Microchip injection and separation anomalies due to pressure effects

被引:120
作者
Crabtree, HJ
Cheong, ECS
Tilroe, DA
Backhouse, CJ
机构
[1] Micralyne Inc, Edmonton, AB T6N 1E6, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G7, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1021/ac010217r
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
While performing routine electroosmotically driven CE separations on microfluidic chips, we have observed peak shape, migration time, and baseline drift anomalies. Pressure-driven backflow (opposing electroosmotic flow (EOF)) has been observed and characterized, and meniscus surface tension (Laplace pressure) is cited as the likely cause. However, there are a number of interdependent factors that affect bulk flow in a microchip environment, including evaporation, buffer depletion due to hydrolysis, EOF pumping, siphoning, viscosity changes due to Joule heating, and Laplace pressure. Given the complexity of such a system, pressure effects were isolated from EOF, and to some extent, siphoning effects were isolated from suspected meniscus effects. Pressure flow observed in the absence of an applied field ranged from 0.4 to 0.8 mm/s, which was on the order of the EOF generated experimentally, 0.6 mm/s at a field of 150 V/cm., and was some 10-20 times larger than what would be predicted merely from a difference in liquid levels (siphoning). Furthermore, experiments were performed without an electric field and with the chip tilted so that meniscus flow ran "uphill" against a siphoning backflow and showed siphoning flow to have a negligible effect upon meniscus flow under the microchip conditions studied. These findings are relevant to the profusion of microfluidic and array-based technology that also use microliter liquid volumes in like-sized reservoirs with similar menisci.
引用
收藏
页码:4079 / 4086
页数:8
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
ADAMSON AW, 1997, PHYSICAL CHEM SURFAC
[2]  
Becker Holger, 1996, Science Progress, V79, P49
[3]   Influence of pH*-value of methanolic electrolytes on electroosmotic flow in hydrophilic coated capillaries [J].
Belder, D ;
Elke, K ;
Husmann, H .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2000, 868 (01) :63-71
[4]   Microstructure for efficient continuous flow mixing [J].
Bessoth, FG ;
deMello, AJ ;
Manz, A .
ANALYTICAL COMMUNICATIONS, 1999, 36 (06) :213-215
[5]  
BOER G, 1998, STUDIES HYDROSTATIC, P492
[6]   Shah convolution Fourier transform detection [J].
Crabtree, HJ ;
Kopp, MU ;
Manz, A .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1999, 71 (11) :2130-2138
[7]   Porous silicon as the carrier matrix in microstructured enzyme reactors yielding high enzyme activities [J].
Drott, J ;
Lindstrom, K ;
Rosengren, L ;
Laurell, T .
JOURNAL OF MICROMECHANICS AND MICROENGINEERING, 1997, 7 (01) :14-23
[8]   Microfabricated centrifugal microfluidic systems: Characterization and multiple enzymatic assays [J].
Duffy, DC ;
Gillis, HL ;
Lin, J ;
Sheppard, NF ;
Kellogg, GJ .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1999, 71 (20) :4669-4678
[9]  
EKSTRAND G, 2000, MICROFLUIDICS ROTATI, P623
[10]   Electroosmosis- and pressure-driven chromatography in chips using continuous beds [J].
Ericson, C ;
Holm, J ;
Ericson, T ;
Hjertén, S .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2000, 72 (01) :81-87