A review of instrumental variable estimators for Mendelian randomization

被引:998
|
作者
Burgess, Stephen [1 ]
Small, Dylan S. [2 ]
Thompson, Simon G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Cambridge, England
[2] Univ Penn, Wharton Sch, Dept Stat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
基金
英国惠康基金; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Instrumental variable; comparison of methods; causal inference; weak instruments; finite-sample bias; Mendelian randomization; MULTIPLE GENETIC-VARIANTS; WEAK INSTRUMENTS; CAUSAL INFERENCE; GENERALIZED-METHOD; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; SAMPLE PROPERTIES; CONFIDENCE SETS; CLINICAL-TRIALS; BIAS;
D O I
10.1177/0962280215597579
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Instrumental variable analysis is an approach for obtaining causal inferences on the effect of an exposure (risk factor) on an outcome from observational data. It has gained in popularity over the past decade with the use of genetic variants as instrumental variables, known as Mendelian randomization. An instrumental variable is associated with the exposure, but not associated with any confounder of the exposure-outcome association, nor is there any causal pathway from the instrumental variable to the outcome other than via the exposure. Under the assumption that a single instrumental variable or a set of instrumental variables for the exposure is available, the causal effect of the exposure on the outcome can be estimated. There are several methods available for instrumental variable estimation; we consider the ratio method, two-stage methods, likelihood-based methods, and semi-parametric methods. Techniques for obtaining statistical inferences and confidence intervals are presented. The statistical properties of estimates from these methods are compared, and practical advice is given about choosing a suitable analysis method. In particular, bias and coverage properties of estimators are considered, especially with weak instruments. Settings particularly relevant to Mendelian randomization are prioritized in the paper, notably the scenario of a continuous exposure and a continuous or binary outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:2333 / 2355
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Mendelian randomization: causal inference leveraging genetic data
    Chen, Lane G.
    Tubbs, Justin D.
    Liu, Zipeng
    Thach, Thuan-Quoc
    Sham, Pak C.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 54 (08) : 1461 - 1474
  • [22] Mendelian Randomization Studies of Cancer Risk: a Literature Review
    Brandon L. Pierce
    Peter Kraft
    Chenan Zhang
    Current Epidemiology Reports, 2018, 5 : 184 - 196
  • [23] Mendelian Randomization Studies of Cancer Risk: a Literature Review
    Pierce, Brandon L.
    Kraft, Peter
    Zhang, Chenan
    CURRENT EPIDEMIOLOGY REPORTS, 2018, 5 (02) : 184 - 196
  • [24] Mendelian randomization with a binary exposure variable: interpretation and presentation of causal estimates
    Stephen Burgess
    Jeremy A. Labrecque
    European Journal of Epidemiology, 2018, 33 : 947 - 952
  • [25] A Review of Mendelian Randomization: Assumptions, Methods, and Application to Obesity-Related Diseases
    Lee, Seungjae
    Lee, Woojoo
    JOURNAL OF OBESITY & METABOLIC SYNDROME, 2025, 34 (01) : 14 - 26
  • [26] Lack of Identification in Semiparametric Instrumental Variable Models With Binary Outcomes
    Burgess, Stephen
    Granell, Raquel
    Palmer, Tom M.
    Sterne, Jonathan A. C.
    Didelez, Vanessa
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 180 (01) : 111 - 119
  • [27] Avoiding bias from weak instruments in Mendelian randomization studies
    Burgess, Stephen
    Thompson, Simon G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 40 (03) : 755 - 764
  • [28] Common Methods for Performing Mendelian Randomization
    Teumer, Alexander
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2018, 5
  • [29] Challenge in interpretation of Mendelian randomization studies using lactase persistence as instrumental variable
    Vissers, L. E. T.
    van der Schouw, Y. T.
    Sluijs, I.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2018, 72 (01) : 179 - 180
  • [30] Correcting the Standard Errors of 2-Stage Residual Inclusion Estimators for Mendelian Randomization Studies
    Palmer, Tom M.
    Holmes, Michael V.
    Keating, Brendan J.
    Sheehan, Nuala A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 186 (09) : 1104 - 1114