguchi, H ;
Nakazawa, K ;
Suzuki, S .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 2003, 977 (02) :169-179
[44]   Differential effects on motorcortical inhibition induced by blockade of GABA uptake in humans [J].
Werhahn, KJ ;
Kunesch, E ;
Noachtar, S ;
Benecke, R ;
Classen, J .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1999, 517 (02) :591-597
[45]   The origin of activity in the biceps brachii muscle during voluntary contractions of the contralateral elbow flexor muscles [J].
Zijdewind, Inge ;
Butler, Jane E. ;
Gandevia, Simon C. ;
Taylor, Janet L. .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2006, 175 (03) :526-535