A review of instrumental variable estimators for Mendelian randomization

被引:998
|
作者
Burgess, Stephen [1 ]
Small, Dylan S. [2 ]
Thompson, Simon G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Cambridge, England
[2] Univ Penn, Wharton Sch, Dept Stat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
基金
英国惠康基金; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Instrumental variable; comparison of methods; causal inference; weak instruments; finite-sample bias; Mendelian randomization; MULTIPLE GENETIC-VARIANTS; WEAK INSTRUMENTS; CAUSAL INFERENCE; GENERALIZED-METHOD; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; SAMPLE PROPERTIES; CONFIDENCE SETS; CLINICAL-TRIALS; BIAS;
D O I
10.1177/0962280215597579
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Instrumental variable analysis is an approach for obtaining causal inferences on the effect of an exposure (risk factor) on an outcome from observational data. It has gained in popularity over the past decade with the use of genetic variants as instrumental variables, known as Mendelian randomization. An instrumental variable is associated with the exposure, but not associated with any confounder of the exposure-outcome association, nor is there any causal pathway from the instrumental variable to the outcome other than via the exposure. Under the assumption that a single instrumental variable or a set of instrumental variables for the exposure is available, the causal effect of the exposure on the outcome can be estimated. There are several methods available for instrumental variable estimation; we consider the ratio method, two-stage methods, likelihood-based methods, and semi-parametric methods. Techniques for obtaining statistical inferences and confidence intervals are presented. The statistical properties of estimates from these methods are compared, and practical advice is given about choosing a suitable analysis method. In particular, bias and coverage properties of estimators are considered, especially with weak instruments. Settings particularly relevant to Mendelian randomization are prioritized in the paper, notably the scenario of a continuous exposure and a continuous or binary outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:2333 / 2355
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Bias and mean squared error in Mendelian randomization with invalid instrumental variables
    Deng, Lu
    Fu, Sheng
    Yu, Kai
    GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2024, 48 (01) : 27 - 41
  • [32] Mendelian randomization for nephrologists
    Dobrijevic, Ellen
    van Zwieten, Anita
    Kiryluk, Krzysztof
    Grant, Andrew J.
    Wong, Germaine
    Teixeira-Pinto, Armando
    KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 104 (06) : 1113 - 1123
  • [33] Improving the robustness and efficiency of covariate-adjusted linear instrumental variable estimators
    Vansteelandt, Stijn
    Didelez, Vanessa
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF STATISTICS, 2018, 45 (04) : 941 - 961
  • [34] Inferring causality from observational studies: the role of instrumental variable analysis
    Fu, Rui
    Kim, S. Joseph
    KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 99 (06) : 1303 - 1308
  • [35] simmrd: An open-source tool to perform simulations in Mendelian randomization
    Lorincz-Comi, Noah
    Yang, Yihe
    Zhu, Xiaofeng
    GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2024, 48 (02) : 59 - 73
  • [36] Mendelian Randomization Analysis With Multiple Genetic Variants Using Summarized Data
    Burgess, Stephen
    Butterworth, Adam
    Thompson, Simon G.
    GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 37 (07) : 658 - 665
  • [37] A General Approach to Sensitivity Analysis for Mendelian Randomization
    Zhang, Weiming
    Ghosh, Debashis
    STATISTICS IN BIOSCIENCES, 2021, 13 (01) : 34 - 55
  • [38] Review of Mendelian Randomization Studies on Endometrial Cancer
    Guo, Jian-Zeng
    Wu, Qi-Jun
    Liu, Fang-Hua
    Gao, Chang
    Gong, Ting-Ting
    Li, Gang
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [39] Doubly robust nonparametric instrumental variable estimators for survival outcomes
    Lee, Youjin
    Kennedy, Edward H.
    Mitra, Nandita
    BIOSTATISTICS, 2023, 24 (02) : 518 - 537
  • [40] Reporting and guidelines for mendelian randomization analysis: A systematic review of oncological studies
    Lor, Gary C. Y.
    Risch, Harvey A.
    Fung, W. T.
    Yeung, S. L. Au
    Wong, Irene O. L.
    Zheng, Wei
    Pang, Herbert
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 62